Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Zhuying Dai, Saman Haratian, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens and Vishal Verma*, 
{"title":"Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter","authors":"P. S. Ganesh Subramanian,&nbsp;Zhuying Dai,&nbsp;Saman Haratian,&nbsp;Mohammad Heidarinejad,&nbsp;Brent Stephens and Vishal Verma*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OP<sub>DTT</sub>), glutathione consumption (OP<sub>GSH</sub>), and hydroxyl radical generation (OP<sub>OH</sub>). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OP<sup><i>m</i></sup> of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75–1.25×) or exceeded (1–6×) that of typical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OP<sub>DTT</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> and OP<sub>OH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> while OP<sub>GSH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m<sup>3</sup>, air change rate = 0.45 h<sup>–1</sup>, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> (8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 25","pages":"12797–12811"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OPDTT), glutathione consumption (OPGSH), and hydroxyl radical generation (OPOH). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OPm of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75–1.25×) or exceeded (1–6×) that of typical ambient PM2.5. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OPDTTm and OPOHm while OPGSHm was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m3, air change rate = 0.45 h–1, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM2.5 (8 μg/m3) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.

Abstract Image

常见室内颗粒物来源的氧化电位。
尽管人们近90%的时间都在室内度过,但室内排放的源特异性氧化电位(OP)跨越多种颗粒产生机制在很大程度上是未知的。在这里,我们通过三种不同的测定方法,即二硫苏糖醇消耗(OPDTT)、谷胱甘肽消耗(OPGSH)和羟基自由基生成(OPOH),量化了来自常用室内源的PM的OP。几种来源(蜡烛、熏香、香烟、使用自来水的加湿器、烤面包机和空气炸锅)的内在(质量标准化)OPm与典型环境PM2.5相当(0.75-1.25倍)或超过(1-6倍)。在有风的情况下,蜡烛排放的OPDTTm和OPOHm最高,而香烟排放的OPGSHm最高。元素碳决定了不完全燃烧源排放的PM的OP,而对于非燃烧源(水蒸发和基于加热的),金属是重要的驱动因素。在一个假设的公寓(容积= 100立方米,换气率= 0.45 h-1,渗透系数= 0.6)中进行的探索性暴露评估显示,某些来源(如熏香、香烟、烤面包机和空气炸锅)可能导致居住者在不到1小时的室内操作中暴露于更高的OP,而不是吸入典型的美国环境PM2.5 (8 μg/m3)一整天。总的来说,这些结果表明室内排放的重要性,强调需要进行更全面的健康影响评估,以协助制定旨在减少室内PM暴露的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信