Medico-legal features of rifled weapons discharge fatalities in Rome (Italy) and analysis of the differences in internal bullet wound paths between suicide and homicide.
{"title":"Medico-legal features of rifled weapons discharge fatalities in Rome (Italy) and analysis of the differences in internal bullet wound paths between suicide and homicide.","authors":"Alessandro Mauro Tavone, Raimondo Vella, Giulia Ceccobelli, Giorgia Piizzi, Giulia Petroni, Fabio Guidato, Naomi Romaniello, Gabriele Giuga, Gian Luca Marella","doi":"10.1177/00258024251350785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Firearm wounds reppresent a significant cause of mortality worldwide. The differentiation between suicide, homicide, and accidental incidents can be complex, particularly in the absence of clear injuries linked to third-party involvement. Autopsy characteristics of wounds are pivotal in determining the manner of death. A review of the Institute of Legal Medicine of the University of Rome Tor Vergata's database identified 64 deaths due to rifled weapon discharge wounds, excluding accidental deaths. We recorded demographic, circumstantial, and autopsy data for homicides and suicides, with a focus on bullet intrasomatic wound paths analysis. Differences in frequencies of circumstantial data were observed, notably in the locations where victims' bodies were discovered. Autopsy findings revealed distinct anatomical wound distribution. Bullet wound paths across three anatomical planes indicated patterns associated with the manner of death. Leftward, upward, and backward pathways were unique to suicides, while frontward and rightward pathways strongly indicated homicide. Therefore, comprehensive data integration is essential for accurate forensic diagnosis, and projectile directionality alone should not be considered a definitive criterion to distinguish between suicide and homicide, as similar wound paths may arise in both contexts depending on the circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":18484,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, Science and the Law","volume":" ","pages":"258024251350785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, Science and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024251350785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Firearm wounds reppresent a significant cause of mortality worldwide. The differentiation between suicide, homicide, and accidental incidents can be complex, particularly in the absence of clear injuries linked to third-party involvement. Autopsy characteristics of wounds are pivotal in determining the manner of death. A review of the Institute of Legal Medicine of the University of Rome Tor Vergata's database identified 64 deaths due to rifled weapon discharge wounds, excluding accidental deaths. We recorded demographic, circumstantial, and autopsy data for homicides and suicides, with a focus on bullet intrasomatic wound paths analysis. Differences in frequencies of circumstantial data were observed, notably in the locations where victims' bodies were discovered. Autopsy findings revealed distinct anatomical wound distribution. Bullet wound paths across three anatomical planes indicated patterns associated with the manner of death. Leftward, upward, and backward pathways were unique to suicides, while frontward and rightward pathways strongly indicated homicide. Therefore, comprehensive data integration is essential for accurate forensic diagnosis, and projectile directionality alone should not be considered a definitive criterion to distinguish between suicide and homicide, as similar wound paths may arise in both contexts depending on the circumstances.
期刊介绍:
Medicine, Science and the Law is the official journal of the British Academy for Forensic Sciences (BAFS). It is a peer reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the knowledge of forensic science and medicine. The journal aims to inform its readers from a broad perspective and demonstrate the interrelated nature and scope of the forensic disciplines. Through a variety of authoritative research articles submitted from across the globe, it covers a range of topical medico-legal issues. The journal keeps its readers informed of developments and trends through reporting, discussing and debating current issues of importance in forensic practice.