SPAN-C: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joseph Chan, Andrew Kneebone, Gabrielle Metz, Jeremy Booth, Meegan Shepherd, Carol Kwong, Chris Brown, Ian Norton, Stephen Clarke, Connie Diakos, Nick Pavlakis, Anubhav Mittal, Jaswinder Samra, George Hruby
{"title":"SPAN-C: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Joseph Chan, Andrew Kneebone, Gabrielle Metz, Jeremy Booth, Meegan Shepherd, Carol Kwong, Chris Brown, Ian Norton, Stephen Clarke, Connie Diakos, Nick Pavlakis, Anubhav Mittal, Jaswinder Samra, George Hruby","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) remains unclear in the setting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to investigate the safety, feasibility and benefits of SBRT for PDAC in a clinical trial setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPAN-C was a single centre, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients with locally advanced, borderline resectable, and metastatic PDAC suitable for high dose radiation were enrolled. Fiducial marker placement was mandated. Following induction chemotherapy, patients were treated with 40-45Gy in 5 fractions of external beam radiotherapy. Freedom from local failure at 12 months was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease recurrence endpoints, acute and late toxicity, surgical outcomes, and palliative endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled. Median follow up of alive patients was 5 years (min 31 months). Twenty-six completed treatment as per protocol. Nine patients (34.6%) underwent a resection, 5 of whom had a R0 resection and 2 had a complete pathologic response. The 12-month freedom from local failure was 100% for the resected subgroup and 76.5% for the unresected subgroup. Seven patients (26.9%) had local recurrences, with 5 of these in the unresected group (29.4%). Median OS was 37.9 months for the resected subgroup and 10.7 months for the unresected subgroup. Three patients had grade 3 acute toxicity, and no patients had late high-grade toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT was safe and feasible with high rates of local control at 12 months and low rates of toxicity. It appears a valid alternative to chemo-irradiation in both the pre-operative and inoperable setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03505229.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) remains unclear in the setting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to investigate the safety, feasibility and benefits of SBRT for PDAC in a clinical trial setting.

Methods: SPAN-C was a single centre, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients with locally advanced, borderline resectable, and metastatic PDAC suitable for high dose radiation were enrolled. Fiducial marker placement was mandated. Following induction chemotherapy, patients were treated with 40-45Gy in 5 fractions of external beam radiotherapy. Freedom from local failure at 12 months was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease recurrence endpoints, acute and late toxicity, surgical outcomes, and palliative endpoints.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. Median follow up of alive patients was 5 years (min 31 months). Twenty-six completed treatment as per protocol. Nine patients (34.6%) underwent a resection, 5 of whom had a R0 resection and 2 had a complete pathologic response. The 12-month freedom from local failure was 100% for the resected subgroup and 76.5% for the unresected subgroup. Seven patients (26.9%) had local recurrences, with 5 of these in the unresected group (29.4%). Median OS was 37.9 months for the resected subgroup and 10.7 months for the unresected subgroup. Three patients had grade 3 acute toxicity, and no patients had late high-grade toxicity.

Conclusions: SBRT was safe and feasible with high rates of local control at 12 months and low rates of toxicity. It appears a valid alternative to chemo-irradiation in both the pre-operative and inoperable setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03505229.

SPAN-C:立体定向体放疗治疗胰腺导管腺癌的II期临床试验结果。
立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过临床试验探讨SBRT治疗PDAC的安全性、可行性和益处。方法:SPAN-C是一项单中心、单臂、II期临床试验。适合高剂量放疗的局部晚期、交界可切除和转移性PDAC患者被纳入研究。基准市场是强制性的。诱导化疗后,患者接受40 ~ 45gy的5次体外放射线治疗。12个月时免于局部衰竭是主要终点。次要终点包括疾病复发终点、急性和晚期毒性、手术结果和姑息性终点。结果:30例患者入组。存活患者的中位随访时间为5年(最小31个月)。26人按照方案完成了治疗。9例(34.6%)患者行肿瘤切除术,其中5例R0切除,2例病理完全缓解。切除亚组12个月的局部失败自由率为100%,未切除亚组为76.5%。局部复发7例(26.9%),其中未切除组5例(29.4%)。切除亚组中位OS为37.9个月,未切除亚组中位OS为10.7个月。3例急性3级毒性,无晚期高级别毒性。结论:SBRT安全可行,12个月局部控制率高,毒副反应率低。无论是术前还是术后,它都是化疗照射的有效替代方法。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03505229。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信