Implementing energy sharing in energy communities: A comparative legal analysis of Austria and Flanders

IF 3.8 3区经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS

Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2025.101993

Ting Chen , Alina Anapyanova , Frederik Vandenriessche , Hermann de Meer

{"title":"Implementing energy sharing in energy communities: A comparative legal analysis of Austria and Flanders","authors":"Ting Chen , Alina Anapyanova , Frederik Vandenriessche , Hermann de Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>EU law empowers Citizen Energy Communities (CECs) and Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) to arrange energy sharing. Transposing the relevant EU law requires more detailed rules to define energy sharing, interpret ownership requirements, set applicable network tariffs, and regulate the charges and conditions imposed by other stakeholders. Austria and Flanders (Belgium) are pioneers in developing legal frameworks for energy communities. This article compares the implementation of energy sharing, highlighting differences in defining the obligations of energy communities, the alignment of interests between community members and suppliers, the application of network tariffs, and the adequacy of regulations regarding supplier-imposed conditions and charges. The comparative analysis reveals that Austria and Flanders face common challenges in ensuring that community members are protected from unjustified charges or conditions imposed by suppliers, as well as in facilitating multiple energy sharing agreements. Austria needs to address the technical and legal challenges of grid tariff reductions, close consumer protection gaps in energy sharing, and improve legal certainty and transparency. The Austria-Flanders comparison offers insights and policy recommendations for both jurisdictions and other EU Member States.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101993"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

EU law empowers Citizen Energy Communities (CECs) and Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) to arrange energy sharing. Transposing the relevant EU law requires more detailed rules to define energy sharing, interpret ownership requirements, set applicable network tariffs, and regulate the charges and conditions imposed by other stakeholders. Austria and Flanders (Belgium) are pioneers in developing legal frameworks for energy communities. This article compares the implementation of energy sharing, highlighting differences in defining the obligations of energy communities, the alignment of interests between community members and suppliers, the application of network tariffs, and the adequacy of regulations regarding supplier-imposed conditions and charges. The comparative analysis reveals that Austria and Flanders face common challenges in ensuring that community members are protected from unjustified charges or conditions imposed by suppliers, as well as in facilitating multiple energy sharing agreements. Austria needs to address the technical and legal challenges of grid tariff reductions, close consumer protection gaps in energy sharing, and improve legal certainty and transparency. The Austria-Flanders comparison offers insights and policy recommendations for both jurisdictions and other EU Member States.

查看原文本刊更多论文

能源社区实施能源共享：奥地利和佛兰德斯的比较法律分析

欧盟法律授权公民能源社区（CECs）和可再生能源社区（RECs）安排能源共享。转换相关的欧盟法律需要更详细的规则来定义能源共享，解释所有权要求，设定适用的网络关税，并规范其他利益相关者施加的收费和条件。奥地利和佛兰德斯（比利时）是为能源社区制定法律框架的先驱。本文比较了能源共享的实施，强调了在定义能源社区义务、社区成员和供应商之间的利益一致性、网络关税的应用以及供应商施加的条件和收费方面的法规的充分性方面的差异。比较分析表明，奥地利和佛兰德斯在确保社区成员免受供应商不合理收费或强加条件的影响以及促进多种能源共享协议方面面临共同挑战。奥地利需要解决电网关税削减的技术和法律挑战，缩小能源共享中消费者保护的差距，并提高法律的确定性和透明度。奥地利和法兰德斯的比较为两个司法管辖区和其他欧盟成员国提供了见解和政策建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.