Performance evaluation of lightweight clay-air foam embankment on soft Bangkok clay: A full-scale test and 3D numerical analysis

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Phermphorn Buathong , Pornkasem Jongpradist , Pitthaya Jamsawang
{"title":"Performance evaluation of lightweight clay-air foam embankment on soft Bangkok clay: A full-scale test and 3D numerical analysis","authors":"Phermphorn Buathong ,&nbsp;Pornkasem Jongpradist ,&nbsp;Pitthaya Jamsawang","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the performance of a lightweight clay-air foam embankment on soft Bangkok clay through a full-scale test and 3D numerical analysis using PLAXIS 3D. The embankment’s behavior was evaluated in terms of settlement, lateral movement, and earth pressure, with field data compared to numerical predictions. At an embankment height of 2.5 m, the maximum observed settlement was 83 mm, while computed values were overpredicted by 0.5–10%. The maximum lateral movement was 3.6 mm, with numerical predictions overestimating by 9%. Earth pressure measurements showed a peak of 25 kPa, slightly lower than the theoretical 33 kPa, with computed values overpredicted by 18%. A comparison with conventional embankments revealed significantly improved performance using lightweight materials. The traditional embankment exhibited a maximum settlement of 1089 mm, 12.6 times higher than the lightweight embankment. The lateral movement reached 116 mm for the conventional embankment, compared to 3.6 mm for the lightweight embankment. The lightweight embankment shows a maximum earth pressure of approximately 30 kPa, whereas the conventional embankment reaches around 80 kPa, indicating a 2.7 times reduction in stress for the lightweight embankment. Furthermore, the factor of safety was significantly higher for the lightweight embankment (7.28) than for the conventional one (1.13), demonstrating its superior stability. These results highlight the effectiveness of lightweight materials in reducing settlement, lateral movement, and earth pressure, offering a practical solution for improving embankment sscheility on soft soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 105793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259012302501864X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of a lightweight clay-air foam embankment on soft Bangkok clay through a full-scale test and 3D numerical analysis using PLAXIS 3D. The embankment’s behavior was evaluated in terms of settlement, lateral movement, and earth pressure, with field data compared to numerical predictions. At an embankment height of 2.5 m, the maximum observed settlement was 83 mm, while computed values were overpredicted by 0.5–10%. The maximum lateral movement was 3.6 mm, with numerical predictions overestimating by 9%. Earth pressure measurements showed a peak of 25 kPa, slightly lower than the theoretical 33 kPa, with computed values overpredicted by 18%. A comparison with conventional embankments revealed significantly improved performance using lightweight materials. The traditional embankment exhibited a maximum settlement of 1089 mm, 12.6 times higher than the lightweight embankment. The lateral movement reached 116 mm for the conventional embankment, compared to 3.6 mm for the lightweight embankment. The lightweight embankment shows a maximum earth pressure of approximately 30 kPa, whereas the conventional embankment reaches around 80 kPa, indicating a 2.7 times reduction in stress for the lightweight embankment. Furthermore, the factor of safety was significantly higher for the lightweight embankment (7.28) than for the conventional one (1.13), demonstrating its superior stability. These results highlight the effectiveness of lightweight materials in reducing settlement, lateral movement, and earth pressure, offering a practical solution for improving embankment sscheility on soft soils.
曼谷软土上轻质粘土-空气泡沫路基的性能评价:全尺寸试验和三维数值分析
本研究通过全尺寸试验和PLAXIS 3D三维数值分析,研究了轻质粘土-空气泡沫路基在软曼谷粘土上的性能。路堤的行为在沉降、横向移动和土压力方面进行了评估,并将现场数据与数值预测进行了比较。在路堤高度为2.5 m时,观测到的最大沉降为83 mm,而计算值高估了0.5-10%。最大横向移动为3.6 mm,数值预测高估了9%。土压力测量结果显示峰值为25 kPa,略低于理论值33 kPa,计算值高估了18%。与传统路堤的比较表明,使用轻质材料显著提高了性能。传统路堤的最大沉降量为1089 mm,是轻型路堤的12.6倍。常规路堤的横向位移达到116毫米,而轻型路堤的横向位移为3.6毫米。轻质路堤的最大土压力约为30 kPa,而传统路堤的最大土压力约为80 kPa,表明轻质路堤的应力降低了2.7倍。此外,轻型路堤的安全系数(7.28)明显高于常规路堤的安全系数(1.13),表明其具有更好的稳定性。这些结果突出了轻质材料在减少沉降、侧移和土压力方面的有效性,为改善软土路基的抗剪性提供了切实可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信