P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Zhuying Dai, Saman Haratian, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens and Vishal Verma*,
{"title":"Oxidative Potential from Common Indoor Sources of Particulate Matter","authors":"P. S. Ganesh Subramanian, Zhuying Dai, Saman Haratian, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens and Vishal Verma*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OP<sub>DTT</sub>), glutathione consumption (OP<sub>GSH</sub>), and hydroxyl radical generation (OP<sub>OH</sub>). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OP<sup><i>m</i></sup> of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75–1.25×) or exceeded (1–6×) that of typical ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OP<sub>DTT</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> and OP<sub>OH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> while OP<sub>GSH</sub><sup><i>m</i></sup> was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m<sup>3</sup>, air change rate = 0.45 h<sup>–1</sup>, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> (8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 25","pages":"12797–12811"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although people spend nearly 90% of their time indoors, the source-specific oxidative potential (OP) from indoor emissions spanning multiple particle generation mechanisms is largely unknown. Here, we quantify the OP of the PM originating from commonly used indoor sources via three different assays, i.e., dithiothreitol consumption (OPDTT), glutathione consumption (OPGSH), and hydroxyl radical generation (OPOH). The intrinsic (mass-normalized) OPm of several sources (candles, incense, cigarettes, humidifiers using tap water, toasters, and air fryers) were comparable (0.75–1.25×) or exceeded (1–6×) that of typical ambient PM2.5. Emissions from candles in the presence of a wind-draft had the highest OPDTTm and OPOHm while OPGSHm was highest for cigarette emissions. Elemental carbon determined the OP of PM emitted from sources undergoing incomplete combustion, whereas, for noncombustion sources (water evaporation and heating-based), metals were the important drivers. An exploratory exposure assessment in a hypothetical apartment (volume = 100 m3, air change rate = 0.45 h–1, and penetration coefficient = 0.6) revealed that certain sources (e.g., incense, cigarettes, toasters, and air-fryers) could result in occupants being exposed to higher OP in less than 1 h of indoor operation than that resulting from inhaling typical U.S. ambient PM2.5 (8 μg/m3) over an entire day. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of indoor emissions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive health impact assessments to assist in the development of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating indoor PM exposure.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.