Near-miss Event in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Because of a Random Outlier of Target Volume.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Savino Cilla, Carmela Romano, Gabriella Macchia, Donato Pezzulla, Marica Ferro, Pietro Viola, Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Alessio G Morganti, Francesco Deodato
{"title":"Near-miss Event in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Because of a Random Outlier of Target Volume.","authors":"Savino Cilla, Carmela Romano, Gabriella Macchia, Donato Pezzulla, Marica Ferro, Pietro Viola, Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Alessio G Morganti, Francesco Deodato","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate tumor and organ-at-risk contouring is a critical step in radiation therapy. Contouring procedures, both manual and automated, are prone to errors and to a large degree of interobserver and intraobserver variability. Radiation oncologists and/or medical physicists have to perform independent reviews of all contours for each patient before using them for treatment planning, which is a time-consuming, labor-intensive, and still not error-free process. We presented the tracing of a subtle near-miss event because of the presence of a random outlier in the contours of a lung tumor, very far from the actual gross tumor volume. The treatment plan was performed with an automated treatment engine using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique. Despite the implementation and adoption of systematic procedures of quality assurance in our clinical routine, the error crossed the barriers of peer review and was identified subsequently only in the step of pretreatment dosimetric verification. The error was corrected, and the patient was replanned before treatment initiation. In this case study, we showed that the random creation of false-positive target outliers may have a detrimental impact on patient dose when automated planning is performed. This risk is not negligible, and all strategies for improving the robustness of target segmentation should be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate tumor and organ-at-risk contouring is a critical step in radiation therapy. Contouring procedures, both manual and automated, are prone to errors and to a large degree of interobserver and intraobserver variability. Radiation oncologists and/or medical physicists have to perform independent reviews of all contours for each patient before using them for treatment planning, which is a time-consuming, labor-intensive, and still not error-free process. We presented the tracing of a subtle near-miss event because of the presence of a random outlier in the contours of a lung tumor, very far from the actual gross tumor volume. The treatment plan was performed with an automated treatment engine using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique. Despite the implementation and adoption of systematic procedures of quality assurance in our clinical routine, the error crossed the barriers of peer review and was identified subsequently only in the step of pretreatment dosimetric verification. The error was corrected, and the patient was replanned before treatment initiation. In this case study, we showed that the random creation of false-positive target outliers may have a detrimental impact on patient dose when automated planning is performed. This risk is not negligible, and all strategies for improving the robustness of target segmentation should be pursued.

靶体积随机离群引起的肺癌放射治疗中的未遂事件。
准确的肿瘤和危险器官轮廓是放射治疗的关键步骤。轮廓程序,无论是手动的还是自动的,都容易出错,并且在很大程度上存在观察者之间和观察者内部的可变性。放射肿瘤学家和/或医学物理学家在制定治疗计划之前,必须对每位患者的所有轮廓进行独立审查,这是一个耗时、费力且仍然不是没有错误的过程。我们提出了一个微妙的未遂事件的追踪,由于在肺肿瘤的轮廓中存在一个随机的离群值,离实际的总肿瘤体积很远。使用VMAT技术的自动处理引擎执行治疗计划。尽管在我们的临床常规中实施和采用了系统的质量保证程序,但错误跨越了同行评审的障碍,随后仅在治疗前剂量学验证的步骤中被识别出来。错误得到了纠正,并且在开始治疗之前对患者进行了重新计划。在本案例研究中,我们表明,当进行自动化计划时,随机产生的假阳性目标异常值可能会对患者剂量产生有害影响。这种风险是不可忽视的,所有提高目标分割鲁棒性的策略都应该追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信