Xue Li , Kexin Jing , Liqun He , Ping Song , Jing Yu
{"title":"Impact of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances structure on oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disruption in HepG2 cells","authors":"Xue Li , Kexin Jing , Liqun He , Ping Song , Jing Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.tox.2025.154218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are bioaccumulative pollutants that pose risks to ecosystems and human health, with oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disorder playing key roles in their hepatotoxicity. However, the toxicological differences between PFASs with varying chain lengths and functional groups remain unclear. This study exposed HepG2 cells to different concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 400 μM) of PFOA, PFOS, PFBA, and PFBS for 24 h to investigate their cytotoxicity and underlying mechanisms. Results indicated that all four PFASs reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. Long-chain PFASs in particular, induced oxidative stress, as evidenced by elevated ROS and MDA levels. Metabolomics revealed significant alterations in lipid and amino acid metabolisms, with lipid metabolism being the most disrupted. Further analysis showed up-regulation of lipid metabolism-related genes and increased TG content, confirming these findings. Correlation analysis revealed that PFASs exacerbate oxidative stress and lipid accumulation through lipid metabolism disorders, resulting in reduced cell viability. Notably, long-chain PFASs (PFOA and PFOS) were more toxic than short-chain PFASs (PFBA and PFBS), and sulfonate-based PFASs (PFOS, PFBS) were more toxic than carboxylate-based ones (PFOA, PFBA) of similar chain length. This study provides insights into the differential toxicity of PFASs, offering a theoretical foundation for improved risk assessment and management of these compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23159,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology","volume":"517 ","pages":"Article 154218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300483X25001775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are bioaccumulative pollutants that pose risks to ecosystems and human health, with oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disorder playing key roles in their hepatotoxicity. However, the toxicological differences between PFASs with varying chain lengths and functional groups remain unclear. This study exposed HepG2 cells to different concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 400 μM) of PFOA, PFOS, PFBA, and PFBS for 24 h to investigate their cytotoxicity and underlying mechanisms. Results indicated that all four PFASs reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. Long-chain PFASs in particular, induced oxidative stress, as evidenced by elevated ROS and MDA levels. Metabolomics revealed significant alterations in lipid and amino acid metabolisms, with lipid metabolism being the most disrupted. Further analysis showed up-regulation of lipid metabolism-related genes and increased TG content, confirming these findings. Correlation analysis revealed that PFASs exacerbate oxidative stress and lipid accumulation through lipid metabolism disorders, resulting in reduced cell viability. Notably, long-chain PFASs (PFOA and PFOS) were more toxic than short-chain PFASs (PFBA and PFBS), and sulfonate-based PFASs (PFOS, PFBS) were more toxic than carboxylate-based ones (PFOA, PFBA) of similar chain length. This study provides insights into the differential toxicity of PFASs, offering a theoretical foundation for improved risk assessment and management of these compounds.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes only the highest quality original scientific research and critical reviews describing hypothesis-based investigations into mechanisms of toxicity associated with exposures to xenobiotic chemicals, particularly as it relates to human health. In this respect "mechanisms" is defined on both the macro (e.g. physiological, biological, kinetic, species, sex, etc.) and molecular (genomic, transcriptomic, metabolic, etc.) scale. Emphasis is placed on findings that identify novel hazards and that can be extrapolated to exposures and mechanisms that are relevant to estimating human risk. Toxicology also publishes brief communications, personal commentaries and opinion articles, as well as concise expert reviews on contemporary topics. All research and review articles published in Toxicology are subject to rigorous peer review. Authors are asked to contact the Editor-in-Chief prior to submitting review articles or commentaries for consideration for publication in Toxicology.