Does Postoperative Physical Therapy Impact Pain, Opioid Consumption, and Clinical Outcomes after Single-Level Lumbar Fusion?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005431
Jonathan Dalton, Robert J Oris, Michael A McCurdy, Teeto Ezeonu, Rajkishen Narayanan, Abbey Glover, Molly Milano, Alexander Dawes, Ian David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Barrett I Woods, John J Mangan, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler
{"title":"Does Postoperative Physical Therapy Impact Pain, Opioid Consumption, and Clinical Outcomes after Single-Level Lumbar Fusion?","authors":"Jonathan Dalton, Robert J Oris, Michael A McCurdy, Teeto Ezeonu, Rajkishen Narayanan, Abbey Glover, Molly Milano, Alexander Dawes, Ian David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Barrett I Woods, John J Mangan, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the impact of physical therapy (PT) on opioid consumption, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following single-level lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Physical therapy following lumbar fusion surgery is variably prescribed, with the goals of pain relief and return to activity. However, existing evidence on the efficacy of postoperative PT after spine surgery is heterogeneous and generally low-quality. Furthermore, the impact of PT on opioid use following lumbar fusion has been minimally studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients underwent single-level lumbar fusion surgery at a single tertiary academic institution. Insurance claims data was reviewed to determine which patients utilized outpatient PT in the 180 days postoperatively. Patient demographics, surgical variables, surgical outcomes, and PROMs were compared between patients with postoperative PT and those without. The state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) database was utilized to record prescription opioid use in the 1-year preoperative and 1-year postoperative periods. Multivariate regression analyses were created to examine the impact of PT on postoperative opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 patients were included; 187 patients received postoperative PT while 178 did not. There were no differences in demographics/surgical variables, surgical outcomes, or PROMs between groups. There was no difference in preoperative or postoperative opioid use, total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), or total opioid prescriptions between groups. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the use of PT was not a significant predictor of MME consumption at any time point after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PT does not appear to increase complications after single-level lumbar fusion, and thus is likely a safe consideration during recovery. However, it may not significantly improve outcomes or reduce opioid consumption when implemented routinely for all patients. Surgeons should consider individual patient risk factors when deciding on optimal postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective Cohort.

Objective: To determine the impact of physical therapy (PT) on opioid consumption, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following single-level lumbar fusion.

Summary of background data: Physical therapy following lumbar fusion surgery is variably prescribed, with the goals of pain relief and return to activity. However, existing evidence on the efficacy of postoperative PT after spine surgery is heterogeneous and generally low-quality. Furthermore, the impact of PT on opioid use following lumbar fusion has been minimally studied.

Methods: All patients underwent single-level lumbar fusion surgery at a single tertiary academic institution. Insurance claims data was reviewed to determine which patients utilized outpatient PT in the 180 days postoperatively. Patient demographics, surgical variables, surgical outcomes, and PROMs were compared between patients with postoperative PT and those without. The state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) database was utilized to record prescription opioid use in the 1-year preoperative and 1-year postoperative periods. Multivariate regression analyses were created to examine the impact of PT on postoperative opioid use.

Results: A total of 365 patients were included; 187 patients received postoperative PT while 178 did not. There were no differences in demographics/surgical variables, surgical outcomes, or PROMs between groups. There was no difference in preoperative or postoperative opioid use, total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), or total opioid prescriptions between groups. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the use of PT was not a significant predictor of MME consumption at any time point after surgery.

Conclusion: PT does not appear to increase complications after single-level lumbar fusion, and thus is likely a safe consideration during recovery. However, it may not significantly improve outcomes or reduce opioid consumption when implemented routinely for all patients. Surgeons should consider individual patient risk factors when deciding on optimal postoperative management.

术后物理治疗是否影响单节段腰椎融合术后的疼痛、阿片类药物消耗和临床结果?
研究设计:回顾性队列。目的:确定单节段腰椎融合术后物理治疗(PT)对阿片类药物消耗、手术结果和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的影响。背景资料总结:腰椎融合手术后的物理治疗处方不同,目的是缓解疼痛和恢复活动。然而,关于脊柱术后PT疗效的现有证据参差不齐且质量普遍较低。此外,PT对腰椎融合术后阿片类药物使用的影响的研究很少。方法:所有患者在同一所高等院校接受单节段腰椎融合手术。对保险索赔数据进行审查,以确定哪些患者在术后180天内使用了门诊PT。比较术后PT患者和无术后PT患者的患者人口统计学、手术变量、手术结果和PROMs。使用国家处方药监测程序(PDMP)数据库记录术前1年和术后1年处方阿片类药物使用情况。建立多变量回归分析来检验PT对术后阿片类药物使用的影响。结果:共纳入365例患者;187例患者术后接受PT治疗,178例未接受PT治疗。两组间在人口统计学/外科变量、手术结果或prom方面没有差异。两组患者术前或术后阿片类药物使用、吗啡总毫克当量(MMEs)或阿片类药物总处方均无差异。多因素回归分析显示,PT的使用并不是术后任何时间点MME消耗的显著预测因子。结论:PT不会增加单节段腰椎融合术后的并发症,因此在恢复过程中可能是一种安全的考虑。然而,当对所有患者常规实施时,可能不会显著改善结果或减少阿片类药物的消耗。外科医生在决定最佳的术后处理时应考虑患者的个体风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信