Invasive Neurostimulation During Pregnancy for Treatment of Epilepsy and Tourette Syndrome: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498
Anhmai Vu, Aisha Abdulrazaq, Brian Lundstrom, Lauren M Jackson, Jeffrey W Britton, William O Tatum, Cornelia Drees, Elizabeth A Coon, Linda M Szymanski, Gregory A Worrell, Kelsey M Smith
{"title":"Invasive Neurostimulation During Pregnancy for Treatment of Epilepsy and Tourette Syndrome: Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.","authors":"Anhmai Vu, Aisha Abdulrazaq, Brian Lundstrom, Lauren M Jackson, Jeffrey W Britton, William O Tatum, Cornelia Drees, Elizabeth A Coon, Linda M Szymanski, Gregory A Worrell, Kelsey M Smith","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Invasive neurostimulation is rapidly becoming an established option for treatment of neurologic disorders, particularly those that are refractory to pharmacologic treatment. However, there is limited information on the use of neuromodulation during pregnancy. This study explores the safety and clinical outcomes of invasive neuromodulation-specifically vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS)-in pregnant patients with epilepsy and movement disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant patients treated with VNS, DBS, or RNS were identified, and charts were reviewed to extract data on maternal epilepsy/movement disorder, treatment, and pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (9 VNS, 3 DBS, 2 RNS) had 22 pregnancies. Neuromodulation indications included focal epilepsy (n = 6: 3 VNS, 2 RNS, 1 DBS), generalized epilepsy (n = 6: all VNS), and Tourette syndrome (n = 2: both DBS). The average age at implantation was 24.7 years for VNS, 29.6 years for DBS, and 28 years for RNS. Pregnancy complications included miscarriages (n = 4 pregnancies; 1 VNS, 2 DBS, 1 RNS), pre-eclampsia with fetal growth restriction (n = 3: 2 VNS, 1 DBS), and gestational diabetes (2 VNS). In addition, 10 pregnancies (8 VNS, 2 RNS) were complicated by seizure exacerbations. Delivery of eight of the pregnancies (5 VNS, 1 DBS, 2 RNS) was by cesarean section. There were no cases of maternal or neonatal mortality, and there were no major congenital malformations. Owing to exacerbated shortness of breath during the third trimester, 1 patient had her VNS turned off.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Pregnancy complications were consistent with previous reports of patients with neurologic disorders. Despite limitations in sample size and confounding factors related to medication use and neurologic diagnosis, our study suggests that implanted neuromodulation devices do not seem to pose a risk of neuromodulation-related teratogenicity. While these data are promising and may provide some reassurance for patient counseling regarding pregnancy, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Invasive neurostimulation is rapidly becoming an established option for treatment of neurologic disorders, particularly those that are refractory to pharmacologic treatment. However, there is limited information on the use of neuromodulation during pregnancy. This study explores the safety and clinical outcomes of invasive neuromodulation-specifically vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS)-in pregnant patients with epilepsy and movement disorders.

Methods: Pregnant patients treated with VNS, DBS, or RNS were identified, and charts were reviewed to extract data on maternal epilepsy/movement disorder, treatment, and pregnancy.

Results: A total of 14 patients (9 VNS, 3 DBS, 2 RNS) had 22 pregnancies. Neuromodulation indications included focal epilepsy (n = 6: 3 VNS, 2 RNS, 1 DBS), generalized epilepsy (n = 6: all VNS), and Tourette syndrome (n = 2: both DBS). The average age at implantation was 24.7 years for VNS, 29.6 years for DBS, and 28 years for RNS. Pregnancy complications included miscarriages (n = 4 pregnancies; 1 VNS, 2 DBS, 1 RNS), pre-eclampsia with fetal growth restriction (n = 3: 2 VNS, 1 DBS), and gestational diabetes (2 VNS). In addition, 10 pregnancies (8 VNS, 2 RNS) were complicated by seizure exacerbations. Delivery of eight of the pregnancies (5 VNS, 1 DBS, 2 RNS) was by cesarean section. There were no cases of maternal or neonatal mortality, and there were no major congenital malformations. Owing to exacerbated shortness of breath during the third trimester, 1 patient had her VNS turned off.

Discussion: Pregnancy complications were consistent with previous reports of patients with neurologic disorders. Despite limitations in sample size and confounding factors related to medication use and neurologic diagnosis, our study suggests that implanted neuromodulation devices do not seem to pose a risk of neuromodulation-related teratogenicity. While these data are promising and may provide some reassurance for patient counseling regarding pregnancy, further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary.

妊娠期有创性神经刺激治疗癫痫和抽动秽语综合征:母体和胎儿的结局。
背景和目的:侵入性神经刺激正迅速成为治疗神经系统疾病的一种既定选择,特别是那些难以药物治疗的神经系统疾病。然而,关于怀孕期间使用神经调节的信息有限。本研究探讨了侵袭性神经调节-特异性迷走神经刺激(VNS),深部脑刺激(DBS)和反应性神经刺激(RNS)-在妊娠癫痫和运动障碍患者中的安全性和临床结果。方法:选取经VNS、DBS或RNS治疗的孕妇,通过图表提取孕妇癫痫/运动障碍、治疗和妊娠的数据。结果:14例患者(VNS 9例,DBS 3例,RNS 2例)共发生22次妊娠。神经调节适应症包括局灶性癫痫(n = 6: 3个VNS, 2个RNS, 1个DBS),全身性癫痫(n = 6:所有VNS)和妥瑞特综合征(n = 2:两种DBS)。VNS的平均植入年龄为24.7岁,DBS为29.6岁,RNS为28岁。妊娠并发症包括流产(n = 4次妊娠;1例VNS, 2例DBS, 1例RNS),先兆子痫合并胎儿生长受限(n = 3: 2例VNS, 1例DBS)和妊娠糖尿病(2例VNS)。另外,10例妊娠(8例VNS, 2例RNS)并发发作加重。经剖宫产分娩8例(5例中速妊娠,1例DBS妊娠,2例RNS妊娠)。没有产妇或新生儿死亡病例,也没有重大先天性畸形。由于妊娠晚期呼吸急促加剧,1例患者的VNS关闭。讨论:妊娠并发症与先前报道的神经系统疾病患者一致。尽管样本量和与药物使用和神经系统诊断相关的混杂因素有限,但我们的研究表明,植入的神经调节装置似乎不会造成神经调节相关致畸的风险。虽然这些数据很有希望,并可能为患者提供一些关于怀孕的咨询,但进一步的研究需要更大的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信