The impact of technology on impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420188251346260
Simon A Berry, Iona Goodman, Simon Heller, Ahmed Iqbal
{"title":"The impact of technology on impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Simon A Berry, Iona Goodman, Simon Heller, Ahmed Iqbal","doi":"10.1177/20420188251346260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iatrogenic hypoglycaemia remains a major barrier to optimal glycaemic control required to prevent long-term complications in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). Hypoglycaemia is the consequence of the interaction between absolute or relative insulin excess from treatment and compromised physiological defences against falling plasma glucose. With a longer duration of diabetes and repeated exposure to hypoglycaemia, pwT1D can develop impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). IAH increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia six-fold, causing significant morbidity, and, if left untreated, death. Over the last few decades, a stepwise change in diabetes management has been the introduction and widespread uptake of novel technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. These technologies aim to improve glycaemic control whilst minimising hypoglycaemia. Alarms and safety functions, such as suspension of insulin delivery, can help to reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. This review examines the role of continuous glucose monitors and AID systems in managing IAH, exploring evidence for their impact on symptomatic awareness and identifying areas for future research. In conclusion, there is strong evidence that CGM and AID systems improve glycaemic control and reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. However, despite the use of these technologies, severe hypoglycaemic episodes are not entirely eliminated, and it remains unclear whether their implementation restores the physiological symptoms and counter-regulatory response to hypoglycaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":22998,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420188251346260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188251346260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iatrogenic hypoglycaemia remains a major barrier to optimal glycaemic control required to prevent long-term complications in people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). Hypoglycaemia is the consequence of the interaction between absolute or relative insulin excess from treatment and compromised physiological defences against falling plasma glucose. With a longer duration of diabetes and repeated exposure to hypoglycaemia, pwT1D can develop impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). IAH increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia six-fold, causing significant morbidity, and, if left untreated, death. Over the last few decades, a stepwise change in diabetes management has been the introduction and widespread uptake of novel technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. These technologies aim to improve glycaemic control whilst minimising hypoglycaemia. Alarms and safety functions, such as suspension of insulin delivery, can help to reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. This review examines the role of continuous glucose monitors and AID systems in managing IAH, exploring evidence for their impact on symptomatic awareness and identifying areas for future research. In conclusion, there is strong evidence that CGM and AID systems improve glycaemic control and reduce the hypoglycaemia burden. However, despite the use of these technologies, severe hypoglycaemic episodes are not entirely eliminated, and it remains unclear whether their implementation restores the physiological symptoms and counter-regulatory response to hypoglycaemia.

技术对1型糖尿病患者低血糖认知受损的影响。
医源性低血糖仍然是预防1型糖尿病(pwT1D)患者长期并发症所需的最佳血糖控制的主要障碍。低血糖是治疗产生的绝对或相对胰岛素过量与生理防御能力受损相互作用的结果。随着糖尿病持续时间的延长和反复暴露于低血糖,pwT1D可发展为低血糖意识受损(IAH)。IAH使严重低血糖的风险增加6倍,引起严重的发病率,如果不及时治疗,可能导致死亡。在过去的几十年里,糖尿病管理的逐步变化是新技术的引入和广泛采用,包括连续血糖监测(CGM)和自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统。这些技术旨在改善血糖控制,同时尽量减少低血糖。警报和安全功能,如暂停胰岛素输送,可以帮助减轻低血糖负担。这篇综述探讨了连续血糖监测仪和AID系统在治疗IAH中的作用,探讨了它们对症状意识影响的证据,并确定了未来研究的领域。总之,有强有力的证据表明,CGM和AID系统可以改善血糖控制,减轻低血糖负担。然而,尽管使用了这些技术,严重的低血糖发作并没有完全消除,并且尚不清楚它们的实施是否恢复了低血糖的生理症状和反调节反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of endocrinology and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信