Correction to “First evidence of a genetic basis for thermal adaptation in a schistosome host snail”

IF 7.1 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecological Monographs Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1002/ecm.70022

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maes, Tim, Julie Verheyen, Bruno Senghor, Aspire Mudavanhu, Ruben Schols, Bart Hellemans, Enora Geslain, Filip A. M. Volckaert, Hugo F. Gante, and Tine Huyse. 2025. “First Evidence of a Genetic Basis for Thermal Adaptation in a Schistosome Host Snail.” Ecological Monographs 95(1): e70006. 10.1002/ecm.70006.

The Open Access funding statement for this article was missing. The funding statement below has been added to the Acknowledgments section of the article:

Open Access funding was provided by Universitat Innsbruck/KEMÖ.

We apologize for this error.

查看原文本刊更多论文

更正“血吸虫寄主蜗牛热适应遗传基础的首个证据”

Maes, Tim, Julie Verheyen, Bruno Senghor, Aspire Mudavanhu, Ruben Schols, Bart Hellemans, Enora Geslain, philip A. M. Volckaert, Hugo F. Gante和Tine Huyse， 2025。“血吸虫寄主蜗牛热适应遗传基础的首个证据”。生态学报95(1):70006。10.1002 / ecm.70006。这篇文章的开放获取资助声明缺失了。下面的资助声明已添加到文章的致谢部分：开放获取资金由因斯布鲁克大学/KEMÖ提供。我们为这个错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

12.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.