{"title":"Assessment of the drowning index in diagnosing freshwater drowning: A comparative study","authors":"Nirmal Nagar MD, Binaya Kumar Bastia MD, Yatiraj Singi MD, Dipen Dabhi MD, Kriti Nagar","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drowning is a diagnosis of exclusion, as no finding is pathognomonic to drowning, making it a challenging task during autopsy. The drowning index (DI) is the ratio of the combined weights of both lungs and pleural effusion to the weight of the spleen. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare center in Northern India, including 75 cases of freshwater drowning, 64 cases of sudden cardiac death, and 40 cases of hanging deaths. We measured DI parameters such as the weights of both lungs, pleural effusion, and spleen, and the DI was calculated and compared among the groups. We also calculated the cut-off DI value using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We observed that in drowning cases, the value of DI, combined weight of both lungs, and pleural effusion is significantly higher, whereas the weight of the spleen is lower when compared with cardiac and hanging deaths. However, lung weight alone is not suggestive of drowning. A DI value of more than 9.7 is highly suggestive of freshwater drowning death, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 70.2% within a postmortem interval (PMI) of up to 2 weeks. The DI value is higher in males compared with females, but the difference is not statistically significant among the drowning group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 5","pages":"1844-1852"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drowning is a diagnosis of exclusion, as no finding is pathognomonic to drowning, making it a challenging task during autopsy. The drowning index (DI) is the ratio of the combined weights of both lungs and pleural effusion to the weight of the spleen. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare center in Northern India, including 75 cases of freshwater drowning, 64 cases of sudden cardiac death, and 40 cases of hanging deaths. We measured DI parameters such as the weights of both lungs, pleural effusion, and spleen, and the DI was calculated and compared among the groups. We also calculated the cut-off DI value using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We observed that in drowning cases, the value of DI, combined weight of both lungs, and pleural effusion is significantly higher, whereas the weight of the spleen is lower when compared with cardiac and hanging deaths. However, lung weight alone is not suggestive of drowning. A DI value of more than 9.7 is highly suggestive of freshwater drowning death, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 70.2% within a postmortem interval (PMI) of up to 2 weeks. The DI value is higher in males compared with females, but the difference is not statistically significant among the drowning group.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.