Correlates of polypharmacy and prescription changes in internal medicine: a prospective five-year study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Carmine Frenna, Alice Silvia Brera, Antonio Di Sabatino, Catherine Klersy, Gino Roberto Corazza
{"title":"Correlates of polypharmacy and prescription changes in internal medicine: a prospective five-year study.","authors":"Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Carmine Frenna, Alice Silvia Brera, Antonio Di Sabatino, Catherine Klersy, Gino Roberto Corazza","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding polypharmacy in the internal medicine setting remain limited. We aimed to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy, examine its associations with clinical and socioeconomic factors, and evaluate its impact on mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was part of the San MAtteo Complexity (SMAC) study (2017-2025), conducted in an internal medicine service of an academic medical center. Patients were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. Polypharmacy prevalence was assessed at admission and discharge. Sociodemographic data, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Edmonton Frail Scale, comorbidity, multimorbidity, Short Blessed Test, and Barthel Index were collected. Associations with polypharmacy were analyzed using logistic regression, and early and late mortality were tracked using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1419 patients (median age 80 years, IQR 69-86; F:M ratio 1.14:1), polypharmacy was observed in 71.5% at admission and 82.6% at discharge. Patients with polypharmacy were significantly older, frailer, and had lower socioeconomic status. Independent predictors included age ≥65 years (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.60-10.69), CIRS >3 (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.98-3.58), frailty (OR 3.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.50), comorbidity (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2.19-30.7), multimorbidity (OR 20.91, 95% CI 5.65-77.44), and cardiovascular disorders (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.33-2.55). In-hospital and 4-month mortality were significantly higher among patients who were deprescribed (i.e., discharged with ≤5 fewer medications). Five-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with polypharmacy (HR 2.83, 95% CI 2.07-3.86; p<0.001), regardless of prescription changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in internal medicine, and both deprescribing and polypharmacy are associated with increased mortality at different timepoints, underscoring the need for targeted medication optimization strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.06.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data regarding polypharmacy in the internal medicine setting remain limited. We aimed to assess the prevalence of polypharmacy, examine its associations with clinical and socioeconomic factors, and evaluate its impact on mortality.

Methods: This was part of the San MAtteo Complexity (SMAC) study (2017-2025), conducted in an internal medicine service of an academic medical center. Patients were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. Polypharmacy prevalence was assessed at admission and discharge. Sociodemographic data, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Edmonton Frail Scale, comorbidity, multimorbidity, Short Blessed Test, and Barthel Index were collected. Associations with polypharmacy were analyzed using logistic regression, and early and late mortality were tracked using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Among 1419 patients (median age 80 years, IQR 69-86; F:M ratio 1.14:1), polypharmacy was observed in 71.5% at admission and 82.6% at discharge. Patients with polypharmacy were significantly older, frailer, and had lower socioeconomic status. Independent predictors included age ≥65 years (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.60-10.69), CIRS >3 (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.98-3.58), frailty (OR 3.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.50), comorbidity (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2.19-30.7), multimorbidity (OR 20.91, 95% CI 5.65-77.44), and cardiovascular disorders (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.33-2.55). In-hospital and 4-month mortality were significantly higher among patients who were deprescribed (i.e., discharged with ≤5 fewer medications). Five-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with polypharmacy (HR 2.83, 95% CI 2.07-3.86; p<0.001), regardless of prescription changes.

Conclusions: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in internal medicine, and both deprescribing and polypharmacy are associated with increased mortality at different timepoints, underscoring the need for targeted medication optimization strategies.

综合用药与内科处方变化的相关性:一项为期五年的前瞻性研究。
背景:关于内科综合用药的数据仍然有限。我们的目的是评估多种用药的流行程度,检查其与临床和社会经济因素的关系,并评估其对死亡率的影响。方法:这是圣马泰奥复杂性(SMAC)研究(2017-2025)的一部分,在一家学术医疗中心的内科服务中进行。患者连续前瞻性入组。在入院和出院时评估多种药物的患病率。收集社会人口学资料、累积疾病评定量表(CIRS)、埃德蒙顿虚弱量表、合并症、多病、Short Blessed Test和Barthel指数。使用逻辑回归分析与多种药物的关联,并使用Kaplan-Meier分析跟踪早期和晚期死亡率。结果:1419例患者(中位年龄80岁,IQR 69-86;F:M比值为1.14:1),入院时多药率为71.5%,出院时为82.6%。服用多种药物的患者明显年龄较大,身体虚弱,社会经济地位较低。独立预测因素包括年龄≥65岁(OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.60-10.69)、CIRS bb0.3 (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.98-3.58)、虚弱(OR 3.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.50)、合并症(OR 8.2, 95% CI 2.19-30.7)、多病(OR 20.91, 95% CI 5.65-77.44)和心血管疾病(OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.33-2.55)。未开处方(即出院时用药少于5种)的患者住院和4个月死亡率明显较高。多药组患者的5年死亡率显著高于多药组(HR 2.83, 95% CI 2.07-3.86;结论:多种用药在内科非常普遍,不同时间点的减处方和多种用药均与死亡率增加相关,强调有针对性的药物优化策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信