Exploring barriers and developing strategies for implementing smart supply chain management with Delphi method and ISM-MICMAC

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Briliana Kurrita Aini , Mu-Chen Chen
{"title":"Exploring barriers and developing strategies for implementing smart supply chain management with Delphi method and ISM-MICMAC","authors":"Briliana Kurrita Aini ,&nbsp;Mu-Chen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study attempts to explore the barriers associated with adopting smart supply chain management (SCM 4.0) within Indonesia's electronics industry. This study also constructs the hierarchical framework for these barriers and categorizes them into groups. While many previous studies have explored SCM 4.0, research on its barriers in Indonesia's electronics industry remains limited. This study fills this gap by exploring barriers in Indonesia's electronics industry and emphasizing the government's role in SCM 4.0, providing a detailed understanding of their impact on SCM 4.0 implementation in Indonesia's electronics industry. The findings offer valuable implications for academia by providing new insights about SCM 4.0 in Indonesia's electronics industry, for policymakers by highlighting the need for supportive regulations, and for industry stakeholders by identifying key barriers to effective SCM 4.0 implementation. The initial 21 barriers to SCM 4.0 implementation, derived from the previous study, are validated and ranked using the Delphi method. After the first round of Delphi survey, a barrier, lack of government incentive, is added, and the total of barriers included in the second round is 22 barriers. Based on the results of Delphi survey, 12 barriers are considered essential and further analyzed in the next step. Interpretive structural modeling - cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (ISM-MICMAC) is then utilized to build the hierarchical relationship among the barriers and group them based on their driving power and dependence power. Lack of government regulation and supports and lack of government incentives are the most fundamental barriers, and they are categorized as independent barriers. Based on the results, this study also proposes the SCM 4.0 implementation strategy for Indonesia's electronics industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101439"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempts to explore the barriers associated with adopting smart supply chain management (SCM 4.0) within Indonesia's electronics industry. This study also constructs the hierarchical framework for these barriers and categorizes them into groups. While many previous studies have explored SCM 4.0, research on its barriers in Indonesia's electronics industry remains limited. This study fills this gap by exploring barriers in Indonesia's electronics industry and emphasizing the government's role in SCM 4.0, providing a detailed understanding of their impact on SCM 4.0 implementation in Indonesia's electronics industry. The findings offer valuable implications for academia by providing new insights about SCM 4.0 in Indonesia's electronics industry, for policymakers by highlighting the need for supportive regulations, and for industry stakeholders by identifying key barriers to effective SCM 4.0 implementation. The initial 21 barriers to SCM 4.0 implementation, derived from the previous study, are validated and ranked using the Delphi method. After the first round of Delphi survey, a barrier, lack of government incentive, is added, and the total of barriers included in the second round is 22 barriers. Based on the results of Delphi survey, 12 barriers are considered essential and further analyzed in the next step. Interpretive structural modeling - cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (ISM-MICMAC) is then utilized to build the hierarchical relationship among the barriers and group them based on their driving power and dependence power. Lack of government regulation and supports and lack of government incentives are the most fundamental barriers, and they are categorized as independent barriers. Based on the results, this study also proposes the SCM 4.0 implementation strategy for Indonesia's electronics industry.
利用德尔菲法和ISM-MICMAC探讨智能供应链管理的障碍和发展策略
本研究试图探讨印尼电子行业采用智能供应链管理(SCM 4.0)的相关障碍。本研究还构建了这些障碍的层次框架,并将其分类。虽然许多先前的研究已经探索了SCM 4.0,但对其在印度尼西亚电子行业中的障碍的研究仍然有限。本研究通过探索印尼电子行业的障碍和强调政府在SCM 4.0中的作用来填补这一空白,详细了解它们对印尼电子行业实施SCM 4.0的影响。这些发现为学术界提供了关于印尼电子工业中SCM 4.0的新见解,为政策制定者提供了强调支持性法规的需求,为行业利益相关者提供了有价值的启示,通过确定有效实施SCM 4.0的主要障碍。从先前的研究中得出的SCM 4.0实施的最初21个障碍,使用德尔菲法进行验证和排名。在第一轮德尔菲调查后,增加了政府激励不足这一障碍,第二轮调查的障碍总数为22个。根据德尔菲调查的结果,认为12个障碍是必要的,并在下一步进一步分析。然后利用解释性结构建模-交叉影响矩阵乘法分类(ISM-MICMAC),建立障碍之间的层次关系,并根据障碍的驱动能力和依赖能力对障碍进行分组。缺乏政府的监管和支持,缺乏政府的激励是最根本的障碍,它们被归类为独立的障碍。在此基础上,本研究还提出了印尼电子行业的SCM 4.0实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信