Clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis in persons experiencing homelessness.

IF 5.5 1区 医学
Torrance Teng, Kyle Crooker, Tess Hickey, Max HoddWells, Ashwini Sarathy, Sean Muniz, Jennifer Lor, Amy Chang, Bradley J Tompkins, Aaron O'Brien, Elly Riser, Devika Singh, Jean Dejace, Andrew J Hale
{"title":"Clinical features and outcomes of infective endocarditis in persons experiencing homelessness.","authors":"Torrance Teng, Kyle Crooker, Tess Hickey, Max HoddWells, Ashwini Sarathy, Sean Muniz, Jennifer Lor, Amy Chang, Bradley J Tompkins, Aaron O'Brien, Elly Riser, Devika Singh, Jean Dejace, Andrew J Hale","doi":"10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and current treatment guidelines recommend a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. However, individuals experiencing homelessness face greater barriers to standard IE care. The aim of this study was to compare IE characteristics and outcomes in an unhoused population versus a housed population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study encompassing 2010-2020 was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE who did or did not experience homelessness at the time of their infection. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of microbiologic failure and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 378 included patients with IE, 30 (7.9%) experienced homelessness and 348 (92.1%) did not. The unhoused cohort was more likely to have right-sided IE involving the tricuspid valve (50.0% vs 21.6%, P = 0.006) and for the causative organism to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [9 (30.0%) vs 43 (12.4%), P = 0.039]. Mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates were not significantly different between groups at any time point measured. For secondary outcomes, differences in microbiologic failure [5 (16.7%) vs 36 (10.3%), P = 0.543] and treatment failure [9 (30.0%) vs 105 (30.2%), P = 1.000] were also not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should elucidate factors that entail increased risk of poor outcomes in this important underserved population and how to best mitigate them.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":"14 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01318-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and current treatment guidelines recommend a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. However, individuals experiencing homelessness face greater barriers to standard IE care. The aim of this study was to compare IE characteristics and outcomes in an unhoused population versus a housed population.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing 2010-2020 was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE who did or did not experience homelessness at the time of their infection. Primary outcomes included 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of microbiologic failure and treatment failure.

Results: Of 378 included patients with IE, 30 (7.9%) experienced homelessness and 348 (92.1%) did not. The unhoused cohort was more likely to have right-sided IE involving the tricuspid valve (50.0% vs 21.6%, P = 0.006) and for the causative organism to be methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [9 (30.0%) vs 43 (12.4%), P = 0.039]. Mortality, IE-related mortality, and IE-related readmission rates were not significantly different between groups at any time point measured. For secondary outcomes, differences in microbiologic failure [5 (16.7%) vs 36 (10.3%), P = 0.543] and treatment failure [9 (30.0%) vs 105 (30.2%), P = 1.000] were also not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Future research should elucidate factors that entail increased risk of poor outcomes in this important underserved population and how to best mitigate them.

无家可归者感染性心内膜炎的临床特征和结局。
背景:感染性心内膜炎(IE)与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,目前的治疗指南推荐延长静脉注射抗生素疗程。然而,无家可归的人在标准的IE护理方面面临更大的障碍。本研究的目的是比较无住房人群和有住房人群的IE特征和结果。方法:在佛蒙特州伯灵顿进行了一项2010-2020年的回顾性队列研究,比较了在感染时经历过或没有经历过无家可归的IE患者的特征和结果。主要结局包括30天、90天和365天死亡率、ie相关死亡率和ie相关再入院率。次要结局包括微生物学失败率和治疗失败率。结果:在378例IE患者中,30例(7.9%)经历过无家可归,348例(92.1%)没有。未被收容的队列更容易发生包括三尖瓣的右侧IE(50.0%比21.6%,P = 0.006),致病菌为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)[9(30.0%)比43 (12.4%),P = 0.039]。在测量的任何时间点上,两组之间的死亡率、ie相关死亡率和ie相关再入院率无显著差异。次要结局方面,微生物学失败[5例(16.7%)vs 36例(10.3%),P = 0.543]和治疗失败[9例(30.0%)vs 105例(30.2%),P = 1.000]的差异也无统计学意义。结论:未来的研究应阐明在这一重要的服务不足人群中导致不良结果风险增加的因素,以及如何最好地减轻这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信