Unplanned Health Care Utilization after Ureteroscopy with Ureteral Stenting: Results from the Study to Enhance Understanding of Stent-Associated Symptoms Cohort.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Brett A Johnson, Jonathan D Harper, Yu-Lun Liu, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Hal D Kominsky, Rebecca D McCune, Alana C Desai, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Naim M Maalouf
{"title":"Unplanned Health Care Utilization after Ureteroscopy with Ureteral Stenting: Results from the Study to Enhance Understanding of Stent-Associated Symptoms Cohort.","authors":"Brett A Johnson, Jonathan D Harper, Yu-Lun Liu, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Hal D Kominsky, Rebecca D McCune, Alana C Desai, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Naim M Maalouf","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Urinary stone disease (USD) often necessitates ureteroscopy with ureteral stenting. We assessed the frequency and risk factors associated with unplanned health care utilization related to ureteroscopy with ureteral stenting within 30 postoperative days, using data from the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS), a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Demographic, medical, surgical, and postoperative data were collected prospectively across four clinical centers for participants undergoing ureteroscopy for USD. Any utilization of health care (urgent care/emergency room or in-person clinical encounter) within 30 days was assessed for potential relationship to the stone procedure. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the associations between potential prespecified covariates and the primary outcome of unplanned encounter (UE). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 484 participants (451 adults) underwent ureteroscopy (424 unilateral and 60 bilateral). Mean age was 49 years, and 47% were female. All postoperative clinical encounters within 30 days were reviewed to determine if they were unplanned and surgery related. Overall, 49 of the participants (10%) had at least one UE within 30 days, and 24/49 (49%) were an emergency room visit and/or hospitalization. Age, race, sex, and previous stone history were not statistically associated with a UE. Participants with a chronic pain condition were three times more likely to have a UE. Surgical duration, use of a ureteral access sheath, stent diameter, or irrigation method did not differ between the groups in a multivariable logistic model. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The prevalence of unplanned health care utilization related to ureteroscopy and stenting for USD in our cohort was 10%. The presence of a chronic pain condition was an independent predictor of a UE. These findings may help identify patients at higher risk of utilizing health care resources following USD surgery and could enable proactive targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary stone disease (USD) often necessitates ureteroscopy with ureteral stenting. We assessed the frequency and risk factors associated with unplanned health care utilization related to ureteroscopy with ureteral stenting within 30 postoperative days, using data from the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS), a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Methods: Demographic, medical, surgical, and postoperative data were collected prospectively across four clinical centers for participants undergoing ureteroscopy for USD. Any utilization of health care (urgent care/emergency room or in-person clinical encounter) within 30 days was assessed for potential relationship to the stone procedure. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the associations between potential prespecified covariates and the primary outcome of unplanned encounter (UE). Results: A total of 484 participants (451 adults) underwent ureteroscopy (424 unilateral and 60 bilateral). Mean age was 49 years, and 47% were female. All postoperative clinical encounters within 30 days were reviewed to determine if they were unplanned and surgery related. Overall, 49 of the participants (10%) had at least one UE within 30 days, and 24/49 (49%) were an emergency room visit and/or hospitalization. Age, race, sex, and previous stone history were not statistically associated with a UE. Participants with a chronic pain condition were three times more likely to have a UE. Surgical duration, use of a ureteral access sheath, stent diameter, or irrigation method did not differ between the groups in a multivariable logistic model. Conclusions: The prevalence of unplanned health care utilization related to ureteroscopy and stenting for USD in our cohort was 10%. The presence of a chronic pain condition was an independent predictor of a UE. These findings may help identify patients at higher risk of utilizing health care resources following USD surgery and could enable proactive targeted interventions.

输尿管镜下输尿管支架植入术后的意外医疗保健利用:来自加强对支架相关症状队列了解的研究结果。
背景:尿路结石疾病(USD)经常需要输尿管镜和输尿管支架置入。我们使用来自一项前瞻性多中心观察队列研究“增强对输尿管支架相关症状的了解”的数据,评估输尿管镜术后30天内与输尿管支架置入相关的计划外医疗保健使用的频率和危险因素。方法:前瞻性地收集四个临床中心接受输尿管镜检查的患者的人口统计学、内科、外科和术后数据。评估30天内任何医疗保健(紧急护理/急诊室或面对面的临床就诊)的使用情况与结石手术的潜在关系。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来评估潜在的预定协变量与意外相遇(UE)的主要结局之间的关联。结果:共有484名参与者(451名成年人)接受了输尿管镜检查(424名单侧,60名双侧)。平均年龄49岁,女性占47%。所有术后30天内的临床遭遇都被回顾,以确定它们是否是计划外的和手术相关的。总体而言,49名参与者(10%)在30天内至少有一次UE, 24/49(49%)是急诊室就诊和/或住院。年龄、种族、性别和既往结石史与UE无统计学相关性。患有慢性疼痛的参与者患UE的可能性是正常人的三倍。在多变量logistic模型中,手术时间、输尿管通路鞘的使用、支架直径或冲洗方法在两组之间没有差异。结论:在我们的队列中,与输尿管镜检查和USD支架置入相关的计划外医疗保健使用率为10%。存在慢性疼痛状况是UE的独立预测因子。这些发现可能有助于识别在USD手术后使用医疗保健资源风险较高的患者,并可能实现积极的有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信