Maris J. Daleo, Lilia Medvedev, Carly R. Harkey, Amber L. Simmons, Kaitlin M. Moorhead, Emily R. Whitmer, Martha A. Delaney, Laura A. Adamovicz, Dave Collins, Matthew C. Allender
{"title":"A longitudinal analysis of pathogen shedding patterns in confiscated eastern box turtles","authors":"Maris J. Daleo, Lilia Medvedev, Carly R. Harkey, Amber L. Simmons, Kaitlin M. Moorhead, Emily R. Whitmer, Martha A. Delaney, Laura A. Adamovicz, Dave Collins, Matthew C. Allender","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eastern box turtles (<i>Terrapene carolina carolina</i>) have experienced population declines due to the illegal wildlife trade and its association with the spread of infectious diseases, yet the dynamics of infections are not thoroughly described. In the fall of 2022, 17 confiscated eastern box turtles arrived at the University of Illinois after being intercepted from the illegal wildlife trade with an initial 41.2% prevalence of frog virus 3 (FV3). We housed turtles individually and tested them for FV3, <i>Terrapene</i> herpesvirus 1 (TerHV1), box turtle <i>Mycoplasma</i> sp. (BTMyco), and <i>Terrapene</i> adenovirus (TerAdv) via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on combined oral and cloacal swabs monthly for 13 months. We used occupancy models to determine unbiased pathogen prevalence and detection probabilities for infected turtles. No turtles tested positive for FV3 after initial testing. Observed pathogen prevalence values were within 10% of unbiased prevalence estimates; however, the probability of detecting pathogens in an infected turtle during a given month was generally low (TerHV1 = 32.7%, TerAdv = 21.2%, and BTMyco = 49.9%). Turtles were intermittently co-detected with both BTMyco and TerHV1 (<i>n</i> = 7), BTMyco and TerAdv (<i>n</i> = 10), and TerHV1 and TerAdv (<i>n</i> = 6). In co-detections, the presence of TerHV1 and BTMyco decreased the detection probabilities of other pathogens. Of the 2 turtles that died, gross and histologic findings included nephritis in both turtles, one of which had severe inflammation, and the other turtle had a large coelomic hematoma. This study provides evidence-based sampling strategies to maximize the detection of individuals infected with common box turtle pathogens. The best detection rate for 2 swabs includes monthly sampling for BTMyco, TerHV1, and TerAdv, but if turtles are housed for longer, 2 swabs every third month should be used for optimal detection. These findings have implications for the design and interpretation of research studies and clinical management of box turtles in managed care and can inform placement and release decisions during confiscation events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina) have experienced population declines due to the illegal wildlife trade and its association with the spread of infectious diseases, yet the dynamics of infections are not thoroughly described. In the fall of 2022, 17 confiscated eastern box turtles arrived at the University of Illinois after being intercepted from the illegal wildlife trade with an initial 41.2% prevalence of frog virus 3 (FV3). We housed turtles individually and tested them for FV3, Terrapene herpesvirus 1 (TerHV1), box turtle Mycoplasma sp. (BTMyco), and Terrapene adenovirus (TerAdv) via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on combined oral and cloacal swabs monthly for 13 months. We used occupancy models to determine unbiased pathogen prevalence and detection probabilities for infected turtles. No turtles tested positive for FV3 after initial testing. Observed pathogen prevalence values were within 10% of unbiased prevalence estimates; however, the probability of detecting pathogens in an infected turtle during a given month was generally low (TerHV1 = 32.7%, TerAdv = 21.2%, and BTMyco = 49.9%). Turtles were intermittently co-detected with both BTMyco and TerHV1 (n = 7), BTMyco and TerAdv (n = 10), and TerHV1 and TerAdv (n = 6). In co-detections, the presence of TerHV1 and BTMyco decreased the detection probabilities of other pathogens. Of the 2 turtles that died, gross and histologic findings included nephritis in both turtles, one of which had severe inflammation, and the other turtle had a large coelomic hematoma. This study provides evidence-based sampling strategies to maximize the detection of individuals infected with common box turtle pathogens. The best detection rate for 2 swabs includes monthly sampling for BTMyco, TerHV1, and TerAdv, but if turtles are housed for longer, 2 swabs every third month should be used for optimal detection. These findings have implications for the design and interpretation of research studies and clinical management of box turtles in managed care and can inform placement and release decisions during confiscation events.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.