Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001282
Grégoire Del Marmol, Quentin Moyon, Alain Combes
{"title":"Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Grégoire Del Marmol, Quentin Moyon, Alain Combes","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Temporary circulatory support (TCS) devices play a crucial role in stabilizing patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. They provide essential hemodynamic support and serve as a bridge to recovery, decision-making, heart transplantation, or long-term mechanical circulatory support. However, despite their increasing use, recent trials challenge their impact on survival. This review summarizes recent findings and discusses challenges in optimizing patient selection and device use.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains the most used TCS device. However, evidence suggests it is ineffective as a standalone therapy. Its value may lie in combination strategies, such as pairing with VA-ECMO, to enhance ventricular unloading. Recent randomized trials on VA-ECMO, including ECLS-SHOCK, have been disappointing. They show no survival benefit in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Even well conducted trials face limitations, including heterogeneous patient populations and challenges in endpoint selection, making definitive conclusions difficult. The Impella device showed promising results in the DanGer Shock trial, with reduced mortality compared to standard care. However, concerns persist about patient selection and the unexpectedly high mortality rate in the control group. Meanwhile, the role of temporary right ventricular assist devices is increasingly recognized, particularly in facilitating hemodynamic stability during left ventricular assist device implantation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>TCS has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock, but significant challenges remain. Further research is needed to refine patient selection, improve device integration, and optimize outcomes. Emerging technologies, including biocompatible materials and artificial intelligence for device monitoring, hold promise for advancing the field. Future studies should also prioritize multicenter collaborations and real-world data to address current limitations in evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"444-450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) devices play a crucial role in stabilizing patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. They provide essential hemodynamic support and serve as a bridge to recovery, decision-making, heart transplantation, or long-term mechanical circulatory support. However, despite their increasing use, recent trials challenge their impact on survival. This review summarizes recent findings and discusses challenges in optimizing patient selection and device use.

Recent findings: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains the most used TCS device. However, evidence suggests it is ineffective as a standalone therapy. Its value may lie in combination strategies, such as pairing with VA-ECMO, to enhance ventricular unloading. Recent randomized trials on VA-ECMO, including ECLS-SHOCK, have been disappointing. They show no survival benefit in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Even well conducted trials face limitations, including heterogeneous patient populations and challenges in endpoint selection, making definitive conclusions difficult. The Impella device showed promising results in the DanGer Shock trial, with reduced mortality compared to standard care. However, concerns persist about patient selection and the unexpectedly high mortality rate in the control group. Meanwhile, the role of temporary right ventricular assist devices is increasingly recognized, particularly in facilitating hemodynamic stability during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Summary: TCS has revolutionized the management of cardiogenic shock, but significant challenges remain. Further research is needed to refine patient selection, improve device integration, and optimize outcomes. Emerging technologies, including biocompatible materials and artificial intelligence for device monitoring, hold promise for advancing the field. Future studies should also prioritize multicenter collaborations and real-world data to address current limitations in evidence.

心源性休克的临时循环支持。
综述目的:临时循环支持(TCS)装置在稳定难治性心源性休克患者中起着至关重要的作用。它们提供必要的血流动力学支持,并作为康复、决策、心脏移植或长期机械循环支持的桥梁。然而,尽管它们的使用越来越多,但最近的试验对它们对生存的影响提出了质疑。这篇综述总结了最近的发现,并讨论了优化患者选择和设备使用的挑战。最近发现:主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)仍然是最常用的TCS装置。然而,有证据表明,作为一种单独的疗法,它是无效的。其价值可能在于联合策略,如与VA-ECMO配对,以增强心室卸载。最近的VA-ECMO随机试验,包括ECLS-SHOCK,都令人失望。它们在急性心肌梗死相关的心源性休克中没有生存益处。即使进行得很好的试验也存在局限性,包括患者群体的异质性和终点选择的挑战,这使得明确的结论很难得出。Impella装置在危险休克试验中显示出令人鼓舞的结果,与标准治疗相比死亡率降低。然而,对患者选择和对照组意外高死亡率的担忧仍然存在。与此同时,临时右心室辅助装置的作用越来越被认识到,特别是在左心室辅助装置植入期间促进血流动力学稳定性。总结:TCS已经彻底改变了心源性休克的管理,但仍然存在重大挑战。需要进一步的研究来完善患者选择,改善设备集成,并优化结果。新兴技术,包括生物相容性材料和用于设备监测的人工智能,有望推动该领域的发展。未来的研究还应优先考虑多中心合作和真实世界的数据,以解决目前证据的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信