Land cover attributes affect the distribution of rooting damage by wild pigs (Sus scrofa)

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Travis E. Stoakley, Joseph W. Treichler, Kurt C. VerCauteren, James C. Beasley
{"title":"Land cover attributes affect the distribution of rooting damage by wild pigs (Sus scrofa)","authors":"Travis E. Stoakley,&nbsp;Joseph W. Treichler,&nbsp;Kurt C. VerCauteren,&nbsp;James C. Beasley","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid expansion of invasive wild pig (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) populations over the past several decades has resulted in an increased distribution of damage to native systems throughout their introduced range. Despite the extent of wild pig damage and growing concerns among land managers, there is limited published data regarding the variability of damage in relation to season and fine-scale land cover attributes. We assessed wild pig rooting damage during the winter (January-March) and summer (June-August) of 2020 along 36 km of 10-m-wide transects on the Savannah River Site (SRS) and 34 km of 10-m-wide transects on privately owned agricultural (POA) properties in South Carolina, USA. We recorded fine-scale land cover attributes at damage and control sites to determine the factors that were most closely associated with wild pig rooting damage. We reported 6,825.5 m<sup>2</sup> of rooting damage over 36 km of survey transects on the SRS and 3,146.9 m<sup>2</sup> of rooting damage over 34 km of survey transects on the POA properties over winter and summer seasons. The average depth of rooting damage was 11.8 cm on the SRS and 11.2 cm on the POA properties. Our modeling results suggested rooting by wild pigs was more likely to occur in earlier winter months, in hardwood stands, proximal to water, and in areas with less ground vegetation and greater stem density, and less likely to occur in areas with greater tree density and near roads. Our results can help facilitate early detection of wild pig expansion by highlighting key areas to monitor for wild pig presence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations over the past several decades has resulted in an increased distribution of damage to native systems throughout their introduced range. Despite the extent of wild pig damage and growing concerns among land managers, there is limited published data regarding the variability of damage in relation to season and fine-scale land cover attributes. We assessed wild pig rooting damage during the winter (January-March) and summer (June-August) of 2020 along 36 km of 10-m-wide transects on the Savannah River Site (SRS) and 34 km of 10-m-wide transects on privately owned agricultural (POA) properties in South Carolina, USA. We recorded fine-scale land cover attributes at damage and control sites to determine the factors that were most closely associated with wild pig rooting damage. We reported 6,825.5 m2 of rooting damage over 36 km of survey transects on the SRS and 3,146.9 m2 of rooting damage over 34 km of survey transects on the POA properties over winter and summer seasons. The average depth of rooting damage was 11.8 cm on the SRS and 11.2 cm on the POA properties. Our modeling results suggested rooting by wild pigs was more likely to occur in earlier winter months, in hardwood stands, proximal to water, and in areas with less ground vegetation and greater stem density, and less likely to occur in areas with greater tree density and near roads. Our results can help facilitate early detection of wild pig expansion by highlighting key areas to monitor for wild pig presence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

土地覆被属性对野猪根系损害分布的影响
在过去的几十年里,入侵野猪(Sus scrofa)种群的迅速扩张导致了在其引入范围内对本地系统的破坏增加。尽管野猪的危害程度和土地管理者日益关注的问题,但关于损害与季节和精细土地覆盖属性相关的变异性的公开数据有限。我们评估了2020年冬季(1 - 3月)和夏季(6 - 8月)在美国南卡罗来纳州萨凡纳河遗址(SRS)上36公里的10米宽样带和34公里的10米宽样带上的野猪生根损害。为了确定与野猪生根损害最密切相关的因子,我们记录了受损点和控制点的精细尺度土地覆盖属性。在SRS上,36 km调查样带上的根系损伤面积为6825.5 m2,在34 km调查样带上的根系损伤面积为3146.9 m2。SRS和POA的平均生根损伤深度分别为11.8 cm和11.2 cm。我们的模拟结果表明,野猪的生根更可能发生在冬季早期,在硬木林分,靠近水,地面植被较少和茎密度较大的地区,而在树木密度较大和靠近道路的地区则不太可能发生。我们的研究结果可以通过突出监测野猪存在的关键区域,帮助早期发现野猪扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信