Rethinking heat in thousands of school classrooms through continuous monitoring and novel exposure metrics

M. Pilar Botana Martinez , Priam Dinesh Vyas , Katherine H. Walsh , Lauren Main , Lauren Bolton , Yirong Yuan , Masanao Yajima , M. Patricia Fabian
{"title":"Rethinking heat in thousands of school classrooms through continuous monitoring and novel exposure metrics","authors":"M. Pilar Botana Martinez ,&nbsp;Priam Dinesh Vyas ,&nbsp;Katherine H. Walsh ,&nbsp;Lauren Main ,&nbsp;Lauren Bolton ,&nbsp;Yirong Yuan ,&nbsp;Masanao Yajima ,&nbsp;M. Patricia Fabian","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global temperatures rise, heat exposure in classrooms is becoming a growing concern for the millions of students attending school, in particular those learning in buildings without air conditioning (AC). With limited resources and competing interests, school decision-makers need health-related data-based approaches to inform cooling solutions and prioritize investments. In collaboration with a large school district in Northeastern United States (US), we analyzed minute-level temperature data in &gt; 3600 classrooms across 125 school buildings during the 2023 hot season. Using a first-of-its-kind commercial-grade indoor sensor network and data science methods, we quantified heat exposure through novel heat metrics capturing intensity, frequency, and duration, and characterized spatial variability within and across buildings with three types of AC. On average, intra-building temperature variability was 2.3 degrees Celsius (°C), with a maximum value of 14.3°C. On a hot day, classrooms exceeded extreme caution thresholds by 0.1 %, 1.1 %, and 8.4 % in schools with central, window, and no AC, respectively. Classrooms on the top floor were 0.3°C, 0.5°C, and 5.7°C warmer than classrooms on the first floor, for central, window, and no AC groups, respectively. Novel and traditional heat exposure metrics were weakly correlated, with implications for school rankings. Findings identified schools with the greatest cooling needs and investigated key predictors of classroom overheating. Our results underscore the need for continuous temperature monitoring in all classrooms and highlight the importance of access to mechanical cooling in locations that have historically not been prepared for extreme heat. Our work shows how data analyses informed by researcher-school partnerships can support critical climate resilience needs in schools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362025000347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global temperatures rise, heat exposure in classrooms is becoming a growing concern for the millions of students attending school, in particular those learning in buildings without air conditioning (AC). With limited resources and competing interests, school decision-makers need health-related data-based approaches to inform cooling solutions and prioritize investments. In collaboration with a large school district in Northeastern United States (US), we analyzed minute-level temperature data in > 3600 classrooms across 125 school buildings during the 2023 hot season. Using a first-of-its-kind commercial-grade indoor sensor network and data science methods, we quantified heat exposure through novel heat metrics capturing intensity, frequency, and duration, and characterized spatial variability within and across buildings with three types of AC. On average, intra-building temperature variability was 2.3 degrees Celsius (°C), with a maximum value of 14.3°C. On a hot day, classrooms exceeded extreme caution thresholds by 0.1 %, 1.1 %, and 8.4 % in schools with central, window, and no AC, respectively. Classrooms on the top floor were 0.3°C, 0.5°C, and 5.7°C warmer than classrooms on the first floor, for central, window, and no AC groups, respectively. Novel and traditional heat exposure metrics were weakly correlated, with implications for school rankings. Findings identified schools with the greatest cooling needs and investigated key predictors of classroom overheating. Our results underscore the need for continuous temperature monitoring in all classrooms and highlight the importance of access to mechanical cooling in locations that have historically not been prepared for extreme heat. Our work shows how data analyses informed by researcher-school partnerships can support critical climate resilience needs in schools.
通过持续监测和新颖的暴露指标,重新思考数千所学校教室的热量
随着全球气温上升,教室里的热暴露正成为数百万在校学生日益关注的问题,尤其是那些在没有空调的建筑里学习的学生。由于资源有限和利益冲突,学校决策者需要基于健康数据的方法,为制冷解决方案提供信息,并优先考虑投资。我们与美国东北部的一个大型学区合作,分析了2023年炎热季节125栋教学楼的3600间教室的分钟级温度数据。利用首个同类商业级室内传感器网络和数据科学方法,我们通过捕获强度、频率和持续时间的新型热度量来量化热暴露,并表征了三种类型交流的建筑物内部和建筑物之间的空间变异性。平均而言,建筑物内部温度变异性为2.3摄氏度(°C),最大值为14.3°C。在炎热的天气里,有中央空调的学校、有窗户的学校和没有空调的学校的教室分别超出极端警戒阈值0.1 %、1.1 %和8.4 %。顶楼教室的温度分别比一楼教室高0.3°C、0.5°C和5.7°C,分别适用于中央、窗户和无空调组。新的和传统的热暴露指标弱相关,与学校排名的影响。调查结果确定了最需要制冷的学校,并调查了教室过热的主要预测因素。我们的研究结果强调了对所有教室进行连续温度监测的必要性,并强调了在历史上没有为极端高温做好准备的地方使用机械冷却的重要性。我们的工作表明,由研究人员与学校合作伙伴关系提供的数据分析如何能够支持学校的关键气候适应能力需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信