Emily J. Upham-Mills, Andrew D. Crosby, Jody R. Reimer, Samuel Haché, Tara Stehelin, Erin M. Bayne
{"title":"Accurate prediction of olive-sided flycatcher breeding status using song rate measured with autonomous recording units","authors":"Emily J. Upham-Mills, Andrew D. Crosby, Jody R. Reimer, Samuel Haché, Tara Stehelin, Erin M. Bayne","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autonomous recording units (ARUs) are recognized for their use in detecting vocalizing bird species to assess presence, occupancy, and density, but their potential to monitor reproductive status of individuals and reproductive rates is not well known. We investigated whether song rates derived from ARU data, when combined with the known date, can be used to predict the proportion of male songbirds in 3 breeding status classes (single, paired, and feeding young). We monitored breeding status with weekly field visits and collected daily ARU recordings at 46 olive-sided flycatcher (<i>Contopus cooperi</i>) breeding territories in northwestern Canada in 2016–2017. We tested 4 variations of a hierarchical multinomial regression model that used time of day, day of year, and song rate derived from 2-minute recordings to predict breeding status, and evaluated models using a novel, likelihood-based approach. We found the top model correctly estimated 79% of the observed proportions of birds in each breeding status across the length of the breeding season. Although date was the primary predictor of breeding status, singing rate reduced some of the uncertainty and provided more accurate estimates for a given time. A major challenge to prediction accuracy and data interpretation was accounting for bird movement and the associated impact on detection, which we partly addressed by limiting our study to individuals who were detected on at least 30% of ARU sampling days. We demonstrate that ARUs can be used to assess breeding status in a cryptic, low-density species at risk such as the olive-sided flycatcher, suggesting this method could be applied to a wider range of species to better understand demographics and population dynamics, and inform management decisions, for bird species of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autonomous recording units (ARUs) are recognized for their use in detecting vocalizing bird species to assess presence, occupancy, and density, but their potential to monitor reproductive status of individuals and reproductive rates is not well known. We investigated whether song rates derived from ARU data, when combined with the known date, can be used to predict the proportion of male songbirds in 3 breeding status classes (single, paired, and feeding young). We monitored breeding status with weekly field visits and collected daily ARU recordings at 46 olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) breeding territories in northwestern Canada in 2016–2017. We tested 4 variations of a hierarchical multinomial regression model that used time of day, day of year, and song rate derived from 2-minute recordings to predict breeding status, and evaluated models using a novel, likelihood-based approach. We found the top model correctly estimated 79% of the observed proportions of birds in each breeding status across the length of the breeding season. Although date was the primary predictor of breeding status, singing rate reduced some of the uncertainty and provided more accurate estimates for a given time. A major challenge to prediction accuracy and data interpretation was accounting for bird movement and the associated impact on detection, which we partly addressed by limiting our study to individuals who were detected on at least 30% of ARU sampling days. We demonstrate that ARUs can be used to assess breeding status in a cryptic, low-density species at risk such as the olive-sided flycatcher, suggesting this method could be applied to a wider range of species to better understand demographics and population dynamics, and inform management decisions, for bird species of concern.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.