Circularity potentials, influential factors, modeling approach and policy interventions of circular supply chain for electric vehicles

IF 6.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Karsi Widiawati , Bertha Maya Sopha , Benny Tjahjono , Naly Rakoto
{"title":"Circularity potentials, influential factors, modeling approach and policy interventions of circular supply chain for electric vehicles","authors":"Karsi Widiawati ,&nbsp;Bertha Maya Sopha ,&nbsp;Benny Tjahjono ,&nbsp;Naly Rakoto","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) provide a primary alternative for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. Nonetheless, their extensive use poses concerns, including a rise in throwaway batteries, which, if inadequately managed, may result in heightened human toxicity. Therefore, the establishment of a circular supply chain (CSC) for EVs is crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability. This study seeks to investigate circularity potentials of end of life (EoL) EVs, influential factors, modeling approaches, and policy interventions that promote the implementation of a CSC for EVs based on a systematic review of empirical-based literature following the PRISMA framework. The findings highlight that, under an optimized waste hierarchy, approximately 55.1–59.5 % of EV components can be reused, 24.4−31.8 % repurposed, 55.1−59.5 % remanufactured, and 95.6−96.0 % recycled, leaving about 23.5–24.7 % of components destined for landfills. Five factors pertaining to regulations, economics, environment, technology and infrastructure, ecosystem were identified to be influential for the CSC implementation for EVs. These factors are modeled using either optimization, simulation, or hybrid approach, depending on the modeling objective and settings, in order to comprehend the CSC system, support decision-making and enhance resource recovery strategies. Policy interventions primarily focused on collection and transportation, technology and infrastructure, and economic aspects, have recently been expanded to encompass social interventions, design standardization, and stakeholder collaboration. Given the potential circularity of EV components, the multifaceted factors involving various stakeholders should be addressed in designing and implementing CSC system for a more resource-efficient future of EVs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101013"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825001363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) provide a primary alternative for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. Nonetheless, their extensive use poses concerns, including a rise in throwaway batteries, which, if inadequately managed, may result in heightened human toxicity. Therefore, the establishment of a circular supply chain (CSC) for EVs is crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability. This study seeks to investigate circularity potentials of end of life (EoL) EVs, influential factors, modeling approaches, and policy interventions that promote the implementation of a CSC for EVs based on a systematic review of empirical-based literature following the PRISMA framework. The findings highlight that, under an optimized waste hierarchy, approximately 55.1–59.5 % of EV components can be reused, 24.4−31.8 % repurposed, 55.1−59.5 % remanufactured, and 95.6−96.0 % recycled, leaving about 23.5–24.7 % of components destined for landfills. Five factors pertaining to regulations, economics, environment, technology and infrastructure, ecosystem were identified to be influential for the CSC implementation for EVs. These factors are modeled using either optimization, simulation, or hybrid approach, depending on the modeling objective and settings, in order to comprehend the CSC system, support decision-making and enhance resource recovery strategies. Policy interventions primarily focused on collection and transportation, technology and infrastructure, and economic aspects, have recently been expanded to encompass social interventions, design standardization, and stakeholder collaboration. Given the potential circularity of EV components, the multifaceted factors involving various stakeholders should be addressed in designing and implementing CSC system for a more resource-efficient future of EVs.
电动汽车循环供应链的潜力、影响因素、建模方法及政策干预
电动汽车(ev)为减少交通运输部门的温室气体排放提供了主要的替代方案。然而,它们的广泛使用引起了人们的关注,包括一次性电池的增加,如果管理不善,可能会导致人体毒性增加。因此,建立电动汽车循环供应链(CSC)对于确保长期可持续性至关重要。本研究旨在通过对基于经验的文献的系统综述,在PRISMA框架下,探讨电动汽车生命终结(EoL)的循环潜力、影响因素、建模方法以及促进电动汽车生命终结(CSC)实施的政策干预。研究结果表明,在优化的废物层次结构下,约55.1 - 59.5%的电动汽车组件可重复使用,24.4 - 31.8%可重新利用,55.1% - 59.5%可再制造,95.6% - 96.0%可回收,其余约23.5 - 24.7%的组件将被填埋。从法规、经济、环境、技术和基础设施、生态系统五个方面确定了影响电动汽车CSC实施的因素。根据建模目标和设置,使用优化、模拟或混合方法对这些因素进行建模,以便理解CSC系统,支持决策并增强资源恢复策略。政策干预主要集中在收集和运输、技术和基础设施以及经济方面,最近已经扩展到包括社会干预、设计标准化和利益相关者合作。考虑到电动汽车零部件的潜在循环性,在设计和实施CSC系统时,应解决涉及各利益相关者的多方面因素,以实现更节约资源的电动汽车未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信