Agricultural Value Chain Development Projects and Household Nutrition in Burkina Faso, Mozambique and Côte d'Ivoire

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Rachel Schurman, William Munro, Thomas Bassett, Moussa Koné, William Moseley, Melanie Ouedraogo, Heidi Gengenbach, Alcino Comé, Justino Nhabinde, Matt Gunther
{"title":"Agricultural Value Chain Development Projects and Household Nutrition in Burkina Faso, Mozambique and Côte d'Ivoire","authors":"Rachel Schurman,&nbsp;William Munro,&nbsp;Thomas Bassett,&nbsp;Moussa Koné,&nbsp;William Moseley,&nbsp;Melanie Ouedraogo,&nbsp;Heidi Gengenbach,&nbsp;Alcino Comé,&nbsp;Justino Nhabinde,&nbsp;Matt Gunther","doi":"10.1111/dech.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Many mainstream development actors and scholars concerned about rural poverty and hunger in Africa recommend integrating smallholder farmers, especially women, into formally structured agricultural value chains (AVCs). This influential approach rests on the assumption that productivity-enhancing technologies and stronger market linkages will raise farmer incomes, and in turn improve food and nutrition security (FNS) in farmer households via increased food purchases. This article tests this assumption using quantitative survey data and qualitative interviews with women farmers who participated in AVC projects in Burkina Faso, Mozambique and Côte d'Ivoire from 2016 to 2020. The survey data show that AVC participation has no statistically significant impact on household FNS or women's dietary quality, regardless of initial household income, type of crop (food, non-food), or market scale (national, regional, global). The qualitative findings explain these results more fully, and reveal major challenges for strategies to improve rural FNS through formally structured AVCs: top-down power dynamics of AVCs do not adequately address smallholders’ needs; participation in AVCs exposes smallholders, especially women, to new types of risk that inhibit their participation; and in increasingly monetized rural economies, women have other spending priorities that compete with food expenditures.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"56 2","pages":"335-371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many mainstream development actors and scholars concerned about rural poverty and hunger in Africa recommend integrating smallholder farmers, especially women, into formally structured agricultural value chains (AVCs). This influential approach rests on the assumption that productivity-enhancing technologies and stronger market linkages will raise farmer incomes, and in turn improve food and nutrition security (FNS) in farmer households via increased food purchases. This article tests this assumption using quantitative survey data and qualitative interviews with women farmers who participated in AVC projects in Burkina Faso, Mozambique and Côte d'Ivoire from 2016 to 2020. The survey data show that AVC participation has no statistically significant impact on household FNS or women's dietary quality, regardless of initial household income, type of crop (food, non-food), or market scale (national, regional, global). The qualitative findings explain these results more fully, and reveal major challenges for strategies to improve rural FNS through formally structured AVCs: top-down power dynamics of AVCs do not adequately address smallholders’ needs; participation in AVCs exposes smallholders, especially women, to new types of risk that inhibit their participation; and in increasingly monetized rural economies, women have other spending priorities that compete with food expenditures.

布基纳法索、莫桑比克和Côte科特迪瓦的农业价值链发展项目和家庭营养
许多关注非洲农村贫困和饥饿的主流发展行为体和学者建议将小农,特别是妇女纳入正式结构化的农业价值链(AVCs)。这种有影响力的方法所依据的假设是,提高生产力的技术和更强的市场联系将提高农民收入,进而通过增加粮食采购改善农户的粮食和营养安全。本文使用定量调查数据和对2016年至2020年在布基纳法索、莫桑比克和Côte科特迪瓦参加AVC项目的女农民的定性访谈来检验这一假设。调查数据显示,无论家庭初始收入、作物类型(粮食、非粮食)或市场规模(国家、地区、全球)如何,AVC参与对家庭FNS或妇女膳食质量没有统计学显著影响。定性研究结果更充分地解释了这些结果,并揭示了通过正式结构化的农村社改善农村FNS的战略面临的主要挑战:农村社自上而下的权力动态不能充分满足小农的需求;小农,特别是妇女,参与农村农业发展,面临阻碍其参与的新风险;在日益货币化的农村经济中,妇女有其他支出优先事项,与食品支出竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信