Validation of the COTS Calculator for Tubercular Uveitis: Predictive Performance and Diagnostic Utility in an Indian Cohort.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Janakiraman Palani, Carlos Cifuentes Gonzalez, Gazal Patnaik, William Rojas-Carabali, Ludi Zhang, Zheng Xian Thng, Bernett Lee, Rupesh Agrawal, Jyotirmay Biswas
{"title":"Validation of the COTS Calculator for Tubercular Uveitis: Predictive Performance and Diagnostic Utility in an Indian Cohort.","authors":"Janakiraman Palani, Carlos Cifuentes Gonzalez, Gazal Patnaik, William Rojas-Carabali, Ludi Zhang, Zheng Xian Thng, Bernett Lee, Rupesh Agrawal, Jyotirmay Biswas","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2517309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diagnosing ocular tuberculosis (OTB) is clinically challenging due to its paucibacillary nature and lack of definitive diagnostic tests. The Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) Calculator was developed as a clinical decision-support tool to guide anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) initiation. This study externally validates the COTS Calculator in a high-burden Indian cohort and assesses the additive value of radiological and immunological testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 196 OTB patients treated between 2015 and 2022 at a tertiary eye care center in South India. Inclusion required complete diagnostic workup, ≥6-month follow-up post-ATT, and at least one supportive test (TST, IGRA, CT, or CXR). Two thresholds were evaluated: M4I1 (median ≥ 4) and M4I2 (median ≥ 4, IQR ≤ 2). Treatment response and recurrence were primary outcomes. Diagnostic performance was measured using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Composite scores (CT+CXR and TST+IGRA) were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The M4I2 threshold yielded higher sensitivity (83%) than M4I1 (60%) with comparable AUC (0.60 vs 0.58), though at lower specificity (38% vs 56%). Both thresholds achieved high PPV (94%) but poor NPV (11-17%). Composite testing showed similar high PPV (93%) and poor NPV (9-11%). Higher COTS scores and multiple positive tests correlated with favorable treatment response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COTS Calculator, particularly the M4I2 model, provides a useful clinical tool to guide ATT decisions in OTB. While limited in ruling out TB, its integration with radiological and immunological testing supports early treatment decisions in TB-endemic settings. Prospective validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2517309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diagnosing ocular tuberculosis (OTB) is clinically challenging due to its paucibacillary nature and lack of definitive diagnostic tests. The Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) Calculator was developed as a clinical decision-support tool to guide anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) initiation. This study externally validates the COTS Calculator in a high-burden Indian cohort and assesses the additive value of radiological and immunological testing.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 196 OTB patients treated between 2015 and 2022 at a tertiary eye care center in South India. Inclusion required complete diagnostic workup, ≥6-month follow-up post-ATT, and at least one supportive test (TST, IGRA, CT, or CXR). Two thresholds were evaluated: M4I1 (median ≥ 4) and M4I2 (median ≥ 4, IQR ≤ 2). Treatment response and recurrence were primary outcomes. Diagnostic performance was measured using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Composite scores (CT+CXR and TST+IGRA) were also analyzed.

Results: The M4I2 threshold yielded higher sensitivity (83%) than M4I1 (60%) with comparable AUC (0.60 vs 0.58), though at lower specificity (38% vs 56%). Both thresholds achieved high PPV (94%) but poor NPV (11-17%). Composite testing showed similar high PPV (93%) and poor NPV (9-11%). Higher COTS scores and multiple positive tests correlated with favorable treatment response.

Conclusions: The COTS Calculator, particularly the M4I2 model, provides a useful clinical tool to guide ATT decisions in OTB. While limited in ruling out TB, its integration with radiological and immunological testing supports early treatment decisions in TB-endemic settings. Prospective validation is warranted.

结核性葡萄膜炎的COTS计算器的验证:在印度队列中的预测性能和诊断效用。
目的:诊断眼结核(OTB)是临床上具有挑战性的,由于其少细菌的性质和缺乏明确的诊断测试。协作眼结核研究(COTS)计算器是一种临床决策支持工具,用于指导抗结核治疗(ATT)的启动。本研究在高负担的印度队列中验证了COTS计算器,并评估了放射学和免疫学检测的附加价值。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年至2022年在印度南部一家三级眼科保健中心治疗的196例OTB患者。纳入需要完整的诊断检查,att后随访≥6个月,以及至少一项支持性检查(TST、IGRA、CT或CXR)。评估两个阈值:M4I1(中位数≥4)和M4I2(中位数≥4,IQR≤2)。治疗效果和复发是主要结局。使用AUC、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV来衡量诊断效果。同时分析CT+CXR、TST+IGRA的综合评分。结果:M4I2阈值的敏感性(83%)高于M4I1阈值(60%),AUC相当(0.60 vs 0.58),但特异性较低(38% vs 56%)。两个阈值均达到较高的PPV(94%),但较差的NPV(11-17%)。复合检测显示相似的高PPV(93%)和低NPV(9-11%)。较高的COTS评分和多项阳性试验与良好的治疗反应相关。结论:COTS计算器,特别是M4I2模型,为指导OTB的ATT决策提供了有用的临床工具。虽然在排除结核病方面有限,但它与放射学和免疫学检测相结合,支持结核病流行环境中的早期治疗决策。前瞻性验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信