Total-evidence phylogenetic hypothesis of Hexabothriidae Price, 1942.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Kaitlyn M Dalrymple, Emanuel L Razzolini, Walter A Boeger
{"title":"Total-evidence phylogenetic hypothesis of Hexabothriidae Price, 1942.","authors":"Kaitlyn M Dalrymple, Emanuel L Razzolini, Walter A Boeger","doi":"10.1016/j.parint.2025.103107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For the last 3 decades, the most cited phylogenetic hypothesis of the Hexabothriidae is that of Boeger & Kritsky's [1989, International Journal for Parasitology 19, 425-440] and subsequent revisions. This phylogeny was based on morphologic features and excluded two genera due to the lack of available specimens at the time - since then, four additional genera have been proposed. Furthermore, molecular data for specimens of the family were generated subsequently, including sequences from members of Erpocotyle produced in the current study. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the family is proposed using maximum likelihood analyses of available 18S and 28S rDNA sequences obtained from GenBank and produced herein in conjunction with morphological data sensu Boeger & Kritsky, 1989. A thorough literature review was conducted and morphological character states were updated, included in the total-evidence analysis, and discussed. In doing so, we evidenced consistent support for some intrafamily clades and updated the phylogeny by including recently described and previously excluded genera.</p>","PeriodicalId":19983,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology International","volume":" ","pages":"103107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2025.103107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the last 3 decades, the most cited phylogenetic hypothesis of the Hexabothriidae is that of Boeger & Kritsky's [1989, International Journal for Parasitology 19, 425-440] and subsequent revisions. This phylogeny was based on morphologic features and excluded two genera due to the lack of available specimens at the time - since then, four additional genera have been proposed. Furthermore, molecular data for specimens of the family were generated subsequently, including sequences from members of Erpocotyle produced in the current study. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the family is proposed using maximum likelihood analyses of available 18S and 28S rDNA sequences obtained from GenBank and produced herein in conjunction with morphological data sensu Boeger & Kritsky, 1989. A thorough literature review was conducted and morphological character states were updated, included in the total-evidence analysis, and discussed. In doing so, we evidenced consistent support for some intrafamily clades and updated the phylogeny by including recently described and previously excluded genera.

六蝇科的全证据系统发育假说,Price, 1942。
在过去的30年里,被引用最多的六蝇科系统发育假说是Boeger & Kritsky的[1989,International Journal For Parasitology 19,425 -440]和随后的修订。这种系统发育是基于形态特征,由于当时缺乏可用标本而排除了两个属-从那时起,又提出了四个额外的属。此外,随后生成了该家族标本的分子数据,包括本研究中产生的足尾虫成员的序列。利用从GenBank获得的可用18S和28S rDNA序列的最大似然分析,并结合形态学数据感知(Boeger & Kritsky, 1989),提出了该家族的系统发育假设。我们进行了全面的文献综述,更新了形态学特征状态,纳入全证据分析,并进行了讨论。通过这样做,我们证明了对一些家族内进化枝的一致支持,并通过包括最近描述的和以前排除的属来更新系统发育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology International
Parasitology International 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
140
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Parasitology International provides a medium for rapid, carefully reviewed publications in the field of human and animal parasitology. Original papers, rapid communications, and original case reports from all geographical areas and covering all parasitological disciplines, including structure, immunology, cell biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and systematics, may be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly, but suggestions in this respect are welcome. Letters to the Editor commenting on any aspect of the Journal are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信