Ru-Yin Tsai, Sheng-Yi Lin, Chin-Chang Chen, Yao Hsiao
{"title":"Efficacy of Acupuncture in Managing Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ru-Yin Tsai, Sheng-Yi Lin, Chin-Chang Chen, Yao Hsiao","doi":"10.7150/ijms.110366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Xerostomia, or dry mouth, frequently affects head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, leading to discomfort and impacting daily functions such as speaking and swallowing. Conventional treatments may offer limited relief and are often accompanied by undesirable side effects. Acupuncture, as a non-pharmacological intervention, is increasingly explored for its potential to mitigate xerostomia symptoms. <b>Objective:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients experiencing radiation-induced xerostomia. <b>Methods:</b> A thorough literature search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science, up to the current year. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated acupuncture's impact on salivary flow and symptom relief in adults with radiation-induced xerostomia. Primary outcomes were changes in salivary flow, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported symptom severity and quality of life metrics. The risk of bias was evaluated, and data were synthesized using a random-effects model. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 RCTs involving 1271 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled data showed a moderate increase in salivary flow in the acupuncture group, effective in both resting and stimulated conditions. Additionally, acupuncture demonstrated significant benefits in reducing xerostomia symptoms and improving quality of life scores compared to control interventions. Subgroup analysis revealed that traditional acupuncture was more effective than Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that acupuncture may be an effective complementary treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia, offering relief from dry mouth symptoms and potentially improving quality of life. Further research should focus on standardizing acupuncture protocols to confirm these benefits across diverse patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 11","pages":"2802-2815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.110366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Xerostomia, or dry mouth, frequently affects head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, leading to discomfort and impacting daily functions such as speaking and swallowing. Conventional treatments may offer limited relief and are often accompanied by undesirable side effects. Acupuncture, as a non-pharmacological intervention, is increasingly explored for its potential to mitigate xerostomia symptoms. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients experiencing radiation-induced xerostomia. Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science, up to the current year. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated acupuncture's impact on salivary flow and symptom relief in adults with radiation-induced xerostomia. Primary outcomes were changes in salivary flow, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported symptom severity and quality of life metrics. The risk of bias was evaluated, and data were synthesized using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 1271 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled data showed a moderate increase in salivary flow in the acupuncture group, effective in both resting and stimulated conditions. Additionally, acupuncture demonstrated significant benefits in reducing xerostomia symptoms and improving quality of life scores compared to control interventions. Subgroup analysis revealed that traditional acupuncture was more effective than Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). Conclusions: The findings suggest that acupuncture may be an effective complementary treatment for radiation-induced xerostomia, offering relief from dry mouth symptoms and potentially improving quality of life. Further research should focus on standardizing acupuncture protocols to confirm these benefits across diverse patient populations.
背景:口干或口干常影响接受放疗的头颈癌患者,导致不适并影响日常功能,如说话和吞咽。传统的治疗方法可能提供有限的缓解,往往伴随着不良的副作用。针灸,作为一种非药物干预,越来越多地探索其潜在的缓解口干症的症状。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估针灸在改善放射性口干症患者的症状和生活质量方面的有效性。方法:在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Central和Web of Science等多个数据库中进行全面的文献检索,检索时间截止到当年。我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct)来评估针灸对成人辐射性口干症患者唾液流动和症状缓解的影响。主要结局是唾液流量的变化,次要结局包括患者报告的症状严重程度和生活质量指标。评估偏倚风险,并使用随机效应模型综合数据。结果:共纳入11项随机对照试验,共1271名受试者。综合数据显示,针刺组唾液流量适度增加,在静息和刺激条件下均有效。此外,与对照干预相比,针灸在减少口干症症状和改善生活质量评分方面显示出显著的益处。亚组分析显示,传统针刺治疗比经皮神经电刺激(TENS)更有效。结论:研究结果表明,针灸可能是放射性口干症的有效补充治疗,可以缓解口干症状,并有可能改善生活质量。进一步的研究应该集中在标准化针灸方案上,以确认不同患者群体的这些益处。
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.