An end to genetic exceptionalism: reframing the ethics of genomic sequencing for rapid neonatal diagnosis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kaiulani S Shulman, Kristen Fishler Malone, Hadley Stevens Smith, Bimal P Chaudhari, Monica H Wojcik
{"title":"An end to genetic exceptionalism: reframing the ethics of genomic sequencing for rapid neonatal diagnosis.","authors":"Kaiulani S Shulman, Kristen Fishler Malone, Hadley Stevens Smith, Bimal P Chaudhari, Monica H Wojcik","doi":"10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) is increasingly used as the first-line test for postnatal diagnosis of rare genetic conditions, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). Early concerns regarding the use of broad genetic testing centered on the potential for psychosocial harm, particularly related to unexpected or uncertain findings. As the usage of ES/GS has grown and evolved, the ethical concerns initially raised have not borne out in empirical measurement of patient and family experience. We therefore review the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit with comparison to other standard diagnostic tests that have not elicited similar ethical questioning. We frame this landscape within the concept of genetic contextualism rather than exceptionalism and suggest that this approach may lead to a more productive future for applied genomic medicine, especially for sick neonates and infants in the NICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":21761,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"152110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) is increasingly used as the first-line test for postnatal diagnosis of rare genetic conditions, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). Early concerns regarding the use of broad genetic testing centered on the potential for psychosocial harm, particularly related to unexpected or uncertain findings. As the usage of ES/GS has grown and evolved, the ethical concerns initially raised have not borne out in empirical measurement of patient and family experience. We therefore review the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit with comparison to other standard diagnostic tests that have not elicited similar ethical questioning. We frame this landscape within the concept of genetic contextualism rather than exceptionalism and suggest that this approach may lead to a more productive future for applied genomic medicine, especially for sick neonates and infants in the NICU.

结束遗传例外论:重构用于新生儿快速诊断的基因组测序伦理。
外显子组或基因组测序(ES/GS)越来越多地被用作产后罕见遗传疾病诊断的一线检测,特别是在重症监护病房(icu)。早期对广泛使用基因检测的关注集中在潜在的社会心理伤害上,特别是与意外或不确定的结果有关。随着ES/GS的使用不断发展和演变,最初提出的伦理问题并没有在患者和家庭经验的实证测量中得到证实。因此,我们回顾了诊断基因组测序在新生儿重症监护病房的使用,并与其他标准诊断测试进行了比较,这些测试没有引起类似的伦理质疑。我们在遗传情境主义而非例外论的概念中构建了这一景观,并建议这种方法可能会导致应用基因组医学的更富有成效的未来,特别是对新生儿和新生儿重症监护病房的婴儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in perinatology
Seminars in perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Seminars in Perinatology is to provide authoritative and comprehensive reviews of a single topic of interest to professionals who care for the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. The journal''s readership includes perinatologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, epidemiologists, students in these fields, and others. Each issue offers a comprehensive review of an individual topic, with emphasis on new developments that will have a direct impact on their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信