{"title":"Biologic rationale and evidence for high-dose hydroxocobalamin in septic shock.","authors":"Jayshil J Patel, Jason Carr, Rodney Willoughby","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes of review: </strong>The inflammatory response in sepsis raises circulatory levels of gaseous transmitters (gasotransmitters) nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), both of which generate and sustain septic shock. Current best practices, including early intravenous fluid, early antibiotics, and vasopressor support, do not target gasotransmitters. A single 5-g dose of intravenous hydroxocobalamin (high-dose HOC) is a safe intervention that targets circulating gasotransmitters. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of gasotransmitters in septic shock, outline the rationale for high-dose HOC in septic shock, and summarize clinical evidence for high-dose HOC in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>NO and H 2 S are elevated early in septic shock, activate inflammatory pathways, and higher levels correlate with greater severity of illness. Preclinical evidence demonstrates high-dose HOC improves outcomes in models of septic shock by scavenging circulating NO and H 2 S. Multiple case series and a Phase IIa trial show that high-dose HOC is a safe intervention that reduces vasopressor dose in adults with septic shock. Without high-level evidence, clinicians across the United States are using high-dose HOC for adults with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>High-dose HOC is a promising, nontoxic intervention that targets the pathophysiologic pathway of septic shock. Despite compelling observational and Phase IIa trial data, a pivotal phase III trial testing high-dose HOC in adults with septic shock is required before widespread use can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purposes of review: The inflammatory response in sepsis raises circulatory levels of gaseous transmitters (gasotransmitters) nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), both of which generate and sustain septic shock. Current best practices, including early intravenous fluid, early antibiotics, and vasopressor support, do not target gasotransmitters. A single 5-g dose of intravenous hydroxocobalamin (high-dose HOC) is a safe intervention that targets circulating gasotransmitters. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of gasotransmitters in septic shock, outline the rationale for high-dose HOC in septic shock, and summarize clinical evidence for high-dose HOC in septic shock.
Recent findings: NO and H 2 S are elevated early in septic shock, activate inflammatory pathways, and higher levels correlate with greater severity of illness. Preclinical evidence demonstrates high-dose HOC improves outcomes in models of septic shock by scavenging circulating NO and H 2 S. Multiple case series and a Phase IIa trial show that high-dose HOC is a safe intervention that reduces vasopressor dose in adults with septic shock. Without high-level evidence, clinicians across the United States are using high-dose HOC for adults with septic shock.
Summary: High-dose HOC is a promising, nontoxic intervention that targets the pathophysiologic pathway of septic shock. Despite compelling observational and Phase IIa trial data, a pivotal phase III trial testing high-dose HOC in adults with septic shock is required before widespread use can be recommended.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.