Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pestle Needle Therapy in Managing Insomnia, Cervical Spondylosis and Other Systemic Diseases.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Jiaqi Wang, Yingchao Wang, Shudan Yu, Shujun Li, Ning Liu, Genghui Zhang
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pestle Needle Therapy in Managing Insomnia, Cervical Spondylosis and Other Systemic Diseases.","authors":"Jiaqi Wang, Yingchao Wang, Shudan Yu, Shujun Li, Ning Liu, Genghui Zhang","doi":"10.1159/000546785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the efficacy and safety of pestle needle therapy (PNT) across several prevalent conditions, including insomnia, cervical spondylosis, lumbar disc herniation and other systemic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched eight databases (SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) from inception to 31 December 2023, using both subject terms and free-text terms related to 'pestle needle' and 'randomised controlled trial'. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated PNT alone or in combination with other therapies were included. Primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 RCTs involving 2,614 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with controls, PNT significantly improved ORR in insomnia (odds ratio [OR] = 4.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.33, 7.09), cervical spondylosis (OR = 4.38, 95% CI: 2.41, 7.97), lumbago and leg pain (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.86, 5.91) and lumbar disc herniation (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.29). Regarding cervical spondylosis, the intervention of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (Z = 4.84, P < 0.001). In terms of low back pain and leg pain, the intervention of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (Z = 4.07, P < 0.001). The intervention of the observation group was significantly better than in the control group in improving the total effective rate of the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (Z = 2.37, P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pestle needle therapy is a safe and effective treatment modality that can complement or substitute conventional interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis contributes to the evidence base for acupuncture-related therapies, highlighting the potential of PNT to address both musculoskeletal and neurological conditions, thus offering new clinical options and underscoring the need for large-scale, high-quality RCTs to refine treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of pestle needle therapy (PNT) across several prevalent conditions, including insomnia, cervical spondylosis, lumbar disc herniation and other systemic diseases.

Methods: We searched eight databases (SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) from inception to 31 December 2023, using both subject terms and free-text terms related to 'pestle needle' and 'randomised controlled trial'. Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated PNT alone or in combination with other therapies were included. Primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events.

Results: A total of 29 RCTs involving 2,614 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with controls, PNT significantly improved ORR in insomnia (odds ratio [OR] = 4.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.33, 7.09), cervical spondylosis (OR = 4.38, 95% CI: 2.41, 7.97), lumbago and leg pain (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.86, 5.91) and lumbar disc herniation (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.29). Regarding cervical spondylosis, the intervention of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (Z = 4.84, P < 0.001). In terms of low back pain and leg pain, the intervention of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (Z = 4.07, P < 0.001). The intervention of the observation group was significantly better than in the control group in improving the total effective rate of the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (Z = 2.37, P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Pestle needle therapy is a safe and effective treatment modality that can complement or substitute conventional interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis contributes to the evidence base for acupuncture-related therapies, highlighting the potential of PNT to address both musculoskeletal and neurological conditions, thus offering new clinical options and underscoring the need for large-scale, high-quality RCTs to refine treatment protocols.

杵针治疗失眠、颈椎病及其他全身性疾病的系统评价与meta分析。
目的:探讨杵针疗法(PNT)治疗失眠、颈椎病、腰椎间盘突出等全身性疾病的疗效和安全性。方法:检索自成立至2023年12月31日的8个数据库(中国医学信息数据库、中国国家知识基础设施数据库、万方数据数据库、VIP数据库、b谷歌Scholar数据库、PubMed数据库、Embase数据库和Web of Science数据库),检索与“杵针”和“随机对照试验”相关的主题词和自由文本词。纳入了研究PNT单独或与其他治疗联合的符合条件的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结局包括总缓解率(ORR)和不良事件发生率。结果:共纳入29项随机对照试验,涉及2614例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,与对照组相比,PNT显著改善了失眠(优势比[OR] = 4.07, 95%可信区间[CI]: 2.33, 7.09)、颈椎病(OR = 4.38, 95% CI: 2.41, 7.97)、腰痛和腿痛(OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.86, 5.91)和腰椎间盘突出症(OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.29)的ORR。对于颈椎病,观察组干预效果明显优于对照组(Z = 4.84, P < 0.001)。在腰痛、腿痛方面,观察组干预效果显著优于对照组(Z = 4.07, P < 0.001)。观察组干预在提高腰椎间盘突出症治疗总有效率方面明显优于对照组(Z = 2.37, P = 0.02)。结论:杵针疗法是一种安全有效的治疗方式,可作为常规干预措施的补充或替代。该系统综述和荟萃分析为针灸相关治疗提供了证据基础,强调了PNT在解决肌肉骨骼和神经疾病方面的潜力,从而提供了新的临床选择,并强调了大规模、高质量的随机对照试验来完善治疗方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信