Constructing cleaner food service production design: Quality measurement and priority paradoxes in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia

Tutur Wicaksono , Marhadi Marhadi , Glisina Dwinoor Rembulan , Md. Nekmahmud
{"title":"Constructing cleaner food service production design: Quality measurement and priority paradoxes in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia","authors":"Tutur Wicaksono ,&nbsp;Marhadi Marhadi ,&nbsp;Glisina Dwinoor Rembulan ,&nbsp;Md. Nekmahmud","doi":"10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The food service industry remains a major contributor to global food waste and food insecurity, a challenge that is increasingly unacceptable amid rising consumer awareness of environmental issues. This study proposes a cleaner production prioritization model using a modified Quality Function Deployment approach, supported by two structured surveys involving customers and industry practitioners. The findings reveal a significant perception gap. Customers assign the highest importance to good operational practices (CIMP = 4.29), employee training and awareness (CIMP = 4.26), and waste management (CIMP = 3.98), yet report low satisfaction in these areas. In contrast, practitioners prioritize good operational practices (IPI = 4.45), technology and equipment modification (IPI = 4.39), and employee training and awareness (IPI = 4.32), while rating waste management as least valuable for revenue growth (PRC = 1.0). To determine strategic focus, cleaner production attribute absolute scores (CPAS) were calculated and normalized into Cleaner Production Relative Scores (CPRS), identifying good operational practices (CPAS = 9.40, CPRS = 19.4 %), employee training and awareness (CPAS = 8.27, CPRS = 17.1 %), and technology and equipment modification (CPAS = 6.90, CPRS = 14.2 %) as top priorities. Integrated cleaner production training (TAA = 303, TAR = 12.5 %) and circular material utilization (TAA = 296, TAR = 12.2 %) were identified as the most impactful technical actions to address the identified gaps. These insights offer actionable guidance for aligning food service practices with customer expectations to enhance sustainability and competitive advantage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100250,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772801325000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The food service industry remains a major contributor to global food waste and food insecurity, a challenge that is increasingly unacceptable amid rising consumer awareness of environmental issues. This study proposes a cleaner production prioritization model using a modified Quality Function Deployment approach, supported by two structured surveys involving customers and industry practitioners. The findings reveal a significant perception gap. Customers assign the highest importance to good operational practices (CIMP = 4.29), employee training and awareness (CIMP = 4.26), and waste management (CIMP = 3.98), yet report low satisfaction in these areas. In contrast, practitioners prioritize good operational practices (IPI = 4.45), technology and equipment modification (IPI = 4.39), and employee training and awareness (IPI = 4.32), while rating waste management as least valuable for revenue growth (PRC = 1.0). To determine strategic focus, cleaner production attribute absolute scores (CPAS) were calculated and normalized into Cleaner Production Relative Scores (CPRS), identifying good operational practices (CPAS = 9.40, CPRS = 19.4 %), employee training and awareness (CPAS = 8.27, CPRS = 17.1 %), and technology and equipment modification (CPAS = 6.90, CPRS = 14.2 %) as top priorities. Integrated cleaner production training (TAA = 303, TAR = 12.5 %) and circular material utilization (TAA = 296, TAR = 12.2 %) were identified as the most impactful technical actions to address the identified gaps. These insights offer actionable guidance for aligning food service practices with customer expectations to enhance sustainability and competitive advantage.
构建更清洁的食品服务生产设计:印度尼西亚大雅加达的质量测量和优先级悖论
食品服务业仍然是造成全球粮食浪费和粮食不安全的一个主要因素,随着消费者对环境问题的认识不断提高,这一挑战越来越令人无法接受。本研究提出了一个使用改进的质量功能部署方法的清洁生产优先级模型,并通过涉及客户和行业从业者的两次结构化调查提供支持。研究结果揭示了一个显著的认知差距。客户对良好的操作规范(CIMP = 4.29)、员工培训和意识(CIMP = 4.26)和废物管理(CIMP = 3.98)给予了最高的重视,但在这些领域的满意度较低。相比之下,从业者优先考虑良好的操作规范(IPI = 4.45)、技术和设备改造(IPI = 4.39)以及员工培训和意识(IPI = 4.32),而将废物管理评为对收入增长最没有价值的(PRC = 1.0)。为确定战略重点,计算清洁生产属性绝对得分(CPAS)并将其归一化为清洁生产相对得分(CPRS),确定良好操作规范(CPAS = 9.40, CPRS = 19.4%)、员工培训和意识(CPAS = 8.27, CPRS = 17.1%)以及技术和设备改造(CPAS = 6.90, CPRS = 14.2%)为首要重点。综合清洁生产培训(TAA = 303, TAR = 12.5%)和循环材料利用(TAA = 296, TAR = 12.2%)被确定为解决已确定差距的最有效技术行动。这些见解为使食品服务实践与客户期望保持一致提供了可操作的指导,以增强可持续性和竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信