Savino Cilla, Carmela Romano, Gabriella Macchia, Donato Pezzulla, Marica Ferro, Pietro Viola, Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Alessio G Morganti, Francesco Deodato
{"title":"Near-miss Event in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Because of a Random Outlier of Target Volume.","authors":"Savino Cilla, Carmela Romano, Gabriella Macchia, Donato Pezzulla, Marica Ferro, Pietro Viola, Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Alessio G Morganti, Francesco Deodato","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate tumor and organ-at-risk contouring is a critical step in radiation therapy. Contouring procedures, both manual and automated, are prone to errors and to a large degree of interobserver and intraobserver variability. Radiation oncologists and/or medical physicists have to perform independent reviews of all contours for each patient before using them for treatment planning, which is a time-consuming, labor-intensive, and still not error-free process. We presented the tracing of a subtle near-miss event because of the presence of a random outlier in the contours of a lung tumor, very far from the actual gross tumor volume. The treatment plan was performed with an automated treatment engine using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique. Despite the implementation and adoption of systematic procedures of quality assurance in our clinical routine, the error crossed the barriers of peer review and was identified subsequently only in the step of pretreatment dosimetric verification. The error was corrected, and the patient was replanned before treatment initiation. In this case study, we showed that the random creation of false-positive target outliers may have a detrimental impact on patient dose when automated planning is performed. This risk is not negligible, and all strategies for improving the robustness of target segmentation should be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate tumor and organ-at-risk contouring is a critical step in radiation therapy. Contouring procedures, both manual and automated, are prone to errors and to a large degree of interobserver and intraobserver variability. Radiation oncologists and/or medical physicists have to perform independent reviews of all contours for each patient before using them for treatment planning, which is a time-consuming, labor-intensive, and still not error-free process. We presented the tracing of a subtle near-miss event because of the presence of a random outlier in the contours of a lung tumor, very far from the actual gross tumor volume. The treatment plan was performed with an automated treatment engine using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique. Despite the implementation and adoption of systematic procedures of quality assurance in our clinical routine, the error crossed the barriers of peer review and was identified subsequently only in the step of pretreatment dosimetric verification. The error was corrected, and the patient was replanned before treatment initiation. In this case study, we showed that the random creation of false-positive target outliers may have a detrimental impact on patient dose when automated planning is performed. This risk is not negligible, and all strategies for improving the robustness of target segmentation should be pursued.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.