Ivana Stankov, Andres Useche, Peter Lekkas, Rosie Mae Henson, Irene Headen, Jonathan Purtle, Brent A Langellier
{"title":"Causal Loop Diagrams of Food Systems, Diet, and Obesity: A Scoping Review of Methods, Contextual Factors, and Outcomes.","authors":"Ivana Stankov, Andres Useche, Peter Lekkas, Rosie Mae Henson, Irene Headen, Jonathan Purtle, Brent A Langellier","doi":"10.1111/obr.13966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review characterizes the literature on qualitative systems methodologies that guide interest-holders in developing causal loop diagrams focused on food systems, diet, and obesity. Peer-reviewed research using interest-holder-driven causal loop diagrams to examine food environments, access, purchasing, diet, obesity, and related interventions/policies was included. A comprehensive search of six databases (ProQuest Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare) yielded 40 eligible studies from a pool of 1370 unique records. We synthesize study characteristics, the intended uses of causal loop diagrams, methodological approaches, evaluation processes, and key findings. While all studies identified individual and behavioral drivers of obesity, studies based in the Global South more frequently featured structural factors such as racism, discrimination, crime, and incarceration. Papers focused on engaging minoritized populations similarly emphasized structural-level themes such as urban agriculture, gentrification, community investment, and capacity building. Our findings highlight the potential of causal loop diagrams to capture the interconnectedness and complexity of food systems, diet, and obesity, along with gaps in the geographical coverage of study efforts, as well as the representation of key populations in current conceptualizations of food systems. This review offers methodological insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to apply causal loop diagrams to understand and address complex public health issues related to food systems, diet, and obesity within their local contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13966"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This scoping review characterizes the literature on qualitative systems methodologies that guide interest-holders in developing causal loop diagrams focused on food systems, diet, and obesity. Peer-reviewed research using interest-holder-driven causal loop diagrams to examine food environments, access, purchasing, diet, obesity, and related interventions/policies was included. A comprehensive search of six databases (ProQuest Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare) yielded 40 eligible studies from a pool of 1370 unique records. We synthesize study characteristics, the intended uses of causal loop diagrams, methodological approaches, evaluation processes, and key findings. While all studies identified individual and behavioral drivers of obesity, studies based in the Global South more frequently featured structural factors such as racism, discrimination, crime, and incarceration. Papers focused on engaging minoritized populations similarly emphasized structural-level themes such as urban agriculture, gentrification, community investment, and capacity building. Our findings highlight the potential of causal loop diagrams to capture the interconnectedness and complexity of food systems, diet, and obesity, along with gaps in the geographical coverage of study efforts, as well as the representation of key populations in current conceptualizations of food systems. This review offers methodological insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to apply causal loop diagrams to understand and address complex public health issues related to food systems, diet, and obesity within their local contexts.
本综述概述了有关定性系统方法的文献特征,这些方法指导利益相关者开发以粮食系统、饮食和肥胖为重点的因果循环图。其中包括使用利益相关者驱动的因果循环图来检查食品环境、获取、采购、饮食、肥胖和相关干预措施/政策的同行评议研究。对六个数据库(ProQuest Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase和Emcare)进行全面搜索,从1370条独特记录中获得40项符合条件的研究。我们综合了研究特点、因果循环图的预期用途、方法学方法、评估过程和关键发现。虽然所有的研究都确定了肥胖的个人和行为驱动因素,但基于全球南方的研究更频繁地强调了种族主义、歧视、犯罪和监禁等结构性因素。专注于吸引少数群体的论文同样强调了结构层面的主题,如城市农业、中产阶级化、社区投资和能力建设。我们的研究结果强调了因果循环图在捕捉粮食系统、饮食和肥胖的相互联系和复杂性方面的潜力,以及研究工作的地理覆盖范围的差距,以及当前粮食系统概念化中关键人群的代表性。本综述为寻求应用因果循环图来理解和解决当地环境中与食物系统、饮食和肥胖相关的复杂公共卫生问题的研究人员和从业人员提供了方法学见解。
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.