Enriching patient populations in ICU trials: reducing heterogeneity through machine learning.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001280
Wonsuk Oh, Marinela Veshtaj, Ankit Sakhuja
{"title":"Enriching patient populations in ICU trials: reducing heterogeneity through machine learning.","authors":"Wonsuk Oh, Marinela Veshtaj, Ankit Sakhuja","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite the pivotal role of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care research, many have failed to demonstrate significant benefits, particularly in nutrition interventions. This review highlights how patient heterogeneity affects trial outcomes and explores how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address this issue by identifying subgroups with distinct treatment responses, improving trial design, and enhancing the precision of nutritional interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>RCTs estimate the average treatment effect, which can obscure heterogeneous treatment effects, where some patients benefit while others experience no effect or harm. Recent studies highlight that artificial intelligence techniques such as clustering, predictive modeling, causal artificial intelligence, and reinforcement learning have the potential to individualize treatments and decrease heterogeneity in trials. Digital twins and artificial intelligence-driven adaptive trial designs further enable personalized interventions, optimizing study populations and improving treatment precision.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into clinical trials offers a powerful strategy to refine patient selection, reduce variability, and enhance the detection of meaningful treatment effects. These advancements hold significant potential to transform critical care nutrition research, leading to more precise, personalized, and effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"410-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Despite the pivotal role of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care research, many have failed to demonstrate significant benefits, particularly in nutrition interventions. This review highlights how patient heterogeneity affects trial outcomes and explores how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address this issue by identifying subgroups with distinct treatment responses, improving trial design, and enhancing the precision of nutritional interventions.

Recent findings: RCTs estimate the average treatment effect, which can obscure heterogeneous treatment effects, where some patients benefit while others experience no effect or harm. Recent studies highlight that artificial intelligence techniques such as clustering, predictive modeling, causal artificial intelligence, and reinforcement learning have the potential to individualize treatments and decrease heterogeneity in trials. Digital twins and artificial intelligence-driven adaptive trial designs further enable personalized interventions, optimizing study populations and improving treatment precision.

Summary: The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into clinical trials offers a powerful strategy to refine patient selection, reduce variability, and enhance the detection of meaningful treatment effects. These advancements hold significant potential to transform critical care nutrition research, leading to more precise, personalized, and effective interventions.

丰富ICU试验中的患者群体:通过机器学习减少异质性。
综述目的:尽管随机对照试验(RCTs)在重症监护研究中发挥着关键作用,但许多试验未能证明其显著益处,特别是在营养干预方面。本综述强调了患者异质性如何影响试验结果,并探讨了人工智能和机器学习如何通过识别具有不同治疗反应的亚组、改进试验设计和提高营养干预的准确性来解决这一问题。最近的发现:随机对照试验估计平均治疗效果,这可能会模糊异质性治疗效果,其中一些患者受益,而另一些患者没有效果或伤害。最近的研究强调,人工智能技术,如聚类、预测建模、因果人工智能和强化学习,具有个性化治疗和减少试验异质性的潜力。数字双胞胎和人工智能驱动的适应性试验设计进一步实现了个性化干预,优化了研究人群,提高了治疗精度。摘要:将人工智能和机器学习整合到临床试验中,为优化患者选择、减少可变性和增强对有意义治疗效果的检测提供了强有力的策略。这些进步具有巨大的潜力来改变重症监护营养研究,导致更精确,个性化和有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信