Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S519127
Xiangbin Wang, Tao Li, Yong Li, Yubin Long
{"title":"Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Xiangbin Wang, Tao Li, Yong Li, Yubin Long","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S519127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (P-PECD) has been increasingly used for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), while few studies have reported on its medium-long-term outcomes. This study aims to investigate the medium-long-term efficacy and imaging findings of P-PECD in the treatment of single-segment CSR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 51 patients with single-segment CSR treated with P-PECD were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. Radiologic parameters were measured before and after the operation, including cervical Cobb angle, range of motion (ROM), intervertebral space height, as well as horizontal and angular displacement at the operative level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS scores of neck and arm, JOA score, and NDI were significantly improved postoperatively compared with those before the operation, and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P <</i>0.05). Based on the modified Macnab criteria at the final follow-up, 94.12% showed excellent to good outcomes. Postoperatively, the cervical Cobb angle was 10.63 ± 1.79<sup>°</sup>, ROM was 6.33 ± 1.11<sup>°</sup>, the intervertebral space height was 4.63 ± 0.85 mm, horizontal and angular displacement at the operative level were 0.88 ± 0.68 mm and 4.25 ± 1.04<sup>°</sup>, respectively, and there were no significantly changed at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>P-PECD for single-segment CSR has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, a low complication rate, faster postoperative recovery, and less impact on cervical mobility and stability, which has excellent medium-long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2879-2888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S519127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (P-PECD) has been increasingly used for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), while few studies have reported on its medium-long-term outcomes. This study aims to investigate the medium-long-term efficacy and imaging findings of P-PECD in the treatment of single-segment CSR.

Methods: The data of 51 patients with single-segment CSR treated with P-PECD were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores of neck and arm, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. Radiologic parameters were measured before and after the operation, including cervical Cobb angle, range of motion (ROM), intervertebral space height, as well as horizontal and angular displacement at the operative level.

Results: The VAS scores of neck and arm, JOA score, and NDI were significantly improved postoperatively compared with those before the operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Based on the modified Macnab criteria at the final follow-up, 94.12% showed excellent to good outcomes. Postoperatively, the cervical Cobb angle was 10.63 ± 1.79°, ROM was 6.33 ± 1.11°, the intervertebral space height was 4.63 ± 0.85 mm, horizontal and angular displacement at the operative level were 0.88 ± 0.68 mm and 4.25 ± 1.04°, respectively, and there were no significantly changed at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: P-PECD for single-segment CSR has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, a low complication rate, faster postoperative recovery, and less impact on cervical mobility and stability, which has excellent medium-long-term efficacy.

后经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病:一项至少3年随访的回顾性研究。
背景:后路经皮内镜下颈椎椎间盘切除术(P-PECD)越来越多地用于神经根型颈椎病(CSR),但很少有研究报道其中长期预后。本研究旨在探讨P-PECD治疗单节段CSR的中长期疗效和影像学表现。方法:回顾性分析51例经P-PECD治疗的单节段CSR患者资料。采用颈部和手臂视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和修改的Macnab标准评估疗效。测量术前和术后影像学参数,包括颈椎Cobb角、活动度(ROM)、椎间隙高度以及术中水平和角位移。结果:术后颈、臂VAS评分、JOA评分、NDI均较术前显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。根据最终随访时改良的Macnab标准,94.12%的患者表现为优至良。术后颈椎Cobb角为10.63±1.79°,ROM为6.33±1.11°,椎间隙高度为4.63±0.85 mm,术中水平和角位移分别为0.88±0.68 mm和4.25±1.04°,最终随访时无明显变化。结论:P-PECD治疗单节段CSR具有创伤小、出血少、并发症发生率低、术后恢复快、对颈椎活动稳定性影响小等优点,具有优异的中长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信