Diagnostic Value of the Combined Detection of Microbiota, Multiple Inflammation-Related Indicators, Serum Lipid Indices, and Tumour Markers in Colorectal Polyps: A Case-Control Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.108819
Limin Zhang, Guoxiu Xiao, Duyao Su, Xun Wang, Cuiting Lv, Chunchun Li, Mingsheng Fu, Liang Song
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of the Combined Detection of Microbiota, Multiple Inflammation-Related Indicators, Serum Lipid Indices, and Tumour Markers in Colorectal Polyps: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Limin Zhang, Guoxiu Xiao, Duyao Su, Xun Wang, Cuiting Lv, Chunchun Li, Mingsheng Fu, Liang Song","doi":"10.7150/ijms.108819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Colorectal polyps have few clinical symptoms, and related tumor markers are unclear; therefore, developing a simple and economical tumor detection index for auxiliary diagnosis is necessary. We aimed to investigate differences in salivary and fecal microbiota, inflammation-related indicators, serum lipid indices, and tumor markers between patients with colorectal polyps and healthy controls, to identify novel non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal polyps. <b>Patients and methods:</b> This case-control study enrolled 47 patients with colorectal polyps and 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls between 13 May 2022 and 20 November 2023. From each participant, we collected salivary and fecal samples, fasting venous blood samples, polyp tissues, and normal intestinal tissues. We then evaluated the diagnostic performance of multiple markers, including salivary and fecal microbiota, routine blood tests, blood lipids, serum tumor markers, and the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, both individually and in combination. The assessment was based on metrics such as the Youden index, sensitivity, and specificity. <b>Results:</b> There were statistically significant differences in several markers between patients and controls. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps using the individual and combined detection of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration, cystatin C, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i>, <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i>, <i>Prevotella intermedia</i>, <i>Ruminococcus gnavus</i>, <i>Bacteroides ovatus</i>, and <i>Parabacteroides distasonis</i> were 0.696, 0.726, 0.742, 0.771, 0.829, 0.731, 0.785, 0.759, 0.738, 0.786, 0.739, 0.764, 0.757, and 0.996, respectively. Combining 13 markers was better than a single marker regarding the diagnostic effect. Compared to that in normal mucosal tissues, the ratio of positively stained areas for NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like proteins containing a caspase recruitment domain, and interleukin-1β was higher in polyp tissues. <b>Conclusion:</b> Detection of salivary and fecal microbiota, multiple inflammation-related indicators, serum lipid indices, and tumor markers can non-invasively and effectively improve the diagnosis of colorectal polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 11","pages":"2757-2770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.108819","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal polyps have few clinical symptoms, and related tumor markers are unclear; therefore, developing a simple and economical tumor detection index for auxiliary diagnosis is necessary. We aimed to investigate differences in salivary and fecal microbiota, inflammation-related indicators, serum lipid indices, and tumor markers between patients with colorectal polyps and healthy controls, to identify novel non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal polyps. Patients and methods: This case-control study enrolled 47 patients with colorectal polyps and 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls between 13 May 2022 and 20 November 2023. From each participant, we collected salivary and fecal samples, fasting venous blood samples, polyp tissues, and normal intestinal tissues. We then evaluated the diagnostic performance of multiple markers, including salivary and fecal microbiota, routine blood tests, blood lipids, serum tumor markers, and the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, both individually and in combination. The assessment was based on metrics such as the Youden index, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: There were statistically significant differences in several markers between patients and controls. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps using the individual and combined detection of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration, cystatin C, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, Ruminococcus gnavus, Bacteroides ovatus, and Parabacteroides distasonis were 0.696, 0.726, 0.742, 0.771, 0.829, 0.731, 0.785, 0.759, 0.738, 0.786, 0.739, 0.764, 0.757, and 0.996, respectively. Combining 13 markers was better than a single marker regarding the diagnostic effect. Compared to that in normal mucosal tissues, the ratio of positively stained areas for NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like proteins containing a caspase recruitment domain, and interleukin-1β was higher in polyp tissues. Conclusion: Detection of salivary and fecal microbiota, multiple inflammation-related indicators, serum lipid indices, and tumor markers can non-invasively and effectively improve the diagnosis of colorectal polyps.

微生物群、多种炎症相关指标、血脂指标和肿瘤标志物联合检测在结直肠息肉中的诊断价值:一项病例对照研究
目的:结直肠息肉临床症状少,相关肿瘤标志物不明确;因此,开发一种简便、经济的肿瘤检测指标进行辅助诊断是非常有必要的。我们旨在研究结直肠息肉患者和健康对照者在唾液和粪便微生物群、炎症相关指标、血脂指标和肿瘤标志物方面的差异,以确定新的无创结直肠息肉生物标志物。患者和方法:该病例对照研究在2022年5月13日至2023年11月20日期间招募了47名结直肠息肉患者和59名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。我们收集了每位参与者的唾液和粪便样本、空腹静脉血样本、息肉组织和正常肠道组织。然后,我们评估了多种标志物的诊断性能,包括唾液和粪便微生物群、常规血液检查、血脂、血清肿瘤标志物和nod样受体蛋白3 (NLRP3)炎性体,无论是单独的还是联合的。评估基于约登指数、敏感性和特异性等指标。结果:患者多项指标与对照组比较差异有统计学意义。受者工作特征曲线分析显示,曲线下面积单独或联合检测中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、平均红细胞血红蛋白(MCH)、MCH浓度、胱抑素C、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、癌胚抗原、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、核梭菌、中间普雷氏菌、瘤球菌、卵形拟杆菌、异象副杆菌分别为0.696、0.726、0.742、0.771、0.829、0.731、0.785、0.759、0.738、0.786、0.739、0.764、0.757、0.996。13个标记联合使用的诊断效果优于单个标记。与正常粘膜组织相比,息肉组织中NLRP3、含有caspase募集结构域的凋亡相关斑点样蛋白和白细胞介素-1β阳性染色区域的比例更高。结论:检测唾液和粪便微生物群、多种炎症相关指标、血脂指标、肿瘤标志物等可无创有效提高结直肠息肉的诊断水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信