Ben Stepkovitch, Katherine Tuft, Nathan Manders, Katherine E. Moseby
{"title":"Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey","authors":"Ben Stepkovitch, Katherine Tuft, Nathan Manders, Katherine E. Moseby","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (<i>Dasyurus geoffroii</i>), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for >2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non-significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve-wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post-release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (Dasyurus geoffroii), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for >2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non-significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve-wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post-release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.