Managing Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Rosa Sonja Alesci, Oliver Meyer, Hanno Riess, Axel Matzdorff
{"title":"Managing Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia.","authors":"Rosa Sonja Alesci, Oliver Meyer, Hanno Riess, Axel Matzdorff","doi":"10.1159/000546860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of patients requiring anticoagulation, e.g., for cardiovascular diseases, is increasing, even in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, detailed guidelines and studies are lacking. In clinical trials in ITP, patients taking anticoagulants are usually excluded and patients with thrombocytopenia are often excluded from anticoagulation studies. Our main goal was to highlight factors that influence anticoagulation decision-making in the clinical routine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey to explore the preferred management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with ITP. It presented common patient scenarios and elicited factors influencing decisions regarding whether to initiate anticoagulation therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We surveyed 235 colleagues in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. A total of 210 respondents specialized in hematology; 13 had advanced training in hemostaseology. About half (110/210; 55%) of participants treat 5-10 patients with ITP per month. The recommended platelet thresholds for antithrombotic therapy were similar among patients with ITP. Most participants recommended a minimum platelet count of 50 × 109/L for anticoagulation therapy in most scenarios. However, there was great variability in individual practice patterns among the respondents. The psychosocial status of patients was important for decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deciding on anticoagulation therapy in patients with ITP remains challenging. Our survey illustrated the diverse perspectives of medical professionals on managing anticoagulation therapy in ITP. A platelet count of >50 × 109/L was considered safe. In patients with lower platelet counts, other influencing factors such as bleeding tendency, comorbidities, and psychosocial status become relevant. Our findings emphasize the importance of balanced clinical judgment, the need for evidence-based guidelines, and open discussions with patients to optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The number of patients requiring anticoagulation, e.g., for cardiovascular diseases, is increasing, even in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, detailed guidelines and studies are lacking. In clinical trials in ITP, patients taking anticoagulants are usually excluded and patients with thrombocytopenia are often excluded from anticoagulation studies. Our main goal was to highlight factors that influence anticoagulation decision-making in the clinical routine.

Methods: We conducted a survey to explore the preferred management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with ITP. It presented common patient scenarios and elicited factors influencing decisions regarding whether to initiate anticoagulation therapy.

Results: We surveyed 235 colleagues in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. A total of 210 respondents specialized in hematology; 13 had advanced training in hemostaseology. About half (110/210; 55%) of participants treat 5-10 patients with ITP per month. The recommended platelet thresholds for antithrombotic therapy were similar among patients with ITP. Most participants recommended a minimum platelet count of 50 × 109/L for anticoagulation therapy in most scenarios. However, there was great variability in individual practice patterns among the respondents. The psychosocial status of patients was important for decision-making.

Conclusion: Deciding on anticoagulation therapy in patients with ITP remains challenging. Our survey illustrated the diverse perspectives of medical professionals on managing anticoagulation therapy in ITP. A platelet count of >50 × 109/L was considered safe. In patients with lower platelet counts, other influencing factors such as bleeding tendency, comorbidities, and psychosocial status become relevant. Our findings emphasize the importance of balanced clinical judgment, the need for evidence-based guidelines, and open discussions with patients to optimize treatment strategies.

免疫血小板减少症患者的抗血栓治疗管理。
导论:需要抗凝治疗的患者数量正在增加,例如心血管疾病患者,即使是患有免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的患者。然而,缺乏详细的指导方针和研究。在ITP的临床试验中,服用抗凝药物的患者通常被排除在外,血小板减少患者也经常被排除在抗凝研究之外。我们的主要目的是强调影响临床常规抗凝决策的因素。方法:通过调查探讨ITP患者抗凝治疗的首选管理方法。它提出了常见的患者情况,并引出了影响决定是否开始抗凝治疗的因素。结果:我们调查了来自德国、奥地利和瑞士的235名同事。共有210名血液学专业的受访者;13人接受过止血学方面的高级培训。约一半(110/210;55%)的参与者每月治疗5-10例ITP患者。ITP患者抗血栓治疗的推荐血小板阈值相似。大多数参与者推荐在大多数情况下抗凝治疗的血小板计数最低为50 × 109/L。然而,受访者的个人实践模式存在很大差异。患者的心理社会状况对决策很重要。结论:决定ITP患者的抗凝治疗仍然具有挑战性。我们的调查说明了医疗专业人员对ITP患者抗凝治疗管理的不同观点。血小板计数为50 × 109/L为安全。在血小板计数较低的患者中,其他影响因素如出血倾向、合并症和社会心理状况变得相关。我们的研究结果强调了平衡临床判断的重要性,需要循证指南,并与患者公开讨论以优化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信