Artificial intelligence for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis in Australia: A Novel Qualitative Interview Study.

IF 2.4
Angelica Ly, Sarita Herse, Mary-Anne Williams, Fiona Stapleton
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis in Australia: A Novel Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Angelica Ly, Sarita Herse, Mary-Anne Williams, Fiona Stapleton","doi":"10.1111/opo.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) diagnosis abound but are not yet widely implemented. AI implementation is complex, requiring the involvement of multiple, diverse stakeholders including technology developers, clinicians, patients, health networks, public hospitals, private providers and payers. There is a pressing need to investigate how AI might be adopted to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this first study of its kind was to use the AI translation extended version of the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability of healthcare technologies framework to explore stakeholder experiences, attitudes, enablers, barriers and possible futures of digital diagnosis using AI for AMD and eyecare in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured, online interviews were conducted with 37 stakeholders (12 clinicians, 10 healthcare leaders, 8 patients and 7 developers) from September 2022 to March 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using directed and summative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technological features influencing implementation were most frequently discussed, followed by the context or wider system, value proposition, adopters, organisations, the condition and finally embedding the adaptation. Patients preferred to focus on the condition, while healthcare leaders elaborated on organisation factors. Overall, stakeholders supported a portable, device-independent clinical decision support tool that could be integrated with existing diagnostic equipment and patient management systems. Opportunities for AI to drive new models of healthcare, patient education and outreach, and the importance of maintaining equity across population groups were consistently emphasised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first investigation to report numerous, interacting perspectives on the adoption of digital diagnosis for AMD in Australia, incorporating an intentionally diverse stakeholder group and the patient voice. It provides a series of practical considerations for the implementation of AI and digital diagnosis into existing care for people with AMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) diagnosis abound but are not yet widely implemented. AI implementation is complex, requiring the involvement of multiple, diverse stakeholders including technology developers, clinicians, patients, health networks, public hospitals, private providers and payers. There is a pressing need to investigate how AI might be adopted to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this first study of its kind was to use the AI translation extended version of the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability of healthcare technologies framework to explore stakeholder experiences, attitudes, enablers, barriers and possible futures of digital diagnosis using AI for AMD and eyecare in Australia.

Methods: Semi-structured, online interviews were conducted with 37 stakeholders (12 clinicians, 10 healthcare leaders, 8 patients and 7 developers) from September 2022 to March 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using directed and summative content analysis.

Results: Technological features influencing implementation were most frequently discussed, followed by the context or wider system, value proposition, adopters, organisations, the condition and finally embedding the adaptation. Patients preferred to focus on the condition, while healthcare leaders elaborated on organisation factors. Overall, stakeholders supported a portable, device-independent clinical decision support tool that could be integrated with existing diagnostic equipment and patient management systems. Opportunities for AI to drive new models of healthcare, patient education and outreach, and the importance of maintaining equity across population groups were consistently emphasised.

Conclusions: This is the first investigation to report numerous, interacting perspectives on the adoption of digital diagnosis for AMD in Australia, incorporating an intentionally diverse stakeholder group and the patient voice. It provides a series of practical considerations for the implementation of AI and digital diagnosis into existing care for people with AMD.

人工智能在澳大利亚的年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断:一项新的定性访谈研究。
人工智能(AI)系统用于年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的诊断,但尚未广泛实施。人工智能的实施是复杂的,需要多个不同利益攸关方的参与,包括技术开发人员、临床医生、患者、卫生网络、公立医院、私营提供者和付款人。迫切需要研究如何采用人工智能来改善患者的治疗效果。这类研究的第一项目的是使用医疗技术框架的不采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性的人工智能翻译扩展版本,探索澳大利亚使用人工智能进行AMD和眼科护理的数字诊断的利益相关者经验、态度、推动因素、障碍和可能的未来。方法:从2022年9月至2023年3月,对37名利益相关者(12名临床医生、10名医疗保健领导者、8名患者和7名开发人员)进行了半结构化的在线访谈。访谈录音,转录和分析使用定向和总结性内容分析。结果:最常讨论的是影响实施的技术特征,其次是环境或更广泛的系统、价值主张、采用者、组织、条件,最后是嵌入适应。患者更倾向于关注病情,而医疗保健领导者则详细阐述了组织因素。总体而言,利益相关者支持可与现有诊断设备和患者管理系统集成的便携式、设备独立的临床决策支持工具。与会者一直强调人工智能推动医疗保健、患者教育和外展新模式的机会,以及保持各人口群体公平的重要性。结论:这是第一个报告澳大利亚AMD采用数字诊断的众多相互作用观点的调查,纳入了有意多样化的利益相关者群体和患者的声音。它为将人工智能和数字诊断实施到AMD患者的现有护理中提供了一系列实际考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信