A review of lead exposure source attributional studies

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christopher Kinally , Richard Fuller , Bjorn Larsen , Howard Hu , Bruce Lanphear
{"title":"A review of lead exposure source attributional studies","authors":"Christopher Kinally ,&nbsp;Richard Fuller ,&nbsp;Bjorn Larsen ,&nbsp;Howard Hu ,&nbsp;Bruce Lanphear","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the global phase-out of leaded gasoline, lead poisoning is estimated to cause 5.5 million premature deaths and the loss of 765 million IQ points annually. However, the contributions of different lead exposure sources to blood lead levels (BLLs) are poorly understood. We conducted a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, examining 39 studies that attribute BLLs to specific sources of lead exposure, published since the year 2000 and with sample sizes &gt;<!--> <!-->100. The 39 studies were from 26 countries; 22 were from low- and middle-income countries, with an average sample size of 1003 participants. Twenty-three of the studies reported absolute BLL impacts (μg/L) from lead exposure sources, other studies reported odds ratios for elevated BLLs (&gt;<!--> <!-->50 or &gt; 100 μg/L). Averaged across the studies, the BLL impacts were 42.3 μg/L from living near industrial lead pollution hotspots, 31.4 μg/L from occupational and take-home exposure, 28.0 μg/L from deteriorated paint, 19.8 μg/L from traditional medicines and cosmetics, 19.3 μg/L from foodware (glazed ceramics and melamine plates), 17.3 μg/L from smoking, 15.4 μg/L from foods, and 12.9 μg/L from geophagy. Only one of the reviewed studies assessed the BLL impact of metal cookware, and did not find a significant relationship with BLLs. However, the statistical power of the attributional studies to detect relationships with BLLs was often limited. Future studies should investigate the ingestion routes from industrial pollution, the contamination of foods and spices, BLL impacts of lead-contaminated metal cookware, and traditional medicines administered to young children and infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"990 ","pages":"Article 179838"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725014792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the global phase-out of leaded gasoline, lead poisoning is estimated to cause 5.5 million premature deaths and the loss of 765 million IQ points annually. However, the contributions of different lead exposure sources to blood lead levels (BLLs) are poorly understood. We conducted a systematic literature review using the Scopus database, examining 39 studies that attribute BLLs to specific sources of lead exposure, published since the year 2000 and with sample sizes > 100. The 39 studies were from 26 countries; 22 were from low- and middle-income countries, with an average sample size of 1003 participants. Twenty-three of the studies reported absolute BLL impacts (μg/L) from lead exposure sources, other studies reported odds ratios for elevated BLLs (> 50 or > 100 μg/L). Averaged across the studies, the BLL impacts were 42.3 μg/L from living near industrial lead pollution hotspots, 31.4 μg/L from occupational and take-home exposure, 28.0 μg/L from deteriorated paint, 19.8 μg/L from traditional medicines and cosmetics, 19.3 μg/L from foodware (glazed ceramics and melamine plates), 17.3 μg/L from smoking, 15.4 μg/L from foods, and 12.9 μg/L from geophagy. Only one of the reviewed studies assessed the BLL impact of metal cookware, and did not find a significant relationship with BLLs. However, the statistical power of the attributional studies to detect relationships with BLLs was often limited. Future studies should investigate the ingestion routes from industrial pollution, the contamination of foods and spices, BLL impacts of lead-contaminated metal cookware, and traditional medicines administered to young children and infants.
铅暴露源归因研究综述
尽管全球逐步淘汰含铅汽油,但据估计,每年仍有550万人过早死亡,并损失7.65亿智商点。然而,不同的铅暴露源对血铅水平(bll)的影响尚不清楚。我们使用Scopus数据库进行了系统的文献综述,检查了自2000年以来发表的39项将bll归因于特定铅暴露源的研究,样本量为>;One hundred.。这39项研究来自26个国家;22个来自低收入和中等收入国家,平均样本量为1003人。23项研究报告了铅暴露源对BLL的绝对影响(μg/L),其他研究报告了BLL升高的优势比(>;50或>;100μg / L)。平均来看,居住在工业铅污染热点附近对铅的影响为42.3 μg/L,职业和家庭接触为31.4 μg/L,变质涂料为28.0 μg/L,传统药品和化妆品为19.8 μg/L,食品(釉面陶瓷和三聚氰胺板)为19.3 μg/L,吸烟为17.3 μg/L,食品为15.4 μg/L,食土为12.9 μg/L。只有一项研究评估了金属炊具对生物碱的影响,并没有发现与生物碱的显著关系。然而,归因研究的统计能力往往是有限的。未来的研究应调查工业污染、食品和香料污染、铅污染金属炊具对BLL的影响以及幼儿和婴儿使用的传统药物的摄入途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信