A study on the prediction of targeted therapy efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations using CT-based delta-radiomics model.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1599206
Zekai Wu, Peiyan Hua, Xiuying Chen, Jie Lei, Laian Zhang, Peng Zhang
{"title":"A study on the prediction of targeted therapy efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations using CT-based delta-radiomics model.","authors":"Zekai Wu, Peiyan Hua, Xiuying Chen, Jie Lei, Laian Zhang, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1599206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of integrated clinical and CT-based radiomic models for assessing targeted therapy efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 106 EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies at the Second Hospital of Jilin University (2020-2023). Patients were classified as responders (PR) or non-responders (SD/PD) based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria, then randomly divided into training (<i>n</i> = 74) and validation (<i>n</i> = 32) cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. We segmented tumor regions on pre-and post-treatment CT scans using ITK-SNAP, then extracted radiomic features and applied mRMR-LASSO (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance-Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator). A delta-radiomics model was developed by quantifying feature changes between treatment phases. Significant clinical predictors identified by logistic regression were integrated with radiomic features to build a combined model. Performance was assessed via AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), DeLong's test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pre-treatment radiomics model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.751, 0.690, 0.737, 0.639, 0.683, and 0.697; in validation cohorts, these values were 0.726, 0.656, 0.778, 0.500, 0.667, and 0.636. In the delta-radiomics model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.906, 0.865, 0.868, 0.861, 0.868, and 0.861, vs. 0.825, 0.719, 0.722, 0.714, 0.765, and 0.667 in validation. For the clinical model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.828, 0.729, 0.737, 0.722, 0.737, and 0.722, compared to 0.766, 0.750, 0.722, 0.786, 0.812, and 0.688 in validation. In the combined model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.977, 0.946, 0.947, 0.944, 0.947, and 0.944, while in the validation cohorts, these values were 0.913, 0.781, 0.778, 0.786, 0.824, and 0.733.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined model integrating delta-radiomics with clinical predictors demonstrates superior predictive performance for evaluating targeted therapy efficacy in EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma, significantly outperforming conventional radiomics models relying exclusively on pre-treatment imaging data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1599206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1599206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of integrated clinical and CT-based radiomic models for assessing targeted therapy efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutations.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 106 EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies at the Second Hospital of Jilin University (2020-2023). Patients were classified as responders (PR) or non-responders (SD/PD) based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria, then randomly divided into training (n = 74) and validation (n = 32) cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. We segmented tumor regions on pre-and post-treatment CT scans using ITK-SNAP, then extracted radiomic features and applied mRMR-LASSO (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance-Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator). A delta-radiomics model was developed by quantifying feature changes between treatment phases. Significant clinical predictors identified by logistic regression were integrated with radiomic features to build a combined model. Performance was assessed via AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), DeLong's test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results: In the pre-treatment radiomics model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.751, 0.690, 0.737, 0.639, 0.683, and 0.697; in validation cohorts, these values were 0.726, 0.656, 0.778, 0.500, 0.667, and 0.636. In the delta-radiomics model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.906, 0.865, 0.868, 0.861, 0.868, and 0.861, vs. 0.825, 0.719, 0.722, 0.714, 0.765, and 0.667 in validation. For the clinical model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.828, 0.729, 0.737, 0.722, 0.737, and 0.722, compared to 0.766, 0.750, 0.722, 0.786, 0.812, and 0.688 in validation. In the combined model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.977, 0.946, 0.947, 0.944, 0.947, and 0.944, while in the validation cohorts, these values were 0.913, 0.781, 0.778, 0.786, 0.824, and 0.733.

Conclusion: The combined model integrating delta-radiomics with clinical predictors demonstrates superior predictive performance for evaluating targeted therapy efficacy in EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma, significantly outperforming conventional radiomics models relying exclusively on pre-treatment imaging data.

基于ct的δ放射组学模型预测EGFR突变晚期肺腺癌患者靶向治疗疗效的研究
目的:本研究旨在评估综合临床和基于ct的放射组学模型在评估EGFR(表皮生长因子受体)突变晚期肺腺癌患者靶向治疗疗效方面的预测性能。材料与方法:本回顾性研究纳入2020-2023年吉林大学第二医院接受靶向治疗的106例egfr突变晚期肺腺癌患者。根据RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1标准将患者分为反应者(PR)或无反应者(SD/PD),然后按7:3的比例随机分为训练组(n = 74)和验证组(n = 32)。我们使用ITK-SNAP在治疗前和治疗后的CT扫描上分割肿瘤区域,然后提取放射学特征并应用mRMR-LASSO(最小冗余最大相关最小绝对收缩和选择算子)。通过量化治疗阶段之间的特征变化,建立了delta放射组学模型。通过逻辑回归识别的重要临床预测因子与放射学特征相结合,建立联合模型。通过AUC、敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、DeLong试验、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评估疗效。结果:在治疗前放射组学模型中,训练队列的AUC、准确度、灵敏度、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.751、0.690、0.737、0.639、0.683和0.697;在验证队列中,这些值分别为0.726、0.656、0.778、0.500、0.667和0.636。在delta-radiomics模型中,训练队列的AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.906、0.865、0.868、0.861、0.868和0.861,而验证组的AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.825、0.719、0.722、0.714、0.765和0.667。对于临床模型,训练队列的AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.828、0.729、0.737、0.722、0.737和0.722,而验证队列的AUC、准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.766、0.750、0.722、0.786、0.812和0.688。在联合模型中,训练队列的AUC、准确度、灵敏度、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.977、0.946、0.947、0.944、0.947和0.944,验证队列的AUC、准确度、灵敏度、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.913、0.781、0.778、0.786、0.824和0.733。结论:将delta放射组学与临床预测因子相结合的联合模型在评估egfr突变的晚期肺腺癌靶向治疗疗效方面具有优越的预测性能,显著优于仅依赖治疗前影像学数据的传统放射组学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信