The Role of Foxes in Transmitting Zoonotic Bacteria to Humans: A Scoping Review

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Emma C. Hobbs, Bridgette McNamara, Sarah Hayman, Kim Blasdell, Eugene Athan, Daniel P. O'Brien, Michael Muleme
{"title":"The Role of Foxes in Transmitting Zoonotic Bacteria to Humans: A Scoping Review","authors":"Emma C. Hobbs,&nbsp;Bridgette McNamara,&nbsp;Sarah Hayman,&nbsp;Kim Blasdell,&nbsp;Eugene Athan,&nbsp;Daniel P. O'Brien,&nbsp;Michael Muleme","doi":"10.1111/zph.13230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zoonotic diseases inflict substantial burdens on human and animal populations worldwide, and many of these infections are bacterial. An Australian study investigating environmental risk factors for Buruli ulcer in humans detected the causative agent, \n <i>Mycobacterium ulcerans</i>\n , in the faeces of wild foxes, a novel finding that suggests foxes may be implicated in the transmission of this zoonotic bacterium. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically search and examine the global data for reports implicating foxes in the transmission of zoonotic bacteria to humans. A pre-tested search strategy was implemented in five bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane Trials, Google Scholar). Eligible studies presented primary research data about zoonotic bacterial diseases that were confirmed or presumed to have been transmitted via foxes (excluding exclusively blood- or vector-borne bacteria), with no restrictions on geographical setting or publication year. The final dataset included ten primary research articles, with varying study designs, settings, populations and testing methods. The described bacterial zoonoses were anthrax, cutaneous diphtheria, leptospirosis, faecal coliforms including \n <i>E. coli</i>\n , tularaemia, yersiniosis, and Buruli ulcer (the study that was the impetus for this scoping review). Fox-human bacterial transmission was confirmed in one human case and considered likely to have occurred in certain high-risk groups in another. The likelihood of fox-human transmission having occurred in the remaining studies was possible (<i>n</i> = 5) or unlikely (<i>n</i> = 3). Identified and hypothesised drivers of fox-human transmission included accidental and occupational factors. Published reports of fox-human transmission of zoonotic bacteria are few, and generally indicative of relatively low risk. However, foxes can transmit zoonotic pathogens including bacteria to humans in a variety of settings, and human-fox encounters are likely to increase with ongoing anthropogenic activities. Further research and public education campaigns would help increase knowledge and awareness of fox-associated zoonoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":24025,"journal":{"name":"Zoonoses and Public Health","volume":"72 6","pages":"485-500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/zph.13230","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoonoses and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zoonotic diseases inflict substantial burdens on human and animal populations worldwide, and many of these infections are bacterial. An Australian study investigating environmental risk factors for Buruli ulcer in humans detected the causative agent, Mycobacterium ulcerans , in the faeces of wild foxes, a novel finding that suggests foxes may be implicated in the transmission of this zoonotic bacterium. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically search and examine the global data for reports implicating foxes in the transmission of zoonotic bacteria to humans. A pre-tested search strategy was implemented in five bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane Trials, Google Scholar). Eligible studies presented primary research data about zoonotic bacterial diseases that were confirmed or presumed to have been transmitted via foxes (excluding exclusively blood- or vector-borne bacteria), with no restrictions on geographical setting or publication year. The final dataset included ten primary research articles, with varying study designs, settings, populations and testing methods. The described bacterial zoonoses were anthrax, cutaneous diphtheria, leptospirosis, faecal coliforms including E. coli , tularaemia, yersiniosis, and Buruli ulcer (the study that was the impetus for this scoping review). Fox-human bacterial transmission was confirmed in one human case and considered likely to have occurred in certain high-risk groups in another. The likelihood of fox-human transmission having occurred in the remaining studies was possible (n = 5) or unlikely (n = 3). Identified and hypothesised drivers of fox-human transmission included accidental and occupational factors. Published reports of fox-human transmission of zoonotic bacteria are few, and generally indicative of relatively low risk. However, foxes can transmit zoonotic pathogens including bacteria to humans in a variety of settings, and human-fox encounters are likely to increase with ongoing anthropogenic activities. Further research and public education campaigns would help increase knowledge and awareness of fox-associated zoonoses.

Abstract Image

狐狸在将人畜共患病细菌传播给人类中的作用:范围综述。
人畜共患疾病给全世界的人类和动物种群造成了巨大的负担,其中许多感染是细菌感染。澳大利亚的一项研究调查了人类布鲁里溃疡的环境风险因素,在野生狐狸的粪便中发现了病原体溃疡分枝杆菌,这一新发现表明狐狸可能与这种人畜共患细菌的传播有关。这项范围审查的目的是系统地搜索和检查涉及狐狸向人类传播人畜共患病细菌的报告的全球数据。在五个书目数据库(PubMed, Embase, CAB Abstracts, Cochrane Trials,谷歌Scholar)中实施了预先测试的搜索策略。符合条件的研究提供了确认或推定通过狐狸传播的人畜共患细菌性疾病(完全不包括血液或媒介传播的细菌)的初步研究数据,不受地理环境或出版年份的限制。最终的数据集包括10篇主要研究文章,研究设计、设置、人群和测试方法各不相同。所描述的细菌性人畜共患病有炭疽、皮肤白喉、钩端螺旋体病、粪便大肠菌群(包括大肠杆菌)、土拉菌病、耶尔森菌病和布鲁里溃疡(该研究是本综述的推动力)。在一例人类病例中确认了狐-人细菌传播,在另一例病例中被认为可能发生在某些高危人群中。在其余研究中,有可能(n = 5)或不太可能(n = 3)发生狐-人传播的可能性。确定和假设的狐-人传播驱动因素包括意外和职业因素。已发表的关于人畜共患细菌在狐-人之间传播的报告很少,通常表明风险相对较低。然而,狐狸可以在各种环境中向人类传播包括细菌在内的人畜共患病病原体,并且随着人类活动的进行,人类与狐狸的接触可能会增加。进一步的研究和公众教育活动将有助于提高对与狐狸有关的人畜共患病的认识和认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoonoses and Public Health
Zoonoses and Public Health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoonoses and Public Health brings together veterinary and human health researchers and policy-makers by providing a venue for publishing integrated and global approaches to zoonoses and public health. The Editors will consider papers that focus on timely collaborative and multi-disciplinary research in zoonoses and public health. This journal provides rapid publication of original papers, reviews, and potential discussion papers embracing this collaborative spirit. Papers should advance the scientific knowledge of the sources, transmission, prevention and control of zoonoses and be authored by scientists with expertise in areas such as microbiology, virology, parasitology and epidemiology. Articles that incorporate recent data into new methods, applications, or approaches (e.g. statistical modeling) which enhance public health are strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信