Efficiency of AIMS: A 4-Week Recovery Oriented Suicide Prevention Pathway

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Manaan Kar Ray, Annabelle Groth, Nicola Geffen, Melanie Gregory, Eliza Farley, Abigail Lane, Muthur Anand, Chiara Lombardo, Marianne Wyder
{"title":"Efficiency of AIMS: A 4-Week Recovery Oriented Suicide Prevention Pathway","authors":"Manaan Kar Ray,&nbsp;Annabelle Groth,&nbsp;Nicola Geffen,&nbsp;Melanie Gregory,&nbsp;Eliza Farley,&nbsp;Abigail Lane,&nbsp;Muthur Anand,&nbsp;Chiara Lombardo,&nbsp;Marianne Wyder","doi":"10.1111/inm.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global rise in presentations to emergency departments (EDs) for suicidal crises has created significant challenges for healthcare systems. Traditional approaches often emphasise containment and risk aversion, leading to prolonged ED stays and resource-intensive inpatient admissions. A large Australian metropolitan mental health service introduced a Wellbeing Team (WBT), and trialled the recovery-oriented AIMS (assessment, intervention, monitoring, step up/down) pathway. Grounded in the PROTECT framework, its focus is on person-centred care, integrating positive risk-taking and collaborative safety planning to stabilise individuals and reduce reliance on public mental health services. This study analysed 552 people referred to the WBT over 32 months, primarily from EDs (47.1%) and acute care teams (47.5%). The population predominantly consisted of women (63.2%), with a mean age of 27.9 years. The most common diagnoses were adjustment disorders (30.4%), depressive episodes (22.3%) and emotionally unstable personality disorder (14.7%). The WBT provided tailored interventions, including motivational interviewing, safety planning, distress tolerance techniques and psychopharmacological optimisation, guided by tools like the DESPAIR safety formulation. Outcomes revealed significant system efficiencies, with only 3.8% of participants requiring ongoing public mental health support. Most participants were successfully transitioned to primary care. Six-month post-intervention data showed 76.3% of individuals with no prior public mental health involvement did not re-present, and 60.7% with prior involvement did not require further input from secondary mental health services. These findings demonstrate the efficiency of recovery-oriented care in reducing systemic pressures while fostering sustainable outcomes, underscoring the potential of short-term, intensive, structured interventions like AIMS to transform suicide prevention pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global rise in presentations to emergency departments (EDs) for suicidal crises has created significant challenges for healthcare systems. Traditional approaches often emphasise containment and risk aversion, leading to prolonged ED stays and resource-intensive inpatient admissions. A large Australian metropolitan mental health service introduced a Wellbeing Team (WBT), and trialled the recovery-oriented AIMS (assessment, intervention, monitoring, step up/down) pathway. Grounded in the PROTECT framework, its focus is on person-centred care, integrating positive risk-taking and collaborative safety planning to stabilise individuals and reduce reliance on public mental health services. This study analysed 552 people referred to the WBT over 32 months, primarily from EDs (47.1%) and acute care teams (47.5%). The population predominantly consisted of women (63.2%), with a mean age of 27.9 years. The most common diagnoses were adjustment disorders (30.4%), depressive episodes (22.3%) and emotionally unstable personality disorder (14.7%). The WBT provided tailored interventions, including motivational interviewing, safety planning, distress tolerance techniques and psychopharmacological optimisation, guided by tools like the DESPAIR safety formulation. Outcomes revealed significant system efficiencies, with only 3.8% of participants requiring ongoing public mental health support. Most participants were successfully transitioned to primary care. Six-month post-intervention data showed 76.3% of individuals with no prior public mental health involvement did not re-present, and 60.7% with prior involvement did not require further input from secondary mental health services. These findings demonstrate the efficiency of recovery-oriented care in reducing systemic pressures while fostering sustainable outcomes, underscoring the potential of short-term, intensive, structured interventions like AIMS to transform suicide prevention pathways.

Abstract Image

目的的有效性:4周康复导向的自杀预防途径
全球范围内自杀危机在急诊科(EDs)的上升给医疗保健系统带来了重大挑战。传统的方法往往强调遏制和风险规避,导致急诊科住院时间延长和资源密集型住院。澳大利亚一家大型都市心理健康服务机构引入了一个健康团队(WBT),并尝试了以康复为导向的AIMS(评估、干预、监测、上升/下降)途径。在保护框架的基础上,其重点是以人为本的护理,将积极的冒险和协作性安全规划结合起来,以稳定个人并减少对公共精神卫生服务的依赖。本研究分析了在32个月内转到WBT的552人,主要来自急诊科(47.1%)和急症护理小组(47.5%)。人口主要由妇女组成(63.2%),平均年龄为27.9岁。最常见的诊断是适应障碍(30.4%)、抑郁发作(22.3%)和情绪不稳定型人格障碍(14.7%)。WBT提供了量身定制的干预措施,包括动机访谈、安全规划、痛苦耐受技术和心理药理学优化,这些都是在绝望安全配方等工具的指导下进行的。结果显示了显著的系统效率,只有3.8%的参与者需要持续的公共心理健康支持。大多数参与者成功地过渡到初级保健。干预后6个月的数据显示,76.3%之前没有公共精神卫生干预的个体没有参与,60.7%之前没有公共精神卫生干预的个体不需要进一步的二级精神卫生服务。这些发现证明了以康复为导向的护理在减少系统性压力的同时促进可持续结果方面的效率,强调了短期、密集、结构化干预措施(如AIMS)在改变自杀预防途径方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信