Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review (2024).

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Simona Giordano
{"title":"Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review (2024).","authors":"Simona Giordano","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper discusses some of the ethical and legal issues that the recommendations contained in the Cass Review raise. It focuses, in particular, on the recommendation that hormonal treatment in the form of puberty blockers be made available only within a clinical trial. This paper explains why a clinical trial is highly unlikely to expand the evidence base in the way stated in the Review, and that other kinds of research, such as observational and longitudinal studies, are much more likely to be useful in this context. Those other kinds of research, however, are considered by Cass to provide low quality of evidence. In addition to the feasibility of clinical trials in this context, there are important ethical issues, which relate to consent and its voluntariness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the ethical and legal issues that the recommendations contained in the Cass Review raise. It focuses, in particular, on the recommendation that hormonal treatment in the form of puberty blockers be made available only within a clinical trial. This paper explains why a clinical trial is highly unlikely to expand the evidence base in the way stated in the Review, and that other kinds of research, such as observational and longitudinal studies, are much more likely to be useful in this context. Those other kinds of research, however, are considered by Cass to provide low quality of evidence. In addition to the feasibility of clinical trials in this context, there are important ethical issues, which relate to consent and its voluntariness.

保持冷静,但不要继续:《卡斯评论》(2024)提出的伦理问题。
本文讨论了《卡斯评论》中提出的一些伦理和法律问题。它特别侧重于建议仅在临床试验中提供青春期阻滞剂形式的激素治疗。这篇论文解释了为什么临床试验不太可能像综述中所说的那样扩大证据基础,而其他类型的研究,如观察性研究和纵向研究,在这种情况下更有可能有用。然而,卡斯认为其他类型的研究提供的证据质量较低。在这种情况下,除了临床试验的可行性之外,还有重要的伦理问题,涉及到同意及其自愿性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信