Evaluation of the feasibility of anomaly detection for dose management in PET examinations.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yusuke Fukui, Shogo Baba, Kohei Ohashi, Yukihiro Nagatani, Kazumasa Kobashi, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Harumi Iguchi
{"title":"Evaluation of the feasibility of anomaly detection for dose management in PET examinations.","authors":"Yusuke Fukui, Shogo Baba, Kohei Ohashi, Yukihiro Nagatani, Kazumasa Kobashi, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Harumi Iguchi","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02063-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Owing to the revision of the Medical Care Act in 2020, managing and recording radiation doses in PET-CT examinations have become mandatory. In this study, we investigated unsupervised anomaly detection methods as a potential solution to minimize input errors in dose recordings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data extracted from our database, including patient body weight, positron emission tomography (PET) dose, and dose length product (DLP). Several anomaly detection models, such as one-class support vector machine (OCSVM), Hotelling's T2 method, multivariate statistical process control (MSPC), isolation forest, and local outlier factor (LOF), were applied and compared. The dataset included 3509 entries for model training and 499 entries for evaluation. Anomalies that could be potential input errors were evaluated using metrics, such as precision, recall, F1 score, receiver operating characteristics-area under the curve (ROC-AUC), and precision-recall-AUC (PR-AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated that Hotelling's T2 method and MSPC's T<sup>2</sup> statistic outperformed other models, achieving a recall of 1.0 and AUCs of 1.0, effectively detecting input errors in radiation dose records. Furthermore, our findings suggest that unsupervised anomaly detection can not only identify input errors but also detect excessively high or low radiation doses, contributing to improved dose management in PET-CT examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that unsupervised anomaly detection is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of dose management in PET-CT examinations, enhancing patient safety and compliance with regulatory standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02063-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Owing to the revision of the Medical Care Act in 2020, managing and recording radiation doses in PET-CT examinations have become mandatory. In this study, we investigated unsupervised anomaly detection methods as a potential solution to minimize input errors in dose recordings.

Methods: We analyzed data extracted from our database, including patient body weight, positron emission tomography (PET) dose, and dose length product (DLP). Several anomaly detection models, such as one-class support vector machine (OCSVM), Hotelling's T2 method, multivariate statistical process control (MSPC), isolation forest, and local outlier factor (LOF), were applied and compared. The dataset included 3509 entries for model training and 499 entries for evaluation. Anomalies that could be potential input errors were evaluated using metrics, such as precision, recall, F1 score, receiver operating characteristics-area under the curve (ROC-AUC), and precision-recall-AUC (PR-AUC).

Results: We demonstrated that Hotelling's T2 method and MSPC's T2 statistic outperformed other models, achieving a recall of 1.0 and AUCs of 1.0, effectively detecting input errors in radiation dose records. Furthermore, our findings suggest that unsupervised anomaly detection can not only identify input errors but also detect excessively high or low radiation doses, contributing to improved dose management in PET-CT examinations.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that unsupervised anomaly detection is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of dose management in PET-CT examinations, enhancing patient safety and compliance with regulatory standards.

PET检查中剂量管理异常检测的可行性评价。
目的:由于2020年修订了《医疗保健法》,管理和记录PET-CT检查中的辐射剂量已成为强制性规定。在这项研究中,我们研究了无监督异常检测方法,作为最小化剂量记录输入误差的潜在解决方案。方法:我们分析了从数据库中提取的数据,包括患者体重、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)剂量和剂量长度积(DLP)。对一类支持向量机(OCSVM)、Hotelling’s T2方法、多元统计过程控制(MSPC)、隔离森林(isolation forest)和局部异常因子(local outlier factor)等几种异常检测模型进行了应用和比较。该数据集包括3509个模型训练条目和499个评估条目。使用指标评估可能是潜在输入错误的异常,例如精度、召回率、F1分数、接收器操作特征-曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)和精度-召回率- auc (PR-AUC)。结果:我们证明Hotelling的T2方法和MSPC的T2统计量优于其他模型,召回率为1.0,auc为1.0,有效地检测了辐射剂量记录的输入错误。此外,我们的研究结果表明,无监督异常检测不仅可以识别输入错误,还可以检测过高或过低的辐射剂量,有助于改善PET-CT检查中的剂量管理。结论:这些结果表明,无监督异常检测是一种很有前途的方法,可以提高PET-CT检查剂量管理的准确性,提高患者的安全性并符合监管标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信