The Influence of Renal Function on Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulant Treatment Among Frail Elderly Patients with Non- Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.
Mohammed A Qutub, Alaa S Algazzar, Abdullah K Alassiri, Saud A Albukhari, Abdallah H Bokhary, Alsayed Ali Almarghany, Ahmed AbdElmoez Elsayed, Mohamed M Elbably
{"title":"The Influence of Renal Function on Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulant Treatment Among Frail Elderly Patients with Non- Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Mohammed A Qutub, Alaa S Algazzar, Abdullah K Alassiri, Saud A Albukhari, Abdallah H Bokhary, Alsayed Ali Almarghany, Ahmed AbdElmoez Elsayed, Mohamed M Elbably","doi":"10.1159/000546865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Frail Elderly patients has not been fully established.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the safety and effectiveness related to OACs in Frail Elderly patients with AF and CKD stage II and III.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Frail Elderly patients ≥65 years with AF and CKD who received OAC from January 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively identified. Primary endpoints were composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/SE), and composite of intracranial bleeding (ICH) and/or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Secondary endpoints included any bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 365 patients, of whom 141 (38.6%) initiated warfarin therapy and 224 (61.3%) initiated DOACs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was non-significant, (2.6±1.01 vs 2.8±0.89, p value 0.054), for GFR ≥ 60 and GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m² patients respectively. HAS-BLED score (1.9±0.67 vs 2.3±0.70, p value 0.071) for GFR ≥ 60 and GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m² patients respectively. While the observed incidence of ICH/GI bleeding was numerically higher in patients with GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m², Cox proportional hazards regression did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in hazard between the groups. The incidence of composite IS/SE was 8.5% in GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m² vs. 8.7% in GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m² (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60-1.74, p=0.24). Composite ICH/GI bleeding occurred in 7.1% vs. 9.3% (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45-2.72, p=0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study comparing Frail Elderly patients with NVAF and CKD stage II versus stage III receiving OACs, we observed No significant difference in the risk of IS/SE or ICH/GI bleeding between groups. These findings suggest that within moderate CKD (eGFR 30-89 mL/min), renal function stage may not independently influence OAC-related outcomes when anticoagulation is well-managed. Our results may not generalize to less frail populations or those with advanced CKD. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to provide clearer guidance on the optimal use of OACs in this challenging clinical scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Frail Elderly patients has not been fully established.
Objectives: To determine the safety and effectiveness related to OACs in Frail Elderly patients with AF and CKD stage II and III.
Methods: Frail Elderly patients ≥65 years with AF and CKD who received OAC from January 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively identified. Primary endpoints were composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/SE), and composite of intracranial bleeding (ICH) and/or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Secondary endpoints included any bleeding.
Results: The study enrolled 365 patients, of whom 141 (38.6%) initiated warfarin therapy and 224 (61.3%) initiated DOACs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was non-significant, (2.6±1.01 vs 2.8±0.89, p value 0.054), for GFR ≥ 60 and GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m² patients respectively. HAS-BLED score (1.9±0.67 vs 2.3±0.70, p value 0.071) for GFR ≥ 60 and GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m² patients respectively. While the observed incidence of ICH/GI bleeding was numerically higher in patients with GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m², Cox proportional hazards regression did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in hazard between the groups. The incidence of composite IS/SE was 8.5% in GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m² vs. 8.7% in GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m² (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60-1.74, p=0.24). Composite ICH/GI bleeding occurred in 7.1% vs. 9.3% (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45-2.72, p=0.41).
Conclusion: In this study comparing Frail Elderly patients with NVAF and CKD stage II versus stage III receiving OACs, we observed No significant difference in the risk of IS/SE or ICH/GI bleeding between groups. These findings suggest that within moderate CKD (eGFR 30-89 mL/min), renal function stage may not independently influence OAC-related outcomes when anticoagulation is well-managed. Our results may not generalize to less frail populations or those with advanced CKD. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to provide clearer guidance on the optimal use of OACs in this challenging clinical scenario.
期刊介绍:
''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.