How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products

Marco Medici , Massimiliano Calvia , Nicolas Greggio , Alessandro Buscaroli , Diego Marazza , Maurizio Canavari
{"title":"How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products","authors":"Marco Medici ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Calvia ,&nbsp;Nicolas Greggio ,&nbsp;Alessandro Buscaroli ,&nbsp;Diego Marazza ,&nbsp;Maurizio Canavari","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1–300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1 % of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified -<em>The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic,</em> and <em>The Engaged</em>-highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as <em>The Engaged</em>, a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study's insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911925000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1–300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1 % of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified -The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic, and The Engaged-highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as The Engaged, a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study's insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers.
农民如何评价有机肥料的价值?传统产品与创新产品的探索性研究
目前,采用有机肥料(如生物炭和由各种有机废物制成的生物炭-堆肥混合物)取代矿物肥料的农业创新趋势最近被认为是在实施循环经济的同时恢复和改善土壤肥力并减轻环境影响的重要创新。设计了一项调查,以了解社会经济特征和农民对使用有机肥料的态度。使用探索性主成分分析(PCA)对176名农民的态度数据进行分析,以确定与他们接受度相关的成分。随后,这些成分和社会经济数据被用来描述与新型有机肥料(生物炭-堆肥混合物)的支付意愿(WTP)相匹配的农民群体。WTP使用二分选择或有估值在每吨1-300欧元的范围内进行品尝。63.1%的农民表示BCmix的WTP呈阳性,平均首选施用量超过11吨/公顷。我们确定了五个对有机肥料持不同态度和欣赏水平的主要农民群体——中立者、未准备者、反对者、怀疑论者和参与者——突出了对有机肥料的一系列态度和欣赏水平。有趣的是,对有机肥料持中立态度的集群比积极致力于可持续发展的集群(如The Engaged)表现出明显更高的WTP,这一发现与之前的研究形成鲜明对比,即致力于环保的农民通常表现出更大的采用意愿。该研究的见解支持有针对性的市场细分,并为政策和传播战略提供信息,以促进有机肥料的早期采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信