Cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning among people aged 50 years and older: evidence from two longitudinal cohort studies.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bin Han, Ziqian Zeng, Ying Wen, Chu Chen, Daomei Cheng, Yachao Li, Ning Huang, Jia Ruan, Dan Zhao, Qingping Xue
{"title":"Cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning among people aged 50 years and older: evidence from two longitudinal cohort studies.","authors":"Bin Han, Ziqian Zeng, Ying Wen, Chu Chen, Daomei Cheng, Yachao Li, Ning Huang, Jia Ruan, Dan Zhao, Qingping Xue","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01624-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Our study assesses the association between cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two comparative cohort studies were used, including the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Cumulative handgrip strength was calculated using three repeated measurements of handgrip strength. Linear mixed regression models evaluated the association between cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning. Cox regression models were performed to determine the association between cumulative handgrip strength and the risk of cognitive and functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength had lower global cognition (β: -0.244; 95% CI: -0.317, -0.170 for ELSA and -0.359; -0.406, -0.311 for SHARE) and experienced a faster decline in cognitive function over time (-0.025; -0.037, -0.013 for ELSA, and -0.019; -0.026, -0.013 in SHARE). We found lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength were associated with lower daily functioning (β: 0.267; 95% CI: 0.161, 0.374 for ELSA and 0.153; 0.079, 0.227 for SHARE), and a faster decline in daily functioning over time (0.105; 0.081, 0.129 for ELSA and 0.217; 0.195, 0.238 for SHARE). Furthermore, lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength were related to a higher risk of cognitive and functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggested that lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength was related to an accelerated decline in cognitive function and daily functioning. Persistently strengthening muscle strength should be emphasized in preventing neurodegenerative disorders and disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01624-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Our study assesses the association between cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning.

Methods: Two comparative cohort studies were used, including the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Cumulative handgrip strength was calculated using three repeated measurements of handgrip strength. Linear mixed regression models evaluated the association between cumulative handgrip strength and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and daily functioning. Cox regression models were performed to determine the association between cumulative handgrip strength and the risk of cognitive and functional impairment.

Results: Individuals with lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength had lower global cognition (β: -0.244; 95% CI: -0.317, -0.170 for ELSA and -0.359; -0.406, -0.311 for SHARE) and experienced a faster decline in cognitive function over time (-0.025; -0.037, -0.013 for ELSA, and -0.019; -0.026, -0.013 in SHARE). We found lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength were associated with lower daily functioning (β: 0.267; 95% CI: 0.161, 0.374 for ELSA and 0.153; 0.079, 0.227 for SHARE), and a faster decline in daily functioning over time (0.105; 0.081, 0.129 for ELSA and 0.217; 0.195, 0.238 for SHARE). Furthermore, lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength were related to a higher risk of cognitive and functional impairment.

Conclusions: Our study suggested that lower levels of cumulative handgrip strength was related to an accelerated decline in cognitive function and daily functioning. Persistently strengthening muscle strength should be emphasized in preventing neurodegenerative disorders and disabilities.

Abstract Image

50岁及以上人群的累积握力与认知功能和日常功能的纵向变化:来自两项纵向队列研究的证据
背景和目的:我们的研究评估了累积握力与认知功能和日常功能的纵向变化之间的关系。方法:采用两项比较队列研究,包括英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)和欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)。累积握力通过三次重复的握力测量来计算。线性混合回归模型评估了累积握力与认知功能和日常功能的纵向变化之间的关系。采用Cox回归模型来确定累积握力与认知和功能障碍风险之间的关系。结果:累积握力水平越低的个体整体认知水平越低(β: -0.244;95% CI: -0.317, -0.170 ELSA和-0.359;-0.406, -0.311),随着时间的推移认知功能下降更快(-0.025;ELSA为-0.037,-0.013,-0.019;-0.026, SHARE为-0.013)。我们发现较低水平的累积握力与较低的日常功能相关(β: 0.267;95% CI: 0.161, ELSA为0.374,0.153;0.079, SHARE为0.227),随着时间的推移,日常功能下降更快(0.105;ELSA为0.081,0.129,0.217;0.195, SHARE为0.238)。此外,较低的累积握力水平与较高的认知和功能障碍风险相关。结论:我们的研究表明,较低水平的累积握力与认知功能和日常功能的加速下降有关。在预防神经退行性疾病和残疾方面,应强调持续增强肌肉力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信