The effectiveness of clinical frailty assessment in older patients with Traumatic brain injury in predicting outcome and quality of life: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elizabeth Cray, Nida Javed Hayat, Chi Ho Song, Max Western, Ellie Edlmann
{"title":"The effectiveness of clinical frailty assessment in older patients with Traumatic brain injury in predicting outcome and quality of life: a systematic review.","authors":"Elizabeth Cray, Nida Javed Hayat, Chi Ho Song, Max Western, Ellie Edlmann","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03659-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ground-level falls are the most common cause of Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leading to emergency hospital admissions, in adults aged 65 years and older. The world's population is ageing and frailty is becoming more relevant in healthcare provision, therefore assessment of frailty on admission is integral to care planning. Identifying whether frailty is a risk factor for poor outcomes may facilitate clinical decision making and direct care appropriately. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical frailty assessment or scale in predicting outcomes in older patients following a TBI, including mortality, functional recovery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. A systematic review of OVID, EBSCO, Elsevier and Wiley from 2005 to 2025. Included a majority of patients aged 65 years and over, diagnosed with a TBI with a validated frailty assessment tool and at least one outcome measure reported. A total of 12 observational studies (464,606 patients) were included, with a mean age ranging between 70 and 83 years. These studies utilised seven distinct frailty assessment tools. Falls from standing were the most common mechanism of injury identified. Frailty was associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality and unfavourable outcome in combination with a reduced Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission. Frailty was an independent predictor of length of hospital stay, discharge disposition and functional recovery but no study used a validated quality of life tool. Various frailty assessment tools demonstrate effectiveness in predicting clinical outcomes when used in combination with patients age, co-morbidity and neurological evaluation. The predictive value of these tools supports their clinical utility in clinical decision making. Further prospective research is needed to understand how frailty relates to longer term outcomes, particularly quality of life, which was not measured in the included studies. Clinical trial number Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03659-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ground-level falls are the most common cause of Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leading to emergency hospital admissions, in adults aged 65 years and older. The world's population is ageing and frailty is becoming more relevant in healthcare provision, therefore assessment of frailty on admission is integral to care planning. Identifying whether frailty is a risk factor for poor outcomes may facilitate clinical decision making and direct care appropriately. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical frailty assessment or scale in predicting outcomes in older patients following a TBI, including mortality, functional recovery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. A systematic review of OVID, EBSCO, Elsevier and Wiley from 2005 to 2025. Included a majority of patients aged 65 years and over, diagnosed with a TBI with a validated frailty assessment tool and at least one outcome measure reported. A total of 12 observational studies (464,606 patients) were included, with a mean age ranging between 70 and 83 years. These studies utilised seven distinct frailty assessment tools. Falls from standing were the most common mechanism of injury identified. Frailty was associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality and unfavourable outcome in combination with a reduced Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission. Frailty was an independent predictor of length of hospital stay, discharge disposition and functional recovery but no study used a validated quality of life tool. Various frailty assessment tools demonstrate effectiveness in predicting clinical outcomes when used in combination with patients age, co-morbidity and neurological evaluation. The predictive value of these tools supports their clinical utility in clinical decision making. Further prospective research is needed to understand how frailty relates to longer term outcomes, particularly quality of life, which was not measured in the included studies. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

临床虚弱评估在老年外伤性脑损伤患者预后和生活质量预测中的有效性:一项系统综述。
在65岁及以上的成年人中,地面坠落是导致紧急住院的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的最常见原因。世界人口正在老龄化,虚弱在医疗保健方面变得越来越重要,因此入院时对虚弱的评估是护理计划不可或缺的一部分。确定虚弱是否是不良结果的风险因素可能有助于临床决策和适当的直接护理。本综述旨在评估临床虚弱评估或量表在预测老年TBI患者预后方面的有效性,包括死亡率、功能恢复、住院时间和出院处置。2005年至2025年对OVID、EBSCO、Elsevier和Wiley的系统回顾。纳入大多数年龄在65岁及以上,诊断为TBI的患者,使用有效的衰弱评估工具和至少一项结果测量报告。共纳入12项观察性研究(464,606例患者),平均年龄在70至83岁之间。这些研究使用了七种不同的虚弱评估工具。站立摔倒是最常见的损伤机制。虚弱与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)降低的30天和1年死亡率和不良结局相关。虚弱是住院时间、出院处置和功能恢复的独立预测因子,但没有研究使用有效的生活质量工具。当与患者年龄、合并症和神经系统评估结合使用时,各种虚弱评估工具在预测临床结果方面显示出有效性。这些工具的预测价值支持它们在临床决策中的临床应用。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来了解虚弱与长期结果的关系,特别是生活质量,这在纳入的研究中没有测量。临床试验编号不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信