Using scores from the 4AT delirium detection tool as an indicator of possible dementia: a study of 75 221 older adult hospital admissions.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rose S Penfold, Emily Bowman, Emma R L C Vardy, Elizabeth L Sampson, Atul Anand, Bruce Guthrie, Alasdair M J MacLullich
{"title":"Using scores from the 4AT delirium detection tool as an indicator of possible dementia: a study of 75 221 older adult hospital admissions.","authors":"Rose S Penfold, Emily Bowman, Emma R L C Vardy, Elizabeth L Sampson, Atul Anand, Bruce Guthrie, Alasdair M J MacLullich","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overall dementia diagnosis rates are substantially below true rates. Hospital admissions of older people involve cognitive and functional assessments relevant to dementia diagnosis. These assessments could be harnessed to contribute to identifying patients for further assessment. Yet relationships of inpatient cognitive tests with known dementia are unclear. The 4AT (www.the4AT.com) assesses for delirium (Scores 4-12) and also cognitive impairment via embedded cognitive tests (Scores 1-3). We investigated relationships between 4AT scores and clinical dementia diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included participants aged ≥65 years admitted as a medical emergency to three hospitals from 4 January 2016 to 4 January 2020, who had the 4AT performed on admission. Clinical dementia diagnosis was ascertained from linked primary care, hospital discharge and community prescribing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 75 221 admissions, 62 188 (82.7%; 33 625 unique patients; mean age 80.2 years; 55.8% female) had a 4AT on admission. Of these, 9948 (16.0%) had a recorded clinical dementia diagnosis at the time of admission, with a further 1197 (1.9%) receiving a new diagnosis at discharge. Of admissions with dementia, 9669/11 145 (86.8%) had a 4AT score ≥1 on admission, compared to 14 994/51 043 (29.4%) without dementia.4AT ≥1 had a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.86-0.87) and a specificity of 0.71 (0.70-0.71) in relation to clinical dementia diagnosis. 4AT ≥4 showed sensitivity of 0.50 (0.50-0.51) and a specificity of 0.88 (0.88-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>4AT scores were associated with clinically diagnosed dementia. These results suggest that routinely collected 4AT scores could be leveraged in conjunction with other clinical indicators to identify patients with possible undiagnosed dementia who could undergo further inpatient diagnostic assessment and/or post-discharge specialist follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Overall dementia diagnosis rates are substantially below true rates. Hospital admissions of older people involve cognitive and functional assessments relevant to dementia diagnosis. These assessments could be harnessed to contribute to identifying patients for further assessment. Yet relationships of inpatient cognitive tests with known dementia are unclear. The 4AT (www.the4AT.com) assesses for delirium (Scores 4-12) and also cognitive impairment via embedded cognitive tests (Scores 1-3). We investigated relationships between 4AT scores and clinical dementia diagnoses.

Methods: We included participants aged ≥65 years admitted as a medical emergency to three hospitals from 4 January 2016 to 4 January 2020, who had the 4AT performed on admission. Clinical dementia diagnosis was ascertained from linked primary care, hospital discharge and community prescribing data.

Results: Of 75 221 admissions, 62 188 (82.7%; 33 625 unique patients; mean age 80.2 years; 55.8% female) had a 4AT on admission. Of these, 9948 (16.0%) had a recorded clinical dementia diagnosis at the time of admission, with a further 1197 (1.9%) receiving a new diagnosis at discharge. Of admissions with dementia, 9669/11 145 (86.8%) had a 4AT score ≥1 on admission, compared to 14 994/51 043 (29.4%) without dementia.4AT ≥1 had a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.86-0.87) and a specificity of 0.71 (0.70-0.71) in relation to clinical dementia diagnosis. 4AT ≥4 showed sensitivity of 0.50 (0.50-0.51) and a specificity of 0.88 (0.88-0.88).

Conclusions: 4AT scores were associated with clinically diagnosed dementia. These results suggest that routinely collected 4AT scores could be leveraged in conjunction with other clinical indicators to identify patients with possible undiagnosed dementia who could undergo further inpatient diagnostic assessment and/or post-discharge specialist follow-up.

使用4AT谵妄检测工具的评分作为可能的痴呆指标:一项对75221名住院老年人的研究
总体痴呆诊断率大大低于真实率。入院的老年人涉及与痴呆诊断相关的认知和功能评估。这些评估可以用来帮助确定需要进一步评估的患者。然而,住院患者认知测试与已知痴呆的关系尚不清楚。4AT (www.the4AT.com)通过嵌入式认知测试评估谵妄(得分4-12)和认知障碍(得分1-3)。我们研究了4AT评分与临床痴呆诊断之间的关系。方法:我们纳入了2016年1月4日至2020年1月4日在三家医院作为急诊收治的年龄≥65岁的参与者,他们在入院时进行了4AT。临床痴呆诊断是根据相关的初级保健、出院和社区处方数据确定的。结果:75 221例入院患者中,62 188例(82.7%);独特患者33 625例;平均年龄80.2岁;55.8%为女性)入院时at为4AT。其中,9948人(16.0%)在入院时有临床痴呆诊断记录,另有1197人(1.9%)在出院时接受了新的诊断。入院的痴呆患者中,9669.11 145例(86.8%)入院时4AT评分≥1,而无痴呆患者为14994例/51 043例(29.4%)。4AT≥1对临床痴呆诊断的敏感性为0.87 (95% CI 0.86-0.87),特异性为0.71(0.70-0.71)。4AT≥4的敏感性为0.50(0.50 ~ 0.51),特异性为0.88(0.88 ~ 0.88)。结论:4AT评分与临床诊断的痴呆相关。这些结果表明,常规收集的4AT评分可以与其他临床指标结合使用,以识别可能患有未确诊痴呆的患者,这些患者可以接受进一步的住院诊断评估和/或出院后专科随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信