Unleashing American Energy? Uncertainties in energy transition developments under a new Trump administration

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Raphael Deberdt , Angeline Letourneau , Philippe Le Billon
{"title":"Unleashing American Energy? Uncertainties in energy transition developments under a new Trump administration","authors":"Raphael Deberdt ,&nbsp;Angeline Letourneau ,&nbsp;Philippe Le Billon","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The United States (U.S.) needs critical minerals if it wants to compete with China in low-carbon and military technologies. The country is, however, caught in a dual dynamic. It needs increased critical minerals supplies but also engages in aggressive policies aimed at dismantling federal support for low-carbon products as well as establishing foreign trade barriers. This article is informed by political ecology and political economy and addresses the perceptions of economic actors involved in the critical minerals sector during the first 100 days of Donald Trump's second presidency. The U.S. efforts to develop critical minerals have relied on a flurry of administrative and legal instruments. Despite an increased production of official policies and laws in the past 15 years, we find that the 2025 political transition spurred uncertainties. Though the domestic and international landscape remains unclear, a majority of actors within the U.S. critical minerals sector maintains a positive outlook on the impacts of the Trump presidency on their industry. They underline that the new administration is likely to streamline permitting processes and consolidate Federal financial support after the appointment of pro-business and pro-energy department heads. So far, however, the neo‐illiberal turn initiated under the Biden administration and turbocharged by the Trump administration under a blunt agenda alienating many communities and traditional foreign allies has failed to produce the expected results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104169"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) needs critical minerals if it wants to compete with China in low-carbon and military technologies. The country is, however, caught in a dual dynamic. It needs increased critical minerals supplies but also engages in aggressive policies aimed at dismantling federal support for low-carbon products as well as establishing foreign trade barriers. This article is informed by political ecology and political economy and addresses the perceptions of economic actors involved in the critical minerals sector during the first 100 days of Donald Trump's second presidency. The U.S. efforts to develop critical minerals have relied on a flurry of administrative and legal instruments. Despite an increased production of official policies and laws in the past 15 years, we find that the 2025 political transition spurred uncertainties. Though the domestic and international landscape remains unclear, a majority of actors within the U.S. critical minerals sector maintains a positive outlook on the impacts of the Trump presidency on their industry. They underline that the new administration is likely to streamline permitting processes and consolidate Federal financial support after the appointment of pro-business and pro-energy department heads. So far, however, the neo‐illiberal turn initiated under the Biden administration and turbocharged by the Trump administration under a blunt agenda alienating many communities and traditional foreign allies has failed to produce the expected results.
释放美国能源?特朗普新政府下能源转型发展的不确定性
如果美国想在低碳和军事技术领域与中国竞争,就需要关键的矿产资源。然而,这个国家陷入了双重动态。它需要增加关键矿产的供应,但也采取激进的政策,旨在取消联邦政府对低碳产品的支持,并建立对外贸易壁垒。本文以政治生态学和政治经济学为依据,探讨了在唐纳德·特朗普第二任总统任期的前100天里,涉及关键矿产部门的经济行为者的看法。美国开发关键矿产的努力依赖于一系列行政和法律工具。尽管在过去15年中官方政策和法律的制定有所增加,但我们发现2025年的政治转型引发了不确定性。尽管国内外形势仍不明朗,但美国关键矿产行业的大多数参与者仍对特朗普总统任期对其行业的影响持积极态度。他们强调,在任命亲商业和亲能源的部门负责人后,新政府可能会简化审批程序,并巩固联邦财政支持。然而,到目前为止,拜登政府发起的新自由主义转向,以及特朗普政府在疏远许多社区和传统外国盟友的直言不讳议程下的加速,未能产生预期的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信