Predicting clinical and functional trajectories in individuals with first-episode psychosis by baseline deviations in grey matter volume.

Manuel Muñoz-Caracuel,Claudio Alemán-Morillo,Natalia García-San-Martín,Nathalia Garrido-Torres,María Alemany-Navarro,Richard A I Bethlehem,Lena Dorfschmidt,Jakob Seidlitz,Rosa Ayesa-Arriola,Javier Vázquez-Bourgon,Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla,,Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,Rafael Romero-García
{"title":"Predicting clinical and functional trajectories in individuals with first-episode psychosis by baseline deviations in grey matter volume.","authors":"Manuel Muñoz-Caracuel,Claudio Alemán-Morillo,Natalia García-San-Martín,Nathalia Garrido-Torres,María Alemany-Navarro,Richard A I Bethlehem,Lena Dorfschmidt,Jakob Seidlitz,Rosa Ayesa-Arriola,Javier Vázquez-Bourgon,Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla,,Benedicto Crespo-Facorro,Rafael Romero-García","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPredicting long-term outcome trajectories in psychosis remains a crucial and challenging goal in clinical practice. The identification of reliable neuroimaging markers has often been hindered by the clinical and biological heterogeneity of psychotic disorders and the limitations of traditional case-control methodologies, which often mask individual variability. Recently, normative brain charts derived from extensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data-sets covering the human lifespan have emerged as a promising biologically driven solution, offering a more individualised approach.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo examine how deviations from normative cortical and subcortical grey matter volume (GMV) at first-episode psychosis (FEP) onset relate to symptom and functional trajectories.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nWe leveraged the largest available brain normative model (N > 100 000) to explore normative deviations in a sample of over 240 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who underwent MRI scans at the onset of FEP and received clinical follow-up at 1, 3 and 10 years.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOur findings reveal that deviations in regional normative GMV at FEP onset are significantly linked to overall long-term clinical trajectories, modulating the effect of time on both symptom and functional outcome. Specifically, negative deviations in the left superior temporal gyrus and Broca’s area at FEP onset were notably associated with a more severe progression of positive and negative symptoms, as well as with functioning trajectories over time.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese results underscore the potential of brain developmental normative approaches for the early prediction of disorder progression, and provide valuable insights for the development of preventive and personalised therapeutic strategies.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Predicting long-term outcome trajectories in psychosis remains a crucial and challenging goal in clinical practice. The identification of reliable neuroimaging markers has often been hindered by the clinical and biological heterogeneity of psychotic disorders and the limitations of traditional case-control methodologies, which often mask individual variability. Recently, normative brain charts derived from extensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data-sets covering the human lifespan have emerged as a promising biologically driven solution, offering a more individualised approach. AIMS To examine how deviations from normative cortical and subcortical grey matter volume (GMV) at first-episode psychosis (FEP) onset relate to symptom and functional trajectories. METHOD We leveraged the largest available brain normative model (N > 100 000) to explore normative deviations in a sample of over 240 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders who underwent MRI scans at the onset of FEP and received clinical follow-up at 1, 3 and 10 years. RESULTS Our findings reveal that deviations in regional normative GMV at FEP onset are significantly linked to overall long-term clinical trajectories, modulating the effect of time on both symptom and functional outcome. Specifically, negative deviations in the left superior temporal gyrus and Broca’s area at FEP onset were notably associated with a more severe progression of positive and negative symptoms, as well as with functioning trajectories over time. CONCLUSIONS These results underscore the potential of brain developmental normative approaches for the early prediction of disorder progression, and provide valuable insights for the development of preventive and personalised therapeutic strategies.
通过灰质体积基线偏差预测首发精神病患者的临床和功能轨迹。
在临床实践中,预测精神病的长期预后轨迹仍然是一个至关重要且具有挑战性的目标。由于精神疾病的临床和生物学异质性,以及传统病例对照方法的局限性,往往掩盖了个体的可变性,因此,确定可靠的神经影像学标志物常常受到阻碍。最近,从涵盖人类寿命的广泛磁共振成像(MRI)数据集衍生的规范脑图已成为一种有前途的生物学驱动解决方案,提供了更个性化的方法。目的研究首发精神病(FEP)发病时皮层和皮层下灰质体积(GMV)偏离标准与症状和功能轨迹的关系。方法:我们利用最大的可用脑规范模型(N bbb10万)来探索240多名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的规范偏差,这些患者在FEP发病时接受MRI扫描,并在1年、3年和10年接受临床随访。结果我们的研究结果表明,FEP发病时区域规范GMV的偏差与总体长期临床轨迹显著相关,调节了时间对症状和功能结局的影响。具体而言,FEP发病时左侧颞上回和布洛卡区出现的负性偏差与阳性和阴性症状的更严重进展以及随时间的功能轨迹显著相关。结论这些结果强调了大脑发育规范方法在早期预测疾病进展方面的潜力,并为制定预防和个性化治疗策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信